Trump Puts Birther Issue to Bed With One Last Shot

If Donald Trump can lead the country the way he has masterfully led the mainstream media, we are looking at a hell of a ride with him in the White House. Forget about making American great “again”; with Trump in charge, we’ll make this country better than it’s ever been before.

Just look at the way he played those fools this week. They spent the last half of the week covering a non-story…just because Trump wanted them to. For no reason whatsoever, the “birther” controversy was back in the headlines this week. Well, not for no reason – for the simply reason that Trump decided that would be a good thing to talk about. So after 24 hours of hype, he delivered a press conference on Friday and told the world what his campaign had already said the night before. And every news network was hanging on every word.

“Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy. I finished it,” Trump said. “President Barack Obama was born in the United States, period. Now we all want to get back to making America strong and great again.”

And just like that, it’s settled.

Now, is this really what Trump believes? Is it the truth? Was Obama indeed born in Hawaii? Was he a legitimate president all along?

Those questions were not answered, and indeed they cannot be answered by any one man. The evidence of Obama’s curious citizenship circumstances is murky, which says a lot all by itself. But whether he ever was a natural born citizen or not, the fact remains that his tenure in office is coming to an end. It’s time to move on, and Trump is doing so with a flourish.

Best of all, of course, is how he is throwing this back on Hillary Clinton. The evidence for her being the original birther is ample. Her campaign never took full advantage of the controversy, but her staff unquestionably brought the questions up while looking for a way to beat Obama in 2008.

“Trump doubled down on lie-filled statement from his campaign last night & took no responsibility for his bigoted attacks on our President,” said Clinton’s campaign manager.

There’s no responsibility to take. No bigotry. No lies.

Actually, scratch that last part. There have been plenty of lies. They’ve come from Clinton and they’ve come from Obama. And they’ve come from the mainstream media that is so dedicated to bringing Trump down that they don’t realize that he’s been playing them all along.

About Admin

219 comments

  1. MolokaiAdvertiserNews

    Tell Trump: No Obama BC in HDOH Records per gov. Abercrombie

    Someone please inform Donald Trump that his advisors have failed to inform him that even Hawaii governor Neil Abercrombie, who loves Obama and promised to search the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Health Records to find Obama’s original birth certificate to end the controversy and prove Obama was born in Hawaii, could not find any Obama birth certificate, REPEAT: gov. Abercrombie admitted publicly that there is no Barack Obama birth certificate on file in the official records of the Hawaii Department of Health.

    Please tell Donald Trump to review that information from gov. Abercrombie, and also point out that in 2008, the Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz refused to allow Obama on the Hawaii ballot because he knew Obama had no proof he was born in USA, not even in Hawaii. Nancy Pelosi filed fraudulent DNC papers to get Obama on the Hawaii ballot……..ETC. And the long form released by Obama is definitely a PhotoShopped criminal I.D. Fraudulent document. AND, there is a real birth certificate for Barack H. Obama from the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya where he was born. Everyone in Kenya knows Obama was born in Kenya.

    Donald Trump, do not back down, bend over for Obama the fraud I.D. Usurper Illegal Alien MuslimMigration Jihadist Infiltrator Enemy Combatant Enemy number One of USA. Obama has failed to show any proof that he is or ever was eligible for POTUS. Charge him with TREASON and many other high crimes, and arrest Obama and Hillary et al to NDAA Prison for life.

    Please reply, asap.

    George Peabody

    10254 Kamehameha V Hwy

    Kaunakakai, HI 96748

    ph. 1-808-558-8253 email: MolokaiMAN@basicisp.net

    • GREAT POST, SIR. You are, of course, a teller of truth here. Thanks.

    • Molikai,
      I don’t think he was born in Kenya. I have not seen any information on that idea from the liberal press. But it is too late to change anything. However, it is far from too late to make sure a candidate is legally eligible for the office before entering the election process.

      • Of course you haven’t seen any information in the liberal press that points to the fact that Obama was born in Kenya. That would go against their whole commitment to be on the side of Democratic liars in all circumstances and to always attack those who point out their lies. The press is as full of liars as the Democratic party, with a few exception for the rare honest reporter.

        • rocky63,
          Here is what the press had to say in 2009.
          The liberal press did portray a very likely story on when and where Obama was born. But it was Vancouver, BC, not Kenya. Stanley’s mother had a sister living in Blaine, Washington at the time. It is likely that the baby was born earlier than than the expected date. There was no hospital in 1961 in Blaine. The nearest US hospital was in Bellingham, Washington, some 30 miles away. But just two miles away in White Rock, BC was a hospital. That did not sit well with Stanley’s mother so she cooked up a “”born at home” story to give to the hospital in Honolulu. The hospital then likely wrote up a birth certificate for that particular hospital, making Obama a US citizen. That story is a matter of fact as reported in the news. Is it true? Consider these facts.
          1. The birth certificate says Obama was born on August 4, 1961.
          2. Stanley Ann attended her first class at the U. of Washington on August 19, 1961. That is a fact. Can anyone buy the fact that she had a baby in Honolulu and 19 days later was attending classes in Seattle? There is no record yet located of her enrolling in UW prior to August 19. When did she have time to fly from Honolulu to Hawaii, enroll and attend class in less than 15 days? Enrollment was not done electronically then as now. Yet records show she was attending class at UW on August 19, 1961.
          Had I known this in 2009 I would have jumped on this issue then. It is now water under the bridge. But it is absolutely relevant to the abuse of the Constitution today. Nothing was done to resolve the fact that Cruz was also born in Canada who had a Cuban father or Rubio, who was born in Florida but has Cuban parents.
          The Constitution specifically says that only a person that is a natural born citizen is qualified to be President. I know from the writings of the Constitutional Convention that the intent was to use rhe European rule of natural both citizens whose parents were also citizens of the country where the elected official is in power.

        • Fanfaron 2011,
          I am aware of the video but he resorted later to the birth certificate as “proof” he was born in Honolulu. I do not wish to raise this issue as it is a lost cause at this late date.

          • People have mentioned obvious errors on his birth certificate… like the hospital on it wasn’t in existence until years later… there were other mistakes on it but I don’t remember them all.

          • Fanfaron2011,
            The real issue with what I have read on the past concerning Stanley Ann’s mother is that she was determined to establish that her grandson was a US citizen. She was also bothered by the fact that her upcoming grandson was going to be black. Apparently that is why the family moved from the US mainland to Hawaii. That state had more mixed race kids than the mainland. She did not seem to be ashamed of the kid being black. She just wanted to raise him in a more mixed racial environment. Honolulu offered that opportunity.

    • Trump had to do what he did, or Hillary would have had him by the short hairs!

      But he did it with a flourish!
      Good thing that he too is an accomplished liar!

      That said, he sometimes does tell the truth on porpuse, unlike Hillary who only does so by accident!
      Go Trump!

    • Don’t you get it? NO BODY GIVES A SHIT ANYMORE.

      Defeating the Cackling Witch is the only thing that matters anymore.

    • https://www.donaldjtrump.com/contact

      You can send an email to him at this link.

  2. All Trump needs to say is, “When Hillary started the “birther” rumor about Obama in 2008, I thought that might be a good thing to investigate, just to find out if it was true.”

    • And, it IS TRUE. His so-called birth certificate is full of things that can’t possibly be true, such as saying he was born in a Hawaiian hospital that didn’t even exist until years after his birth.

      Ironically, that means that when Hillary said he was not born in the US, back in 2008, she (no doubt accidentally) was telling truth. That was a very rare thing for her to do, but, of course, she was willing to even say something that was true to try to get her way into the White House, instead of Obama.

      • Didn’t that hit the nail on the head? HA! Even liars like Pharaoh Barry and Crooked HilLIARy will make a true statement, IF it suits their purpose. That is just like the devil himself, whose abject slaves they are, and may they wake up and turn to the Master Yahushua (Lord Jesus) for salvation, before they end up following the devil into the place that was made for him, Gei-Hinnom, the Lake of Fire (Matthew 25:41). There is no pleasure, says Yahuwah, in the death of the wicked, but that we should all turn from our sins and to the Master to be saved from that end (Ezekiel chapters 18 and 33, for example), in the Name of the Master Yahushua, omein.

        • right you are.

        • She had to tighten up, hold her breath, clench her fists, and take a deep breath. Then she was able to tell the truth once. I’m sure she had a coughing fit right after that, and probably had a seizure.
          It was a traumatic 2 minutes for her.

        • Democraps telling a truth is kind like like a blind squirrel finding an acorn every now and then. Accidents happen, you know.

          • When the scoffers hear the long and loud and ever longer and louder blast of the shofar of our Master Yahushua (Lord Jesus) as He descends with tens of thousands of His saints on His way to His throne in Jerusalem, there is liable to be another accident, this time in their pants, LOL. But those who are longing for His return will be singing and dancing! He will raise His saints from their graves and change those living at the time from mortal to immortal, and we will work with Him to clean up these Dark Ages. He will take the kingdoms of this world and make them the Kingdom of Yahuwah and of His Messiah (Revelation 11:15, and we will finally have peace on earth, omein!

      • After Hillary realized she had told the truth, she had to call George Soros and beg for absolution. “Forgive me father, for I knew not what I was doing.”

        • Well, she had to protect the long-existing flow of large amounts of money into her (and Bill’s) pockets, didn’t she? How else would she continue to buy $12,000 jackets while she condemns the “top 1%” of Americans, which would include the Clintons.

  3. According to the lead article at: http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/who-was-the-first-birther/, the first “birther” was actually Pharaoh Barry himself. Check it out.

