Trump’s Defamation Settlement Leads to Possibility of More Legal Action

Donald Trump secures $15 million settlement from ABC News in defamation lawsuit, setting precedent for future legal action against media and influencers.

At a Glance

ABC News agrees to pay $15 million to settle Trump’s defamation lawsuit.
Lawsuit stems from false statements about Trump.
Settlement includes editor’s note and $1 million for legal fees.
Case raises questions about media responsibility and public figure defamation.

Trump’s Legal Victory Against ABC News

In a significant development, ABC News has agreed to pay Donald Trump $15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. The legal action, initiated by the former president, targeted both the news network and anchor George Stephanopoulos over statements made during a broadcast. Trump accused Stephanopoulos of falsely claiming he had been “found liable for rape,” a statement that formed the crux of the lawsuit.

The settlement, signed by both Trump and Stephanopoulos, includes several key provisions. ABC News must publish an editor’s note expressing regret for the statements made during the interview. Additionally, the network will cover $1 million of Trump’s legal fees. This resolution comes after a judge had initially ordered depositions for both parties involved.

ABC News has agreed to pay $15 million toward Donald Trump's presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuithttps://t.co/SzkgfdnWqW

— TIME (@TIME) December 15, 2024

Context of the Defamation Claim

The lawsuit’s origins can be traced back to a May 2023 case where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Crucially, the jury did not find Trump liable for rape. This distinction became the focal point of Trump’s defamation claim against ABC News when Stephanopoulos allegedly mischaracterized the verdict.

The settlement agreement includes a notable provision for a charitable contribution to a Presidential foundation and museum to be established by Trump. This aspect of the settlement underscores the broader implications of the case beyond mere financial compensation.

Implications for Media Responsibility

This settlement raises important questions about media responsibility and the boundaries of reporting on public figures. Trump’s successful lawsuit against a major news network may set a precedent for how media outlets approach reporting on controversial topics and public figures. It highlights the need for precision in language, especially when discussing legal matters.

The case also brings attention to the legal definition of terms under specific state laws. Judge Lewis Kaplan noted the narrow legal definition under New York law, which played a crucial role in distinguishing between the jury’s findings and Stephanopoulos’s on-air statements.

Broader Legal Strategy

This settlement is part of a broader legal strategy employed by Trump. He has filed similar lawsuits against other major media outlets, including CBS, CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, with varying outcomes. These legal actions demonstrate Trump’s aggressive approach to managing his public image and challenging media narratives he perceives as unfair or inaccurate.

As the media landscape continues to evolve, particularly with the rise of social media and online influencers, this case may serve as a benchmark for future defamation claims. It underscores the potential legal risks faced by not just traditional media outlets but also individual commentators and online personalities when discussing public figures.