Small Metal Cages Found Outside ICE Detention Center

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services document with American flag — Photo: Constantine Pankin / Shutterstock

The federal watchdog says 79 people were put into phone-booth-sized metal enclosures and called it “calming.”

Story Snapshot

Inspectors said 79 detainees were confined in small metal enclosures, some for nearly two hours.
The enclosures measured about 18 square feet and sat in outdoor recreation yards.
Staff labeled them “calming areas,” while the watchdog called the practice unprecedented.
Earlier human-rights reporting had flagged cage-like spaces at the same site.

Watchdog details outdoor metal enclosures and how they were used

The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General reported that 79 detainees at the Everglades Detention Facility, known as “Alligator Alcatraz,” were held in small metal enclosures between minutes and nearly two hours. The report described two outdoor units about four feet three inches by four feet three inches and almost eight feet tall. The watchdog called the use “unprecedented” across detention sites it has inspected and warned of health and safety risks tied to heat, exposure, and stress.

Facility staff told inspectors the pens were “calming areas” meant for de-escalation. The label did not change the core facts the watchdog documented: narrow metal spaces, outdoors, with people held inside for defined periods. The New York Times said the report flagged the practice as highly unconventional and not aligned with humane treatment standards. The watchdog’s language was plain and direct, not hedged or theoretical. This is why the description stuck in public debate.

Numbers, standards, and what “unprecedented” really signals

Seventy-nine placements is not a rounding error. It points to a repeat practice over time, not a one-off improvisation. The inspector general’s office has inspected many immigration facilities over years. When that office uses the word “unprecedented,” it means it has not seen anything like it in prior site visits. That claim carries weight because it reflects a comparative record, not an advocacy frame. The term also sets a benchmark for future audits and enforcement conversations.

The report also flagged broader shortfalls at the site, including environmental health and safety, medical care, food service, hygiene, and recreation. Those findings match a pattern seen in fast-built “soft-sided” detention centers. These places start as temporary answers to crowding, then drift away from ordinary norms. Earlier human-rights work on Alligator Alcatraz had already described cage-like confinement, which gives this report added context, even if the watchdog stands on its own record.

The counter from officials and how it measures up

Department of Homeland Security officials pushed back on broad claims about inhumane conditions and said the facility met federal standards. A public defense in 2025 called some allegations hoaxes and denied solitary confinement at the site. A state spokesperson also dismissed “the box” as punishment, calling reporting politically driven. These statements offer a straight denial and a justification for the enclosures as de-escalation tools, but they do not erase the inspector general’s measurements, counts, and photos.

NEWS: A new DHS inspector general report says immigrants held at Florida’s now-closed “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center were sometimes placed in outdoor metal cages measuring about 4-by-4 feet — smaller than a phone booth — for up to roughly two hours.

Facility staff called…

— MDBayNews (@MDBayNews) September 14, 2026

Common-sense values say government should keep order without degrading people. Conservatives expect rules, personal responsibility, and limits on state power. Locking a person in a four-by-four metal pen outdoors, even for short stints, tests those limits. If an operator claims a “calming area,” it should meet basic safety: shade, water, seated space, time limits, logs, and medical checks. The watchdog’s account suggests those guardrails were thin or missing, which is why the practice drew the “unprecedented” label.

What accountability looks like after the spotlight moves

The site has closed, which often buries evidence and dulls focus. Accountability now hinges on records and standards. Three steps would cut through the noise: release the full inspector general report with appendices; produce the facility’s placement logs showing who ordered each confinement and why; and publish design and procurement records for the metal enclosures. These documents would confirm whether this was a designed feature, an ad hoc fix, or a misused security device.

Policy fixes are not complicated. Ban outdoor metal enclosures for people in custody. Require climate-safe rooms for any de-escalation, with time caps and real monitoring. Tie contractor pay to verified compliance with health, safety, and recreation rules. Sunlight and simple guardrails protect both staff and detainees. If another surge forces quick builds, these rules should travel with the tents. The inspector general has drawn the map; leaders need to walk it before the next crisis arrives.