      • Thank you. That’s a highly informative video, and one wonders how such a massive fraud was pulled off.
        We nevertheless have the consolation that the most embarrassing possible time is coming up for ALL the frauds and oppressions that have been perpetrated in these Dark Ages. They will be exposed at the White Throne Judgment mentioned in Revelation 20, and just as the Master Yahushua (Lord Jesus) was quoted, per Matthew 10:26, Mark 4:22, Luke 8:17 and 12:2, all the secret things, the backroom deals and whatever, will be exposed. Those who have refused to accept the Master as their Redeemer will see the people IN the Kingdom and themselves cast out, on the way to become ashes, as Malachi 4:1-3 says. Romans 6:23 says the wages of sin is death, not everlasting life in hell-fire, but all have the freedom of choice to choose life in the Master Yahushua, and may we indeed do so, omein.

      • Excelt forgery.
        WHat is the point of playing that chilodish game?

  4. if and I say if he was born in Hawaii why would any man spend millions of dollars to have lawyers to make sure none of his personal records were opened if he doesn’t have something to hide from the public?This was done before he became nominated and is still in place. Who’s money is he spending to make sure nobody sees his records of life?

    • Whose??? LOL That’s not hard to answer. The PMIC is using YOUR tax money and MY tax money, OF COURSE!! ?

      • but he had a team of lawyers retained even before he cast his ballot in for presidency so who’s money was that? It certainly wasn’t his money

        • Read an article awhile back that stating that in 2000 or so a certain organization was hearing chatter coming out of Saudi Arabia about America having a Muslim president in the near future. Believe Saudi Arabia was funding and still is funding him and Hillary.

          • America was founded upon religious freedom.
            Islam was part of America before we became a nation.

            America’s longest ally is a Muslim country — Morocco, 225 years.
            In fact, America has many Muslim allies: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Uzbekistan, Bahrain, Myanmar, Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, Rwanda, Cambodia, Honduras, Uganda, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Kyrgyzstan, Kenya, Rwanda, Djibouti, Morocco, Kazakhstan and Turkey.

          • America was founded on Christian religious freedom and the founders stated that quite clearly. They also clearly stated that this nation couldn’t endure without Christian values.

          • . “We have abundant reason to rejoice that in this Land the light of truth and reason has triumphed over the power of bigotry and superstition… In this enlightened Age and in this Land of equal liberty it is our boast, that a man’s religious tenets will not forfeit the protection of the Laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining and holding the highest Offices that are known in the United States.”
            ~Founding Father George Washington, letter to the members of the New Church in Baltimore, January 27, 1793

          • Get behind me satan.

            You are a fool and that’s OK with me. This world is all about choice and clearly you have chosen.

            Again, it’s all based on Christianity, not pagan or satanic religion. You are extremely twisted so get behind me.

          • Hate and bigotry are Satan’s tools. He has you well controlled.

          • Get behind me satan. You are twisted and I”ll have none of your satanic nonsense.

          • Hate is a tool of the devil. God is love, and the devil is hate. The Holy Scriptures tell us all that people who hate do not know God, because God is love.

          • If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. 1 John 4:12

          • If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he that seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? 1 John 4:20

          • Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. 1 John 3:15

          • sus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Matthew 22:37-39

          • Hate and bigotry are the Muslims creed and you are right they are the Muslims tools.

          • Who taught you those lies? Why do you spew religious hate?

          • All anyone has to do is research Islam, those so called lies were direct passages from the Quran exhorting Muslims to commit acts of violence. I can see that the truth disturbs you well that is too bad but yes you are told that you can lie about this religion and its intent by the Quran that allows Taqiyya
            Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to “smooth over differences.”

            There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

            Quran (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

            Quran (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves” against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel that way..

            Quran (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway. (The next verse refers only to those who have a personal agreement with Muhammad as individuals – see Ibn Kathir (vol 4, p 49)

            Quran (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

            Quran (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

            Quran (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means ‘deceit’. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

            Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be “compelled” to deceive others for a greater purpose.

            From Islamic Law:

            Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 – 8.2) – “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression…

            “One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.”

          • The Bible and the Koran both say “Kill the Nonbelievers”.

            If your brother, the son of your father or of your mother, or your son or daughter, … tries to secretly seduce you, saying, “Let us go and serve other gods,” … you must kill him … . You must stone him to death since he has tried to divert you from Yahweh your God. Deuteronomy 13: 7-11

          • Those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me. Luke 19:27

          • Matthew 10:34:
            Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

          • Deuteronomy 17:
            2 If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant,
            3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded;
            4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel:
            5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.

          • All anyone has to do is research Christianity, the Bible exhorts Christians to kill infadels.

          • That was back in the days of the crusades, they are not beheading, stoning raping innocent women as the Muslims are today in 2016. You need to step out of your Taqiyya ugly Muslim skin and come into the year 2016 where Muslims acting like the barbarians they are still committing atrocities against mankind. What a disgusting group of humans. That is why you cannot accept anyone’s truth telling here because that destroys the false pretense of religion of peace.

          • Dead is dead.
            The Crusades spanned 400 years. There were 12.
            Crusaders were PAID mercenaries

            They murdered both Arab and Jew — they did not ask if they were Christian, they just killed.

            .Oh, and yes they raped women and cut off peoples heads.

            They practiced canabalism.

            In order to raise a large army to fight the Arabs and Islam, Pope Urban II promised that all Crusaders would be exempted from taxes; their debts would be forgiven; their sins would be washed away; and their special place in Paradise would be guaranteed.

          • Muslims were killing Christians 450 years before the first crusades.

            Urban Legends

            The major issues people cite concerning the Crusades (when they can cite any at all) often involve some of the urban legends surrounding them. It is thought that Muslims were the innocent party and the Crusades instigated their hatred of the West, that Crusaders massacred innocent Jews and even other Christians, that children were sent to war, and that all of this was done to get rich. Perhaps worst of all, the Crusaders thought they would get away with it because the Pope promised them forgiveness of any sin committed while on Crusade. Like most urban legends, these falsehoods are based on only barely true, mostly misunderstood or misrepresented grounds.

            Aggression

            The Crusades were not simply unprovoked aggression – as noted above, they were defensive moves to protect Christendom from Muslim invasion. Muslims had been attacking Christians for more than 450 years before the First Crusade. Further, the idea that the Crusades also sparked Muslim hatred of the West is a historical falsehood. the Crusades did not do much damage to the Islamic forces, and not much notice was given to the Crusades by Muslims for several centuries. Muslims did not even seem to take active interest in the Crusades until the early 20th Century.

            Massacres

            It has been said that when the Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099 they massacred every man, woman, and child in the city until “the streets ran ankle deep with the blood.” History and science show this to be poetic hyperbole. A contemporary Muslim source has been discovered that puts the number of the slain at three thousand. Was there violence? Absolutely. In that time, a city that had to be taken by force belonged to the victorious invaders – including people. This barbaric idea actually helped lessen damaging resistance (read Josephus for what happens when this goes wrong) and so served something of a cultural purpose. Thus, while it was a tragedy by today’s standards (although one might wonder at what people in that time might think of our war tactics today), it was not uncommon back then. Further, Muslim cities that surrendered to the Crusaders were left untouched, the people retained their property, and they were allowed to worship freely.

            Anti-Semitism

            No Crusade was ever called against the Jewish people. Sadly, there were unprovoked attacks on Jewish settlements by some rogue Crusaders, but the Church actually spoke out against them and some local bishops, clergy, and laity attempted to defend the Jews against them. Again, this is comparable to modern warfare – sometimes soldiers go off and commit horrible acts during war – but that is not an indictment on the legitimacy of the war itself, nor of the ruling authority (provided it did not command nor overlook such acts).

          • You must not be reading the posts on this site.
            Why do you lie?

          • No, I don’t lie, I tell it like it is…. NO TAQIYYA for me. Apparently you are to dumb to appreciate the truth.

            I do not read every post on this site, unlike you I have a life. I get involved in things, I do not sit in front of a computer 24/7 like you just waiting for someone to post something so that you can post some BS trying to show people how intelligent you think you are. Don’t know and don’t care if you are a woman, man, Muslim or whatever religion you might follow , don’t care how intelligent and knowledgeable you think you are. You Are Not Worth My Time and Effort and am sick of hearing Islam has nothing
            to do with terrorism (it has everything to do with it).

            Thou Shalt Not Kill (that is what a true God tells his followers)

            Father of slain Muslim soldier says that terrorists “have nothing to do with Islam”

            July 31, 2016 1:40 pm By
            Robert Spencer
            148 Comments

            Trump is right: “The real problem here are the radical Islamic
            terrorists who killed” Khizr Khan’s son, but Khizr seems much more
            worked up about Trump than about jihad terror.

            And jihad terror has nothing to do with Islam? Really? We constantly are told this, but the repetition doesn’t make it true.

            In the first place, jihadis repeatedly make clear that they think what they’re doing has everything to do with Islam:

            “Jihad was a way of life for the Pious Predecessors (Salaf-us-Salih),
            and the Prophet (SAWS) was a master of the Mujahideen and a model for
            fortunate inexperienced people. The total number of military excursions
            which he (SAWS) accompanied was 27. He himself
            fought in nine of these; namely Badr; Uhud, Al-Muraysi, The Trench,
            Qurayzah, Khaybar, The Conquest of Makkah, Hunayn and Taif . . . This
            means that the Messenger of Allah (SAWS) used to go out on military
            expeditions or send out an army at least every two
            months.” — Abdullah Azzam, co-founder of al-Qaeda, Join the Caravan, p. 30

            “If we follow the rules of interpretation developed from the
            classical science of Koranic interpretation, it is not possible to
            condemn terrorism in religious terms. It remains completely true to the
            classical rules in its evolution of sanctity for its own
            justification. This is where the secret of its theological strength
            lies.” — Egyptian scholar Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd

            “Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform
            the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
            Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing
            you, responding back to your attacks, are all considered
            to be great legitimate duty in our religion.” —
            Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow 9/11 defendants

            “Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage
            jihad. We only fulfil God’s orders. Only jihad can bring peace to the
            world.” —

            Taliban terrorist Baitullah Mehsud

            “Jihad, holy fighting in Allah’s course, with full force of numbers
            and weaponry, is given the utmost importance in Islam….By jihad, Islam
            is established….By abandoning jihad, may Allah protect us from that,
            Islam is destroyed, and Muslims go into inferior
            position, their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and
            authority vanish. Jihad is an obligation and duty in Islam on every
            Muslim.” —

            Times Square car bomb terrorist Faisal Shahzad

            “So step by step I became a religiously devout Muslim, Mujahid — meaning one who participates in jihad.” —

            Little Rock, Arkansas terrorist murderer Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad

            “And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build
            explosives, and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it
            is time for Jihad.” —

            Texas terrorist bomber Khalid Aldawsari

            All of these, of course, may be dismissed as “extremists,” although
            they were also all devout Muslims who were determined to follow their
            religion properly. One finds the same thing, however, when one turns to
            the authoritative sources in Sunni Islam, the
            schools of Sunni jurisprudence (madhahib):

            Shafi’i school: A Shafi’i manual of Islamic law that was
            certified in 1991 by the clerics at Al-Azhar University, one of the
            leading authorities in the Islamic world, as a reliable guide to Sunni
            orthodoxy, stipulates about jihad that “the caliph
            makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…until they become
            Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax.” It adds a comment by Sheikh Nuh
            “˜Ali Salman, a Jordanian expert on Islamic jurisprudence: the caliph
            wages this war only “provided that he has first
            invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith
            and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the
            social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)…while
            remaining in their ancestral religions.” (‘Umdat
            al-Salik, o9.8).

