Republicans Banned From Running For Re-Election

Photo by Elliott Stallion on Unsplash

( – On Thursday, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled against 10 Republican state senators who had engaged in a prolonged boycott last summer, aiming to halt legislation concerning abortion access for minors and transgender individuals, as well as regulations on untraceable firearms, also known as “ghost guns.” This decision means these senators are ineligible for re-election this year.

The Republican caucus criticized the decision, asserting that the court, perceived as leaning towards Democratic preferences, ruled against them despite what they argue is the clear wording of the state Constitution. This ruling was in line with a declaration by the Democratic Secretary of State, LaVonne Griffin-Valade, disqualifying these lawmakers based on Measure 113. This measure, endorsed by Oregon voters in 2022, was designed to prevent such boycotts by disqualifying legislators from re-election if they accumulated more than 10 unexcused absences.

The boycott in question, which lasted six weeks and was the longest in the state’s history, resulted in a significant delay in legislative proceedings, affecting hundreds of bills. The controversy led five of the affected senators to challenge the Secretary of State’s decision, arguing for their right to re-election despite their absences.

The senators, along with their supporters, have voiced their concerns over the ruling’s potential to suppress dissent and criticized the judiciary’s alignment with political rather than legal principles. They argue that the Supreme Court’s interpretation contradicts the straightforward language of the law and undermines the intention of the voters.

The debate also delved into the nuances of the constitutional amendment brought about by Measure 113, particularly its wording, which became a focal point during the court’s deliberation. The crux of the argument revolved around whether the penalty for excessive absences should apply immediately or only after an additional term.

This ruling comes in the wake of several Republican-led walkouts in recent years, which have sparked debates over legislative processes and the balance of power in Oregon. The 2023 walkout, in particular, drew attention due to its impact on significant legislation, leading to a negotiated compromise that adjusted some of the more contentious aspects of the proposed laws.

The outcome of this legal battle underscores the ongoing tensions within Oregon’s political landscape, highlighting the complexities of governance and the delicate balance between legislative tactics and democratic principles.

Copyright 2024,