            Of course, there is no caliph today, and hence the oft-repeated claim
            that Osama et al are waging jihad illegitimately, as no state authority
            has authorized their jihad. But they explain their actions in terms of
            defensive jihad, which needs no state authority
            to call it, and becomes “obligatory for everyone” (‘Umdat al-Salik,
            o9.3) if a Muslim land is attacked. The end of the defensive jihad,
            however, is not peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims as equals:
            ‘Umdat al-Salik specifies that the warfare against non-Muslims
            must continue until “the final descent of Jesus.” After that, “nothing
            but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only
            effective until Jesus’ descent” (o9.8).

            Hanafi school: A Hanafi manual of Islamic law repeats the
            same injunctions. It insists that people must be called to embrace Islam
            before being fought, “because the Prophet so instructed his commanders,
            directing them to call the infidels to the
            faith.” It emphasizes that jihad must not be waged for economic gain,
            but solely for religious reasons: from the call to Islam “the people
            will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and
            not for the sake of taking their property, or
            making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is
            possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save
            themselves from the troubles of war.”

            However, “if the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent
            to it nor agree to pay capitation tax [jizya], it is then incumbent on
            the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them,
            because God is the assistant of those who serve
            Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is
            necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover,
            commands us so to do.” (Al-Hidayah, II.140)

            Maliki school: Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering
            historian and philosopher, was also a Maliki legal theorist. In his
            renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that
            “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious
            duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the
            obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by
            force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned
            with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation
            to gain power over other nations.”

            Hanbali school: The great medieval theorist of what is
            commonly known today as radical or fundamentalist Islam, Ibn Taymiyya
            (Taqi al-Din Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, 1263-1328), was a Hanbali jurist. He
            directed that “since lawful warfare is essentially
            jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and
            God’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who
            stand in the way of this aim must be fought.”

            This is also taught by modern-day scholars of Islam. Majid Khadduri
            was an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown. In his book
            War and Peace in the Law of Islam, which was published in 1955
            and remains one of the most lucid and illuminating works on the subject,
            Khadduri says this about jihad:

            The state which is regarded as the instrument for universalizing a
            certain religion must perforce be an ever expanding state. The Islamic
            state, whose principal function was to put God’s law into practice,
            sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning
            ideology over the entire world….The jihad was therefore employed as an
            instrument for both the universalization of religion and the
            establishment of an imperial world state. (P. 51)

            Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Assistant Professor on the Faculty of
            Shari’ah and Law of the International Islamic University in Islamabad.
            In his 1994 book
            The Methodology of Ijtihad, he quotes the twelfth century
            Maliki jurist Ibn Rushd: “Muslim jurists agreed that the purpose of
            fighting with the People of the Book…is one of two things: it is either
            their conversion to Islam or the payment of jizyah.”
            Nyazee concludes: “This leaves no doubt that the primary goal of the
            Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of
            Allah through jihad, and the option of poll-tax [jizya] is to be
            exercised only after subjugation” of non-Muslims.

            All this doesn’t sound like a religion that has nothing to do with
            terrorism. And then there are the many passages of the Qur’an exhorting
            Muslims to commit acts of violence:

            2:191-193: “And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them
            from where they expelled you; persecution is more grievous than
            slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight
            you there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such
            is the recompense of unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah
            is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no
            persecution and the religion is Allah’s; then if they give over, there
            shall be no enmity save for evildoers.”

            4:89: “They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and
            then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of
            them, until they emigrate in the way of Allah; then, if they turn their
            backs, take them, and slay them wherever you
            find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper.”

            5:33: “This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and
            His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they
            shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall
            alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished
            from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the
            world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement.”

            5:38: “And the thief, male and female: cut off the hands of both, as a
            recompense for what they have earned, and a punishment exemplary from
            Allah; Allah is All-mighty, All-wise.”

            8:12: “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so
            confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror;
            so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!”

            8:39: “Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is
            Allah’s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things
            they do.”

            8:60: “Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you
            can, to terrify thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others
            besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you
            expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you
            in full; you will not be wronged.”

            9:5: “Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters
            wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in
            wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform
            the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them
            go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.”

            9:29: “Fight those who believe not in Allah and the Last Day and do
            not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as
            practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given
            the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand
            and have been humbled.”

            9:111: “Allah has bought from the believers their selves and their
            possessions against the gift of Paradise; they fight in the way of
            Allah; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise binding upon Allah
            in the Torah, and the Gospel, and the Koran; and
            who fulfils his covenant truer than Allah? So rejoice in the bargain
            you have made with Him; that is the mighty triumph.”

            9:123: “O believers, fight the unbelievers who are near to you; and
            let them find in you a harshness; and know that Allah is with the
            godfearing.”

            47:4: “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then, when
            you have made wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds; then set
            them free, either by grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads.
            So it shall be; and if Allah had willed, He
            would have avenged Himself upon them; but that He may try some of you
            by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will
            not send their works astray.”

            To be sure, there are some tolerant verses in the Qur’an as well —
            see, for example, sura 109. But then in Islamic tradition there are
            authorities who say that violent passages take precedence over these
            verses. Muhammad’s earliest biographer, an eighth-century
            Muslim named Ibn Ishaq, explains the progression of Qur’anic revelation
            about warfare. First, he explains, Allah allowed Muslims to wage
            defensive warfare. But that was not Allah’s last word on the
            circumstances in which Muslims should fight. Ibn Ishaq explains
            offensive jihad by invoking a Qur’anic verse: “Then God sent down to
            him: ‘Fight them so that there be no more seduction,’ i.e. until no
            believer is seduced from his religion. ‘And the religion is God’s’, i.e.
            Until God alone is worshipped.”

            The Qur’an verse Ibn Ishaq quotes here (2:193) commands much more
            than defensive warfare: Muslims must fight until “the religion is God’s”
            — that is, until Allah alone is worshipped. Ibn Ishaq gives no hint
            that that command died with the seventh century.

            The great medieval scholar Ibn Qayyim (1292-1350) also outlines the
            stages of the Muhammad’s prophetic career: “For thirteen years after the
            beginning of his Messengership, he called people to God through
            preaching, without fighting or Jizyah, and was commanded
            to restrain himself and to practice patience and forbearance. Then he
            was commanded to migrate, and later permission was given to fight. Then
            he was commanded to fight those who fought him, and to restrain himself
            from those who did not make war with him.
            Later he was commanded to fight the polytheists until God’s religion
            was fully established.”

            In other words, he initially could fight only defensively — only
            “those who fought him” — but later he could fight the polytheists until
            Islam was “fully established.” He could fight them even if they didn’t
            fight him first, and solely because they were
            not Muslim.

            Nor do all contemporary Islamic thinkers believe that that command is
            a relic of history. According to a 20th century Chief Justice of Saudi
            Arabia, Sheikh ‘Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid, “at first ‘the
            fighting’ was forbidden, then it was permitted and
            after that it was made obligatory.” He also distinguishes two groups
            Muslims must fight: “(1) against them who start ‘the fighting’ against
            you (Muslims) . . . (2) and against all those who worship others along
            with Allah . . . as mentioned in Surat Al-Baqarah
            (II), Al-Imran (III) and At-Taubah (IX) . . . and other Surahs
            (Chapters of the Qur’an).” (The Roman numerals after the names of the
            chapters of the Qur’an are the numbers of the suras: Sheikh ‘Abdullah is
            referring to Qur’anic verses such as 2:216, 3:157-158,
            9:5, and 9:29.)

            How does Khizr Khan explain all that? He doesn’t — and he knows that no one in the mainstream media will ask him to.

          • Blah, blah, blah, insult …repeat ad nauseam.

          • Wow, some heavy reading there. Thank you for doing all that work. I learned things I never knew but in the end my beliefs were right. Again thank you.

          • People need to start reading and informing themselves about this.

            Anything that controls a person’s life is not only a religion, but an ideology, one that demands strict obedience. Ask any woman who has ever been stoned what sharia law is. So it’s a religion, an ideology and a legal system all in one. The religion called Islam is not and never was, or ever will be a “religion of peace.” In Saudi Arabia the Quran is their Constitution.

          • Do what I did, block the useful idiot!

          • Yes, you need to put Satan behind you. Hate and lies are the Devil’s work.
            Islam is not pagan or Satanic.

            Muslims worship the same God as Jews — the Old Testament God of Abraham. Jesus is considered a prophet. The Koran contains an entire chapter honoring Mary, the mother of Jesus.

            No, America is not “based on Christianity”. Quite the contrary. Our laws are based on those of ancient Rome.

            Factually, our Founders were Unitarian, Deists and agnostic, not Christian.

          • What hasn’t been said is Islam doesn’t fit in the definition of a religion. It is a cult and is based on political beliefs . What religion these dasites rape and behead women, gays and Christians? Please don’t bring up the crusade or inquisition. We grew and by following Christ’s teachings became a loving people. How has the cult of Islam grew over the many Centuries? Sharia is the culmination of hostile and primitive beliefs.

          • Thank you. When placed in context all of your quotes all of your quotes add up to an excellent explanation of why we have no “state church” as does the U.K. and why no taxes shall be collected to support any such church. Every person is free to practice the religion of his or her choice…Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhism, Atheism or Secular Humanism (yes that is also a religion). Separation of church and state is a political doctrine associated with the first amendment but there is no such term anywhere in the Constitution. A strict interpretation and application would simply mean that no taxes be collected to support any church or religion, no religious affiliation shall be required to hold office, no law shall be enacted favoring any specific church or religion and no law shall be enacted based solely on a religious tenet unless there is a broader justification based on a societal necessity. This doctrine precludes Sharia law while permitting laws passed in conformity with our Constitution…murder, theft, etc. Here is another quote you might like.
            Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

          • First, you claim our nation is founded upon Sharia Law.

            Then you state Sharia Law is precluded.

            You need to make up your mind.

            Frankly, it appears that you have absolutely no idea what the term actually Sharia means.

          • Apparently you did not take the time to read and digest my post. What could you have possibly found in it to suggest any claim on my part that this nation was in any sense founded on Sharia Law? Any such assertion is ludicrous. My mind is clear. I don’t know what you were thinking. Duhaime’s Legal Dictionary defines Sharia Law as follows:
            Sharia Law Definition: Muslim or Islamic law, both civil and criminal justice as well as regulating individual conduct both personal and moral. Related Terms: Muslim Law, Muslim, Islamic Law. The custom-based body of law based on the Koran and the religion of Islam [see, also, the Muslim Law Dictionary]. I actually did know what Sharia law encompassed and what it was based on. I threw in the definition for your enlightenment. Now that we both know what Sharia is predicated on, I think we can at least agree that it’s tenets place it in direct conflict with our Constitution. It can never be recognized by our government as legally authoritative as to do so would violate the first amendment as well as the long established doctrine regarding separation of church and state. BTW, that quote in my post stating that our “Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people…wholly inadequate to the government of any other” was from James Madison.

          • I asked you what the term/word Sharia actually meant. I did not ask you what Sharia law was.
            Maybe you should read more carefully and assume less.
            The dictionary you need is an Arabic-English dictionary.

          • “In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is error alone that needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.”
            ~Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Horatio Spofford, 1814

          • “I am for freedom of religion and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another.”
            ~Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, letter to Elbridge Gerry, January 26, 1799

          • “The civil government functions with complete success by the total separation of the Church from the State.”
            ~Founding Father James Madison, 1819

          • “I never liked the Hierarchy of the Church — an equality in the teacher of Religion, and a dependence on the people, are republican sentiments — but if the Clergy combine, they will have their influence on Government”
            ~Founding Father Rufus King, Rufus King: American Federalist, pp. 56-57

          • “No religious doctrine shall be established by law.”
            ~Founding Father Elbridge Gerry, Annals of Congress 1:729-731

          • “Congress has no power to make any religious establishments.”
            ~Founding Father Roger Sherman, Congress, August 19, 1789

          • “The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
            —John Adams

          • “…the founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected {George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson}, not a one had professed a belief in Christianity… [Sermon by Reverend Bill Wilson (Episcopal) in October 1831, as published in the Albany Daily Advertiser the same month it was made]”

          • “I have found Christian dogma unintelligible…Some books on Deism fell into my hands…It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared much stronger than the refutations; in short I soon became a thorough deist.”
            -Benjamin Franklin, “Toward the Mystery” (autobiography)

          • “As the government of the United States of America is not on any sense founded on the Christian Religion, – as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of of Musselmen (Muslims), – and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”
            -Treaty of Tripoli, signed into law by John Adams

          • “Finally, in answer to Fortescue Aland’s question why the Ten Commandments should not now be a part of the common law of England we may say they are not because the never were.”
            -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814

          • Morocco is probably the only Muslim country that we do not pay millions to and it has always displayed pro-western sympathies. Morocco has been instrumental in supporting the USA and declaring solidarity in fighting terrorism. The others most of which are nothing but breeding grounds for terrorist get plenty of American money. As far as I can remember outside of that treaty with Morocco there were never any Muslims in my history books that had any bearing on this country what so ever that is until Obama came into office and starting bringing Islamic terrorist into this country. This is a democracy with freedom of religion where we have tolerance for the religion of others, tolerance for the way people live their lives, etc. I do not see Islam as a religion it is a barbaric inhuman way of life that wants to control people, laws, etc it has no tolerance for other religions, no tolerance for freedom nor democracy. Islam does not belong in this country because it cannot and does not know how to live in a democracy. They are brainwashed to believe that Sharia Law is the only law. I have seen how progressive Afghanistan and other countries in that area were back in the 1970’s and I see the destruction that Islam has brought to these same places today.

          • Islam is an Abrahbic religion.
            Your opinion has no official effect, however, it serves to embarass America.

          • Here are examples of non-Islamic terrorism that have occurred in the United States in the last 30 years. All of them are related to the religious extremists, none of which is Muslim. The list is simply a sample, it is not all-inclusive.

            1. Wisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, Aug. 5, 2012.
            2. The murder of Dr. George Tiller, May 31, 2009.
            3. Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church shooting, July 27, 2008.
            4. The murder of Barnett Slepian by James Charles Kopp, Oct. 23, 1998.
            5. The Centennial Olympic Park bombing, July 27, 1996.
            6. The murder of Dr. John Britton, July 29, 1994.
            7. Planned Parenthood bombing, Brookline, Massachusetts, 1994.
            8. Suicide attack on IRS building in Austin, Texas, Feb. 18, 2010.
            9. The murder of Alan Berg, June 18, 1984.
            10. Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, April 19, 1995.
            11. The Knoxville Unitarian Universalist Church Shooting
            12. The Campaign of Terror Against Abortion Doctors
            13. Everything The Ku Klux Klan Has Ever Done
            14. The Massacre At Zion Emmanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.

            The rampant xenophobia that has taken hold of the Republican Party is an affront to everything this nation stands for. Terrorism spawns from the desperation of humankind, and for that, we are all guilty.

          • I am well aware of the above mentioned non-Islamic terrorist acts done by sick minded people. I am a Democrat who actually sees what is happening. Islam is a religion that teaches NO tolerance for any other religion, no tolerance for LGTB people, this religion demeans and abuses woman. It allows rape of women who are not Muslim. It allows husbands to kill their wives if they do something that supposedly causes shame. It allows lies to further its agenda. It allows for the stoning to death or beheading of someone who does not follow or who has somehow done something that the religion does not approve of. The Muslims were a big part of Hitlers reign to kill all jews. Yes sick minded Christians and people of various religions do kill but they do not follow a book (Quran) that consistently pushes for death of infidels. I do not see Muslims assimilating into any culture of any country they are in and why is that? Their Sharia Law should be banned from every country outside of the Middle East. Why hasn’t Saudi Arabia whose constitution is the Quran welcomed all these Muslim refugees? Is it because they want

          • Your knowledge of Islam is limited to that provided by news-speak. Your knowlesge of Christianity seems to be at that level as well. The Christian Bible commands infidels be killed.

          • My knowledge is not limited ed or totally provided by news-speak.The Christian Bible may of said that but I don’t see Christians acting like the Islamic terrorist taking over cities, killing and abusing woman, trying to force their barbaric unholy religion on everyone. I see you must be a Muslim following the rule of Taqiyya. Well now sense in going any further since you are allowed to continually lie about the religion of non peace

          • Islam is the world’s second largest religion — 1.6 billion Muslims.

            All Muslims are not terrorists. All terorists are not Muslims/

            Like Catholics in Africa and Christians in the U.S, a small number of extremists
            in the Middle East are using relgion as an excuse to murder.

            As a Christian, I am forbidden to lie. Ignorance is no lomger your excuse for lying.

          • No not all Muslims are terrorists, but the majority of terrorists 99.9% are Muslim. Why don’t Muslims want to assimilate into the countries that they are moving into??????? Is it the Quran and Sharia law if that is the case then they are what we think they are?

            I am not a liar and I am not ignorant, I am very blunt with the truth.. Personally lying is one of my pet peeves, I don’t condone it and lose respect for people that do I hate people that lie and Muslims seem to fit into that group with their Taqiyya.

          • THE UNITED STATES IS A REPUBLIC.

            THE UNITED STATES IS NOT NOW, NOR HAS IT EVER BEEN A DEMoCRACY.

          • Nope, not since the 14th Amendment was ratified. Lincoln & Co. killed the Republic.

          • OMG, another rabid Confederate. Honeychild, the War ended a ling time ago. We lost.

          • I’m talking about the Constitution, not the Civil War. Where the hell did you come up with that crap?

          • Lincoln was murdered before the 13th Amendment was ratified.

          • Lincoln opened the door when he invaded the South and trashed the Constitution.

          • Yes it is constitution-based federal republic but it is also a democratic republic.

            The United States is a democracy because the authority of the government arises from the people.

            Jefferson said it best in the Declaration of Independence:

            …to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it… [Emphasis added]

            Many of the people reciting the republic-not-a-democracy line assume that a democracy is adirect democracy in which the people directly make the laws. This is just plain false, and a misunderstanding of the meaning of the term.

            The USA is a democratic republic. Unfortunately, that particular phrase has been abused by all sorts of totalitarian regimes, so a certain smell attaches to it. Nevertheless, it is an accurate description of the situation. You can say “republican democracy” if it makes you feel better.

          • America is not a democracy. It is not, never was, nor ever was intended to be a democracy.

            A democracy is a form of government in which the people decide policy matters directly–through town hall meetings or by voting on ballot initiatives and referendums.

            It is time we put an end to this misconception about democracy. America is a republic.

          • ———–brought on by islam & their stupid, barbaric ignorant so-called religion. You would think after some 1400 yrs., they would have progressed in their thinking, & cut out some of their barbaric ways, like wife-beatings, child-raping, honor-killings & other acts of violence. They are incapable of thinking anything, but what their wonderful, spiritual leader has told them in their most glorious Quran. Yes after 1400 yrs., they are still ignorant & stupid. I would like to know what Mohamed did that was so special for the muslim ppl. Did he enlighten them with all this great learning they don’t have?

          • They are all brainwashed. They have to keep repeating the Quran until it is memorized and it makes them brain dead to any other ways but their own barbaric ways taught in reading the Quran

          • Do not respond to this person. She is not a born-again Christian.
            This is a demonic entity, posing as a ‘Christian’
            and does not have the spiritual insight nor love nor
            comprehension needed to face the reality of our
            contemporary society.

            She is a demon. I believe this, totally. Anyone who
            defends the ISIS cultural barbarians, is not of God.

          • Maybe you should pay closer attention to what happens in other countries?
            Start with the Central African Republic
            I tell no lies.
            Islam is no more barbaric that Christianity.

          • Islam is no more barbaric that Christianity. However, Christisns have been at the violence and killing a bit longer. Here is a small sample:

            The Crusades, The Inquisition, The witch hunts, The Peasants War, French Wars of rebellion, Massacre at Vassy, The Thirty Years War, Pope Sixtus V, Irish Rebellion, Democide in the Americas, Democide in Africa, Democide in Australia, The papal bull Romanus Pontifex – 1455, Slavery in the Americas, Leopold II, King of the Belgians – butcher of the Congo Free State 1885-1908, The Holocaust, Catholic Nazi State in Croatia, Lebanon War, Sabta and Shatila Massacre, Serb Orthodox genocide, Protestant death squads in Ireland, The Rwandan genocide,
            Zimbabwe — Catholic protection of Mugabe, Lord’s Resistance Army, Central African Republic Catholic murdering of those who won’t convert …, Americans killing physicians and bombing medical clinics, American killing church congregations, America – the KKK murders (they are now international terrorists).

          • A wolverine in sheep’s clothing…go away, please, and do not darken this doorway again.

          • Truth and fact does not seem to sit very well with you.

          • Luke 19:27:
            But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

          • Matthew 10:34:
            Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

          • Are you muslim? Are you saying that muslims are law-abiding, piece-loving, non-violent, ppl. who just want to live their lives, raise their numerous children? Then why is it, here lately, you turn on the news & there is some radical muslim terrorist who has shot up some place & killed & maimed a bunch of ppl. Give me a break!!!!, none of the events you cherry-picked may not have been committed by muslims, perhaps there weren’t that many of you here then, muslims have made up for lost time since they have been increasing in numbers.

          • There are 1.6 BILLION Muslims.

            Use your head for thinking instead of vomiting news-speak

          • You are so on the money. I have been saying that for sometime. Islam is not a religion, it only masquerades as one to benefit from our Freedom O Religion laws. Our politicians in Wash. should see this, but I guess they want to be PC. I have nothing against them coming here if they want to accept our culture, live by our laws, pledge allegiance to our flag & become true Americans, if they want to change our country to accommodate their barbaric, idiotic shira laws, then they need to stay the heck out of our country, period, & we need to stop them from coming here.

          • So what?

          • Because Saudi Arabia is the scum of the earth…………

        • \
          Your personal records are sealed.
          Your school records are sealed.
          It does not cost a dime.
          It is the law.

          • you repeat the same thing without any proof!

          • Apparently, you have not tried to obtain a copy of your birth certificate in thw past 20 years.

            I am also quite certain you have not aplied for admission to college.

          • apparently you haven’t researched the non existent life of one Barry Soetoro aka Barack Huesein Obama like I have since 2007 and lots of what use to be there was quickly deleted after he was nominated

          • Why do you need to tell this lie?

            Why do you embarrass America this way?

            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?

            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          • I speak the truth and all you can do is rebutt with no defense.If I had the power to deport Un-American citizens you would be the first ! You are so gullible to believe obama that you reek of his rectum!

          • !! Thank you.

          • School records are private per the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.

            In Hawaii, HRS §338-18 forbids anyone without a “direct and tangible interest” from accessing vital personal records such as birth certificates.

            It does not cost a dime.

        • Like I said previously, I think George Soros has backed him all the way.

      • ”’
        Your personal records are sealed.
        Your school records are sealed.
        It does not cost a dime.
        It is the law.

    • Soro’s money.

      • ..
        Your personal records are sealed.
        Your school records are sealed.
        It does not cost a dime.
        It is the law.

        • And removing you from my sight does not cost a dime either, AKperson!

        • Really? Get one of the many detective search sites and you can find out just about all you want to know. Most people don’t realize that graduation announcements tell you where they graduated. Birth announcements tell where , when and what time you were born. DMV has a bunch of info you can get into. So yes most of your life can be accessed. It take a lot of time and major work to get it all hidden. Then it just takes a hacker to blow it all up. There is nothing that a person can’t find out about another.

          • Graduation announcements no longer publish names..

            Birth announcements are no longer published.

            You cannot access DMV records, except in limited circumstances.

            However, you can access court records, except those of juvinile and family courts.

          • Then my program must be illegal. I am not talking about now. Felonious Hillary and Mr. Trumps birth and graduation had public announcements. I can find just about anyone’s that is old enough to hold office. Even not being made public. This isn’t Russia. Your birth and graduation are public whether they announce or not. Their so called seal is easy to get through.

          • They still announce at least in some areas births in the newspapers and in their on-line counter parts just like they announce obituaries.

          • So you don’t have any info on your driver’s license.? Hmm, weird. How do you identify yourself? How many credit applications have you filled out? How about your credit score? How do those looking for your credit rating get your score? You must live in a vacuum.

        • They are not sealed. My God ! Where do you live? My niece and son graduated it was announced . Look in the Newspaper. Weddings, births and those who just became citizens are announced. Unless you live in a socialist State.

    • Your personal records are sealed.
      Your school records are sealed.
      It does not cost a dime.
      It is the law.

      • So when did the law stop your personal info from getting out? Your graduation are public record as is your citizenship. So is your birth. He is hiding things and with a lot of help washed almost all of his past and records of it away. Not an easy task at all. Your social security number has been used so much during your life that even that is open to being found. So how does a man’s past become so blurred? This question will be answered in time but how much time is the real question. It will take dedicated people who aren’t afraid to risk all if found out before the truth is made public. Either that or Obamas birth was the only truth he has told. Sounds like a good mystery novel that has all American citizens as the victims.

        • Sorry, you are terribly misinformed. Names of graduates have not been published for decades. No one’s citizenship is published.

      • what law you speaking of? when it comes to elected officials there can be no hidden records

        • Where did you come up with that foolishness?

          • Where did you get Yours? What law is it that protects all this info? To get a copy of your birth certificate is easy. Know where and when you were born and your parents info. All easy info to get. As for college, as long as you sign loan papers they will allow you in as whoever you say you are. Marriage is also put in news papers. Are you from California by chance? Maybe New York? They are outside the Constitution so they don’t count. Just like New Jersey.

          • You have not requested a birth certificate copy in the past 10 years.

            Here is Alaska’s requirements. educate yourself: http://dhss.alaska.gov/dph/VitalStats/Pages/birth/default.aspx

          • That’s Alaska. Which is weird in itself because communist States do that not free ones. When us free people have children and they grow and get married we love announcing bothave birth and marriage. Unless you live in a bubble that info is out there somewhere. Have you posted online or in a text about a birth or marriage? If so it is accessible. Get your credit score online? It is accessible. So those laws no matter how unconstitutional won’the help unless you live in a bubble. I can’t believe your name and birthday aren’t on your driver’s license. That is really weird too. Stop with the ” it is illegal here ” talk. Those laws only work if you never give the info out. Once you do it is public.

          • It is post 9/11 America.

            It is post identity theft America.

            Suggest you actually check law instead of insulting people.

            Your communist insult is pure ignorance.

            There is a huge difference between Alaska and the other 49 states: Alaska was bought, not conquered. We the People demanded payment for our land.

            It is called Capitalism.

          • Damn your hard headed. I am not trying to prove there aren’t laws. Just that all people make certain things in their life open to the public even if they aren’t aware of it.

    • I believe that Obama himself was the original birther. There is some evidence that he claimed to have been born in Kenya when it suited his advantage to sell a book. I believe he claimed to have been born in Kenya to get into Columbia and Harvard. That is why he wont release his records.

      • September 23, 2008

        How exactly did Barack Obama pay for his Harvard Law School education?

        The way the Obama campaign has answered the question was simply hard work and student loans.

        But new questions have been raised about Obama’s student loans and Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.

        The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

        In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

        Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

        Prince Alwaleed catapulted to fame in the United States after the September 11 attacks, when New York mayor Rudy Guiliani refused his $10 million check to help rebuild Manhattan, because the Saudi prince hinted publicly that America’s pro-Israel policies were to blame for the attacks.

        Sutton knew Al-Mansour well, since the two men had been business partners and served on several corporate boards together.

        As Sutton remembered, Al-Mansour was raising money for Obama’s education and seeking recommendations for him to attend Harvard Law School.

        “I was introduced to (Obama) by a friend who was raising money for him,” Sutton told NY1 city hall reporter Dominic Carter. “The friend’s name is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, from Texas.”

        Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told Newsmax that Sutton’s account was “bogus” and a “fabrication that has been retracted” by a spokesman for the Sutton family.

        He referred Newsmax to a pro-Obama blog published on Politico.com by reporter Ben Smith.

        In a September 3 blog entry, Smith wrote that “a spokesman for Sutton’s family, Kevin Wardally” said that Sutton had been mistaken when he made those comments about Obama and Khalid Al-Mansour.

        Smith suggested the retraction “put the [Obama/Al-Mansour] story to rest for good.”

        Wardally told Smith that the “information Mr. Percy Sutton imported [sic] on March 25 in a NY1 News interview regarding his connection to Barack Obama is inaccurate. As best as our family and the Chairman’s closest friends can tell, Mr. Sutton, now 86 years of age, misspoke in describing certain details and events in that television interview.”

        Asked which parts of Percy Sutton’s statements were a “fabrication,” LaBolt said “all of it. Al Mansour doesn’t know Obama. And Sutton’s spokesman retracted the story. The letter [to Harvard, which Percy Sutton says he wrote on behalf of Obama], the ‘payments for loans’ – all of it, not true,” he added.

        Newsmax contacted the Sutton family and they categorically denied Wardally’s claims to Smith and the Politico.com. So there was no retraction of Sutton’s original interview, during which he revealed that Khalid Al-Mansour was “raising money” for Obama and had asked Sutton to write a letter of recommendation for Obama to help him get accepted at Harvard Law School.

        Sutton’s personal assistant told Newsmax that neither Mr. Sutton or his family had ever heard of Kevin Wardally.

        “Who is this person?” asked Sutton’s assistant, Karen Malone.

        When told that he portrayed himself as a “spokesman” for the family, Malone told Newsmax, “Well, he’s not.”

        According to a 2006 New York magazine profile, Wardally is part of a “New New Guard” in Harlem politics that has been challenging the “lions” of the old guard, Charles Rangel and Percy Sutton. That makes him an unlikely candidate to speak on behalf of Sutton.

        Sutton maintains an office at the Manhattan headquarters of the firm he founded, Inner City Broadcasting Corporation. ICBC owns New York radio stations WBLS and WLIB.

        Sutton’s son Pierre (“Pepe”) runs ICBC along with his daughter, Keisha Sutton-James. Malone told Newsmax that she had consulted with Sutton’s family members at the station and confirmed that no one knew Kevin Wardally or had authorized him to speak on behalf of the family.

        For someone claiming to be a “spokesman” for the Sutton family, who was authorized to call Percy Sutton a liar, Wardally even got Percy Sutton’s age wrong.

        Sutton is not 86, as Wardally said, but close to 88. He was born on Nov. 24, 1920.

        Wardally responded to a several Newsmax phone messages and emails with a terse one-line comment, maintaining his statement that Percy Sutton “misspoke” in the television interview.

        “I believe the statement speaks for itself and the Sutton Family and I have nothing further to say on the topic,” he wrote in an email.

        Asked to explain why it was that no one at Inner City Broadcasting Corp. knew of him or accepted him as a family spokesman, Wardally responded later that he had been retained by a nephew of the elder Sutton, who “is in our office almost every week.”

        Wardally works for Bill Lynch Associations, a Harlem political consulting firm. The nephew, Chuck Sutton, no longer works with the elder Sutton at Inner City Broadcasting, but for a high-tech start-up called Synematics.

        “Percy Sutton doesn’t go out idly on television saying things he doesn’t mean,” a well-connected black entrepreneur who knows Sutton told Newsmax.

        Ben LaBolt’s claim that “Al Mansour doesn’t know Obama” was contradicted by Al Mansour himself in an extended interview with Newsmax.

        Comparing the revelation of his ties to Obama to the controversy surrounding Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Al Mansour said that he was determined to keep a low profile to avoid embarrassing Obama.

        “In respect to Mr. Obama, I have told him, because so many people are running after him… I was determined that I was never going to be in that situation,” he told Newsmax.

        Al Mansour said he was deliberately avoiding any contact with the candidate. “I’m not involved in any way in celebrity sweepstakes,” he said. “I wish him well, anything I can do if he lets me know, I’ll let him know what I think I can do or can’t. But I don’t collect autographs. I wish him the best, and hope he can win the election.”

        He repeatedly declined to comment on the Percy Sutton allegations, either to confirm or to deny them.

        “Any statement that I make would only further the activity which is not in the interest of Barack, not in the interest of Percy, not in the interest of anyone,” Al Mansour said.

        Unanswered Questions

        Sen. Obama has refused to instruct Harvard Law School to release any information about his time there as a student, or about his student loans.

        Newsmax contacted the Dean of Students, the Director of Student Financial Services, the Registrar, and the Bursar of Harvard Law School. None would provide any specific information on Barack Obama’s time at Harvard, except for his dates of attendance (1988-1991) or his year of graduation, 1991.

        A spokesman for the law school, Michael Armini, said it was Harvard policy not to divulge information on alumni without their approval.

        “There are lots of reporters nosing around the library,” he acknowledged. So far, none had turned up any new information.

        Law professors Lawrence Tribe and Charles Ogletree have both said publicly that they were “impressed” by Obama when he was a student.

        Sources close to the Sutton family told Newsmax that Percy Sutton wrote a letter of recommendation for Obama to Ogletree at Khalid Al-Mansour’s request, but Ogletree declined to answer Newsmax questions about this.

        Harvard Law School spokesman Michael Armini said that Harvard was “very generous” with financial aid, but only on the basis on need.

        The Obama campaign told Newsmax that Obama self-financed his three years at Harvard Law School with loans, and did not receive any scholarship from Harvard Law school.

        LaBolt denied that Obama received any financial assistance from Harvard or from outside parties. “No – he paid his way through by taking out loans,” he said in an email to Newsmax.

        At the time, Harvard cost around $25,000 a year, or $75,000 for the three years that Obama attended. And as president of the Harvard Law Review, he received no stipend from the school, Harvard spokesman Mike Armini said.

        “That is considered a volunteer position,” Armini said. “There is no salary or grant associated with it.”

        So if the figures cited by the Obama campaign for the Senator’s student loans are accurate, that means that Obama came up with more than $32,000 over three years from sources other than loans to pay for tuition, room and board.

        Where did he find the money? Did it come from friends of Khalid Al Mansour? And why would a radical Muslim activist with ties to the Saudi royal family be raising money for Barack Obama?

    • Obama will lose the ability to hide his lies once out of office. The full weight of the truth will bear down on his so called legacy. Of course there is more to it than that. It is why so many establishment politicians have been trying to sabotage Trumps campaign. They all knew the truth and we’re complicit in making a noncitizen President. A lie like this isn’t able to stay hidden without a lot of help. The well played puppet show by some demanding to know ,knew it would never come out as long as Democrats were in charge and they stayed in office. Believe me, the hammer will fall and some will be very surprised at who all is part of it. Now we for a nonconspiracy comment. Vote Trump. If you want the vale lifted. God bless and again God bless our free nation.

      • Tom Buyea -- Fla.News service

        WE have to get this SOB Out of Office first ! I think he will engineer some National Emergency and postpone the Election or the swearing in of a new President and try to stay in power, I hope the US Military Says NO !!! ? and if Obama wants to have a war between his SS and Our Military ? Bring it on !!! (;^))

        • He may be ignorant but he’s not that stupid. They will try to rig the polls but now that it has been on blogs and news it would be tough to get away with it. They are real desperate. To the point of trying to find a replacement.

          • In my humble opinion, first of all we need to be certain that the votes in our elections are correctly counted. Almost all voting today is done electronically on voting machines, and from what I have read online, most of these machines are “serviced and maintained” by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Since they are a substantial donor to the democrat’s agenda, I believe their results deserve our scrutiny…………and NO! He is neither ignorant nor stupid—-he has his own set agenda, and he is sticking to it!

    • If I had but one guess, it would be , George Soros. Whether it is a legitimate certificate or not, I think a lot of ppl. feel as I do, He is not a red-blooded, USA loving, AMERICAN, football loving as most of us. He was not raised here, he doesn’t know & understand our culture, our history, our culture. He does not believe in American Exceptionalism. He has not tried to bring us together, but rather has tried every technique he & Soros can think of to divide us, blacks against whites, rich against poor, democrats against re-pubs I cannot comprehend how anyone in their right mind Thinks we need four more yrs. of the same under HRC. It would be a disaster. She does well to get up in the mornings & get her cloths on right side out. She definitely does not have the integrity, & the moral character or the wisdom to make big decisions. I am hoping she loses big time in Nov.

      • yes everything you said is correct and we must do everything we can to stop HRC from stealing the office of presidency even if it means doing the same things the Democrats have done by stealing the past 2 elections. A thief can’t complain to anyone when another person beats them at their own game!

      • Let’s face it… she funded ISIS..she is a criminal through and through. Liar, let the Benghazi guys die, and said ‘what difference does it make?’
        Years ago she defended a child molester, the guy raped a kid, and she defended him and laughed about letting him go free.
        What kind of a human is this?
        I am learning through all of the daily news how deeply corrupted these people in the D.C. kingdom really are.
        They are beyond redemption and when they die, their fate is the fire of hell.
        I just wish it were sooner
        not later.

      • Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !os608f:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !os608f:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash908MediaDayGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!os608f:….,….

    • Because it is all phoney and false. Even during his College days he applied for a grant because he was from another country and needed help. Even his college records are closed. He has been trained for this job by the best I assume as he has bilked Americans to believe he is trully an American of which he isn’t.

  5. False, Trump just muddied the water. There is ZERO proof that Obama was born in the USofA but it is really irrelevant, Daddy Obama was a foreign national. Obama, Jr. was born a Kenyan national and a British subject. He is not a natural born Citizen, is not eligible to be POTUS and is a usurper squatting in the Oval Office.

    SUCK IT, TRUMP!

    • We know that Pharaoh Barry in neither qualified as an American citizen at all, let alone natural-born, nor is he fit to lead America except down the maelstrom of destruction, but why don’t we just let the matter rest and take care of itself, as it will. “Vengeance is mine. I will repay,” says Almighty Yahuwah, and He knows better how to repay scoffers than any of us.

      In the meantime, let’s not continue the degradation by allowing Bonnie-&-Clyde-on-steroids Clinton back into the White House.

      TRUMP-PENCE 2016!

    • Did you know that a lot pf people hated Herbert Hoover and Nixon resigned?

      ‘Bout as important now as where his Royal Exalted Boma was born. It’s over Paul. Maybe there might be an actual honest investigation after Jan. 20th but for now it’s the Cackling Witch that’s the current problem so screw Oboma. It’s mine over matter. I don’t mind ’cause he don’t matter.

      Trump for the White House
      Clinton for the BIG house !

    • “Suck it, Trump”? How is this a bad thing for Trump? I think you’ve missed the point. Whether or not it’s true that O was born in Kenya or Hawaii, Trump made the media focus on it, speculate that he was going to promote the birther thing again, say how stupid it was, yet then he came out and put an end to it – after making them listen to a half hour of top military brass praising America and endorsing him. Icing on the cake is that in their frantic research into birther statements trying to make a fool out of Trump the media found out that Hillary staff DID indeed spread the rumor. Now the media is furiously back pedaling, acting like it’s not important even if her staff did start it. Hypocrites played brilliantly by Trump.

      • He did a great job of thickening the smokescreen. The issue is daddy, not the place of birth.

        • No, Paul, the issue is a parent — one parent, gender is not relevant.
          So sayth the U.S. Suprwme Court.
          American women have full citizenship and voting rights.

          I suggest you don’t play your citizenship game with our Military members and their spouses.

          • Nope, daddy only. Mommy can tag along though.

          • Amendment XIV
            Section 1.
            All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

        • At this point, IMO the issue is how he showcased and used their hypocrisy against them. The birther issue itself, whether it is bc of birth place or parents, is dead considering O is on his way out.
          Hopefully those people who trusted the media and didn’t look into things for themselves have learned a lesson. Seemingly not, considering how they support Hillary.

    • Obama’s mother was an American citizen.
      All it takes is one.
      Where you arew born is not an issue.

  6. VIDEO: Obama admits he was born in KENYA:
    http://www.facebook.com/TheAmericanDogParty/videos/vb.1794227654146907/1796395153930157/?type=2&theater
    UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh, who has said that in the hypothetical scenario that Obama was born outside the U.S., he would not be a natural-born citizen, since the then-applicable law would have required Obama’s mother to have been in the U.S. at least “five years after the age of 14”, but Ann Dunham was three months shy of her 19th birthday when Obama was born.

  7. We will be greater then ever with Trump our leader..will be interesting indeed how he is treated by the press then….they are digging themselves into a big hole those reporters who were Killery’s lap dogs. Will be looking for some scraps, we the people do not need them…we have memories of their,, lies and half truths …editing Killary’s lies,it has been a gut wrenching election..full,of frustration.and anger. What a celebration party we are going to have..getting rid of our Racist first family, and murderous exhead of state . Almost Time to smell the roses, get rid of Obama and Killary stench…yay

  8. This birther stuff is a distraction….not important at this stage of the game….was started by someone on the Clinton staff….most important is who is physically fit to be our next commander….we don’t need someone that passes out, lies and is only out for their own power, money, & control over us

    • Of course it’s important!! We have a usurper squatting in the Oval Office and we should NEVER allow that to happen again!

      • Was always more interested in something I learned in either civics class or POD class (Problems of Democracy than birther stuff)…..the parents of a candidate running for the U.S. presidency had to be natural born citizens of the U.S. …..it was something I remember learning or being talked about 40 some years ago in high school…..at least that is the way I remember it.

  9. Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii, but Mombasso Kenya. How do I know that? I read an article the Fall of 2007 from a prestigious Magazine describing the possibility of a new Black candidate for our Presidency! Yes, you would have picked up that mag and read every word like I did.

    The author of the article went to Mombasso and interviewed the midwife who helped deliver bho and bho’s own grandmother abt the possibility of him being the U.S. president. The author also interviewed the Chief of the Village of Mombasso and his advisors – all smiling ear to ear and so very proud their brother might be the U.S. president. It was a joyous occasion and these people were ecstatic! Yes, there were pics of everyone except the midwife who did not want to be photographed.

    So imagine me sitting in that doctor’s office just having read that a MAN BORN IN MOMBASSO KENYA WAS GOING TO RUN FOR OUR PRESIDENCY! I was shocked!! Having been a teacher, I knew the qualifications to be President was THE CANDIDATE MUST BE A U.S. CITIZEN…PERIOD. So how could this obama man ever be president?? We know how this all happened – corruption raised its ugly head, Soros stepped in and “HID” all bho’s docs so no one could prove otherwise. Then the lies began!!

    First bho needed a wife and family to make him look like the all American candidate…so people to make him look acceptable were found. TMI here, but those girls aren’t his and there is no “love” attachment between Michelle and him…just an arrangement. (Anyone in a marriage relationship is affectionate once in a while – no “real” affection was ever publically exchanged between M & B – all our other Presidents kissed their wives at the Podium and other public events – NEVER bho!)
    Then the Law Degrees were created along with the Docs from Columbia University (where absolutely NO ONE REMEMBERS ANYONE LOOKING LIKE BARRACK IN THEIR CLASSES NOR EVEN ON CAMPUS). The supposed Law Degree from Harvard has the same reactions – no one remembers a barrack anywhere on Campus. – and at Harvard, they would know everyone else because there is a high degree of competition in those halls! Another fraudulent action to make bho acceptable.
    I could go on and on because I did the detailed lengthy research once I read that article. Why would any writer go to the extent of creating pics and dialogs of people across the world — unless it was true and he was trying to inform Americans that there was something fishy abt this Black man’s appearance? That article was to wake Americans up and it woke me up BIG TIME!
    I’ve tried to find that Magazine since then but you can’t find any magazine with that article like they were mysteriously removed from the shelves, libraries, and archives. Soros is thorough and I’m sure he bought up every copy he could get to make that truthful info disappear.

    TRUMP may have conceded the birther issue right now, but he did so with his fingers crossed behind his back. He hates what bho has done to our Country and mark my words, once in office will use all the facilities available to find the truth about the imposter darkening our White House walls. Bho will be “toast”!

    • Tom Fife has a statement on the internet about meeting a Russian woman in the early 1990’s and that woman told him then that a black man was going to be a president of the United States.

      Since then I have read that Arab nations subsidized his education. Also. .. the clerk in Hawaii did not ever see his birth certificate. He has testified to this fact.

      This Obama critter is a plant by someone, some entity, some country, set to
      bring about the decline and fall of America.

      He is doing this as fast as he can, w/o being arrested, shot, or deathly ill.

      His days, like Satan’s, are numbered. What can he do with his next
      100 or less days? Think on it.

      No one to arrest him, because the Army Provost Marshall is in hiding, somewhere,

      whoever he is. No one in the military to gather forces and storm the

      Bastille.

      No one in Congress to utter a peep, because they were complicit in his

      attaining office as the sitting president, knowing full well that he is an impostor.

      How corrupt can a country get? Look at this country.

      One good thing came out of this farce… we know now how deeply in merde

      this country is and was, all along, and we never knew it.

      These evil individuals did not just suddenly become born and voted into

      office. They were there all the time… behind closed doors .. doing their

      dirty deeds against America.

      The count is long… Pelosi, Reid, Lynch, Kerry, Boehner, SCOTUS,

      and so on and so on. It must come to hundreds of corrupt officials

      who have been undermining this country for years and it took

      the appearance of a monkey man, one who hates this country

      and white people, (saw a video listed in which he rants on his hatred)

      and this monkey/mongrel has taken over our government, our

      military and our justice department, w/o a shot being fired.

      He has done this w/o any combativeness from any organization.

      He has done all of his nefarious deeds w/o any opposition from

      those in authority.

      Where is the Army Provost Marshall? In fact, who is he?

      Where is the sheriff who could take him out of the White House?

      Where is the military who is sworn to defend this country from

      domestic enemies?

      Where is the one who can eliminate this cancer from our country?

      .

  10. Trump reminds me a lot of Teddy Roosevelt. he was a maverick that they could not control. they thought they put him on ice when he was elected as V.P. when McKinley was re-elected POTUS in 1900. normally the V.P. slot is a dead end and a political death sentence. the only thing they didn’t foresee was McKinley being assassinated in 1901. T.R. became President and history was made. he served two terms.

  11. The reason that the Founding Fathers followed Vattel’s “Laws of Nations” in which it stated that both parents must be (US) citizens at the time of birth of said candidate was because they wanted to eliminate the possibility of mixed allegiances to a foreign government. Obama’s father was never a US citizen. Hence, Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.

  12. Obama admitted himself when he applied to college as a foreign born citizen. All his records were sealed and everything else about him. I laugh when people chastise Trump when Hillary and her supporters are the real dolts

  13. If Obama was born on U.S. soil the documentary proof would have been easy to obtain and he would have produced it as soon as Hillary’s campaign raised the issue. The fact that he did not do so and that the documents he did finally produce were provably “doctored” pretty much says it all. Both the Democrats and Obama’s liberal Republican enablers who control congress and have only allowed token resistance to his agenda will attack, vilify and marginalize anyone who now raises the issue. They must because Obama’s agenda to disarm us, erase our borders, socialize and/or nationalize our economy, grow government and centralize political control while undermining our Constitution and forcing us into a socialist global world order as envisioned by the “puppet master” George Soros, is also their agenda. If they allow it to be proven that Obama was never a legitimate president then everything he has done to further the agenda becomes invalid. That simply cannot be allowed to happen. In order to suppress the facts they are being forced to suppress the fact finders. Trump’s no dummy and I’m sure he knows all of this but by saying what he just said he leaves the Hillary camp and their media lapdogs with no issue to pursue, forcing them to sit down and shut up about it. I’m beginning to believe that Trump is going to win this thing. It also appears that both parties are beginning to implode as more and more people are waking up to the fact that neither major party truly represents their values or interests. The old “are you a democrat or republican” paradigm is dying. I see that as a good thing since both parties have contributed to the corruption that now pervades our federal government. If the sleeping giant is in fact beginning to awaken we may yet preserve the republic and save our nation by calling an article V convention of states to restructure a new government and restore the legitimacy this one has lost. The only alternative is to collapse and descend into anarchy and chaos. That has already begun, but it’s not too late. It can be reversed.

      • Colbert is not a serious political analyst or commentator and while he is entitled to have is opinions and project his brand of humor he cannot be given credence as an authoritative source of information. I would equate him more to a foul mouth jester perhaps the liberal counterpart of “Larry the Cable Guy”. I happen to like political humor and satire as long as it is not biased and lampoons all parties and public figures. Colbert is not in that category. He was somewhat correct on one point. Hillary herself did not raise the birth issue. That was done by her campaign surrogates to provide her with a buffer against it being directly attributable to her…typical of everything else she does.

  14. Barack Hussein Obama is Commander-in-Chief of the peasant’s brigade? This Pretender-President Obama, falsely inaugurated, and now using a fake long-form birth certificate—illegally put together April 27, 2011, in a Honolulu Kinko’s shop by Hawaiian Governor Abercrombie and his political crew—a 2-day work session in Kinkos, paid for with a government credit card—as later described in some detail by the shop manager.
    Exhibit #1, in my possession, is an internet entry (5/13/2010) of a Certified Copy of a Kenyan Registration of Birth, numbered #495, for Barack Hussein Obama, dated 4 August, 1961, Coast General Hospital, Mombasa, Coast Province, Kenya. [Kenya, East African colony, gained independence from Britain Dec. 1963.]
    This Kenyan birth certificate lists Father as B.H. Obama, & Mother as Stanley Ann Obama, age 18, former name Dunham of Wichita, Kansas, USA. So we have two opposing birth certificates, only one of which is authentic, and the other fraudulent. Barry is born again?—soon to be paid a life pension, occupying a false throne as virtual “emperor-emeritus”—with final blessing of George Soros, a real power behind the throne of the New Order?

  15. Still…it shows the world that Trump capitulated to the left. I believe Obama is a US Citizen, as much as I believe Marilyn Monroe was a man!

  16. Hey Jazzbelly is that all you have to say you leftist idiot? How’s that lobotomy working out for you?

  17. I never cared for Trump before he started running for president but I have to admit that he is one shrewd deal maker that tells it like it is and is not a politician, up till now, and that is exactly why “US” freedom loving Americans love him and the Communist Party USA, formerly the democ-rats are terrified of him as well they should be! Any sane, unbiased person with an ounce of common sense and half a brain knows that this NWO implanted puppet was not born in America and is Anti-American – end of story!

  18. “Trump puts last hopes about own decency to bed with one last shot” – ought to be a title of this article.

    In the dystopia “1984” the totalitarian state held a department busy in updating all historic records in order to keep them consistent with any new whim of the Big Brother. This despicable nation fell as low, that it does not even bother to “update” anything from the recent past.

    It became a new normal that the sheeple and its authors are not even expected to remember what took place recently, are incapable to add 2+2, so that no torture is even required for them to agree that 2+2=5.

    1) The 2008 Senate Resolution 511 on McCain happened to be a huge “blunder” because inadvertently it “leaked” the Law of Nation’s definition of the “Natural born” as born to citizen parents on the soil.

    Just as crook Cruz leaked it during his senatorial campaign.

    Just as the “first birther” Obama did in polemics with Dr. Keyes in 2006 on his own acknowledging of not being a natural born, but so what? For the senatorial campaign it was not required. Obama (whoever he really is) officially is NOT born to two citizen parents.

    However it is not even expected to remember that, nor to remember the paint art of the 2011 BC (a 3 dollar bill), nor the stolen SS#, nor the murder of Ms. Fuddy of Hawaii in 2013. Birtherism is an indecent joke, you know, a blatant racism.

    2) Now America has its own kind of shahada (islamic oath of faith), which is “pResident Obama was born in America indeed”. And the presidential hopeful willingly uttered this shahada, this deflecting obfuscating falsehood just in order to please his handlers. By doing so Trump humiliated himself and betrayed millions of people striving to the truth and believing in his integrity and decency. Yet all that is depicted as a wise move and the promise to make America better than it’s ever been before!

    This nation still exists only due to an inexplicable delay of God’s judgement.

    • Actually, God has chosen Mr. Trump to become president,
      to right the wrongs of this nation. He gave this Word of
      Knowledge in 2011 and it can be heard on TRUNEWS
      a video on the internet, with Rick Wiles as host
      interviewing, for the first time, the Christian,
      Mark Taylor, who rec’d this Word.

      Mr. Trump was chosen by God; he was not called
      through his own desire.
      .
      He is anointed and protected and is a man of his word,
      not intimidated, and has the enemy shaking and quaking,
      and wondering what to do to be rid of him.

      This was all given in April 2011. And now it is
      coming to pass.

      • So far Trump behaves not as though chosen by God. What is coming to pass does not look as righting the wrongs of this nation.

        • You have to give him time.. he is not in office, yet. He is doing what he can, he is promising what he will do, and his word is law.
          Mr. Trump is the last Trump.. .. if he is chosen by
          God, as the Word was given to Mr. Taylor, then he will do what
          God has ordered him to do. Those were the words of God..’right the wrongs of this nation”
          If Mr. Trump is a disappointment to you, that is very sad, but you need to have patience. I only worry that the abomination of Obama will undertake so many dreadful things against this country before Mr. Trump can be in office, that we will be in chaos for months. I just pray that God will do with Obama what he is doing to Hillary Clinton. God said he would remove the oppressors (in the prophecy).
          Well, God, let me tell you, Obama is the head of the Evil that men do, and his removal would be a huge help.
          AIDS comes to mind.

  19. this pope needs to be throne out for selling out TO OBAMA AND BESIDES HE’S TO STUPID TO MAKE ANY KIND OF STATEMENTS

  20. Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !os608f:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !os608f:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash908MediaDayGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!os608f:….,…..

  21. Born in US or not irrelevant. “Natural born citizen” by virtue of mother being American. All quite simply laid out by Immigration Law and requirements of citizen – just an idiotic beat-up! Very good deflection blaming Clinton which equally has zero substance.

    We don’t like the lies of the MSM but in the idiots answer to news it’s fine?

    • Nice try but no cigar. INS laws deal with immigration and naturalization, functions delegated to Congress, not with the Constitution. Those laws change on a regular basis with who is in power, the Constitution not so much. Emerich de Vatel defines the term ‘a person born on the soil and of citizen parents’ (plural). There is solid evidence to know that the framers were knowledgeable of, were trained with and used THE LAW OF NATIONS in which that definition is found. Now if you can show us a credible source for your definition of the term (NOT ‘natural born subject’), we’ll be all ears.

      • Yes cigar. The Constitution says “natural born citizen” – law defines what that is. Citizen by birth, wherever born because of mummy. that’s why I have two passports as does my wife – duh! Citizen/subject – same difference, just depends were you are in the world. US – citizen. UK – subject of her Majesty.

        Romeo y Julieta No2. please!

        • What law? You say there is a law, show me the law that defines that term. I call bullshit.

          Citizen/subject is NOT the same thing. Get a clue. Do you even know what subject means? sheesh.

          Anybody can hold multiple citizenships and get multiple passport – unfortunately. What has that got to do with ‘natural born citizen’? nothing.

          Citizen and natural born citizen do not equate.

          Show me the law (and it is NOT valid unless it specifies ‘natural born citizen’).

          • Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795 will sort you out.

            You only qualify for a passport if you are a citizen of a country whether by birth, adoption or naturalization. You only qualify for “natural” dual at birth, later would require a naturalization process.

            Citizen/subject – am I right or wrong about my example? Subject of her Majesty in UK. You could always Google “British Subject”

          • False. The NA of 1795 corrected the error that caused confusion in the NA of 1790. Read the record. That was the whole purpose of doing a revision so soon.

            Remember, Congress cannot change the definition of a term in the Constitution. It had a definition when it was drafted and that is the ONLY definition of that term. Sometimes that definition has to be sought out and that is the job of the SCOTUS – not Congress.

            Any citizen, natural, born, naturalized or native can get a passport. Note FOUR different types of citizens – ALL different but all citizens.

            You’re ‘example’ – isn’t. Two different animals.

          • A natural born citizen is a native – one thing!
            Naturalised – different.
            That’s it!

            “It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term.” Obviously reading all of it is helpful!

          • Been at this for almost 10 years, got the T, there’s nothing new you can show me – and you certainly haven’t yet. I ask you for a definition and you keep going off on tangents. |Just a simple definition please. You’re so certain, surely you have that at your fingertips and you’re just teasing me?

            Would it surprise you to know that ‘shall be considered as’ and ‘are the same’ are two different legal terms that do NOT mean the same thing? But you knew that, you were just testing me – naughty boy.

          • Petty to say the least. The quote was from the Act. I don’t really care what the result is, facts is facts. “Natural born citizen”. And your second paragraph merely points out what a pathetic bigot you are. Suspect they are “citizens” subject to the parent(s) being a foreign operative or criminal. Get a life!

            Am sure I am considerably more magnanimous when in-correct, but as I am married with daughters I have a lot of experience. No test – you are just pathetic!

          • “And your second paragraph merely points out what a pathetic bigot you
            are. Suspect they are “citizens” subject to the parent(s) being a
            foreign operative or criminal.”

            That’s exactly the purpose of the phrase, idiot, to prevent foreign influence on the POTUS – like Obama.

          • Yes, am sure Kenya and Indonesia really benefited. Really! Ha, ha, ha!

            Influence on the President – who is a figure-head and pen-pusher. Influence would be greater if you owned the Speaker of the House or the Head of the CIA. Get a life! Administrator!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • What! Given up? I think that’s a “Sorry, Mr Poohey – you are correct!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*