Theresa May Thinks Internet Restrictions Will Prevent Islamic Terror

We applaud some of what British Prime Minister Theresa May had to say after Saturday’s terror attack in London – she put the blame where it lies and said there was a bit too much tolerance in the UK for Islamic extremism. In a country where some 20,000 jihadists are said to live and plot, that’s probably an understatement, but hey, it’s a start. Certainly, she’s a step ahead of London’s Muslim mayor, who is one of those fools who thinks Islam has nothing to do with what’s going on.

But rather than crack down on the number of Muslim immigrants who are allowed into England or start putting well-known radical mosques under surveillance, May thinks the way to prevent Islamic terrorism lies in putting restrictions on what people can say on the internet.

“We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements to regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning,” May said Sunday.

This is one of those proposals that sounds good when you’re in the heat of the moment and you’re thinking about ISIS-supporting Twitter accounts and secretive websites deep the back corners of Web where terrorists plan attacks on innocent Londoners. It’s not so good, however, when you listen to May prattle on about the “pluralistic values of Britain” and realize that her idea of an internet speech crackdown would probably target anti-Islamic sentiment just as much – or more than – pro-ISIS chatter.

After all, we’ve seen in Germany how quickly Europeans are to give up their free speech rights in the name of protecting so-called marginalized groups. And Britain itself has a shaky history of arresting and prosecuting citizens accused of “Islamophobia.”

When it comes to European leaders, we’ll take May over Merkel or Macron any day of the week, but she would do well to edge a little closer to Donald Trump’s way of seeing Islamic terror and a little further away from her continental allies. Western Europe has already done irreparable damage to its own citizens with a thoughtless agenda of multiculturalism that has allowed thousands and thousands of Middle Easterners to set up camp in their cities without even making a polite attempt at assimilation. Worse, many of these Arabs are demanding that their hosts change THEIR culture and THEIR laws to make them feel more welcome.

This disaster-in-progress has led to a dramatic uptick in terror and crime, which has inevitably led to a backlash. Now these leaders, unwilling to just stand up and admit that they were wrong, want to make it illegal to speak the truth about their failed agenda…and about the unwanted Islamists living among them.

About Admin


  1. If they are aware that there are 20,000 + Jihadists in country then maybe they ought to consider rounding them up end deporting them. Are they afraid that they might offend them?

  2. Kill them all. Opps! forgot this is a country on HIGH TERROR alert and still have unarmed patrolman walking the beat.

  3. Yes, Ms May. Putting restrictions on the internet will prevent Islamic terror just like closing your doors and windows will keep out ants, spiders, cockroaches and rodents.

    • Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj297:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash297HomeAppGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj297..,.

      • Pickling flypoop out of pepper wearing boxing gloves is not my idea of a job. But thanks anyway.

        • LMAO!!! Great response!!!!!

        • ExpatriateSoon

          Just block them let them talk to themselves. That way you don’t waste time and they are screwed there will be another and another 2 clicks and they are gone

          • That is exactly what we should do – block them! However, I don’t want those Libs to stop posting! Think of how many Conservative Democrats are noticing the foolish antics of the far left Democrats! The Sane, Patriotic People that are middle of the road Democrats are awakening also.
            But there is no hope for the corrupt politicians for they won’t give up their ill-gotten gains. We must just vote those out of office.

          • Trollls and spammers get the same treatment. I don’t block someone who has a reasonable disagreement or someone who is just plain dumb.

          • I don’t intentionally block a poster that has a reasonable disagreement either. However, I can’t seem to differentiate between the far left and plain dumb!

          • If they sound like Maxine Waters far left, I Don’t understand is plain dumb lol

          • Sometimes I suspect that “far left” and “plain dumb” are synonymous terms! LOL

          • True

          • Ya might want to consider the fact – these people get PAID to surf and troll…..

          • Thats exactly why they do it so if they get blocked they don’y get paid.

    • WELL SAID!!!

    • The only way Britain and the rest of Europe is going to end this scourge is to evict all people of mid-east origin. I know that is not politically correct and even harsh, but there is no other way. I’m sorry for the peacefull Mooseslimes ( if there is such a thing) But how else can you ensure no other attacks will occur? In a big way, this is Britain and France’s own fault. All of these Arab countries were their colonies at one time. They opened the door. Germany is simply trying to atone for WWII, though they owe no more apologies, certainly not to the Mooseslimes. In fact, you would think the ragheads love the Krauts.

      • Ignorant. Supremely fucking ignorant.

      • sandraleesmith46

        They were allies during WW II; both anti-Jews, so yes, there is a kinship there.

      • The United States should deport ALL muslims immediately then destroy their mosques. We must save ourselves first.

        • Stephaniewyamashita

          *EXCLUSIVE OFFER BY GOOGLE*… !ym381c:
          +$97/hr pay by google, I am making a good salary from home $7500-$9000/WEEK , which is amazing, one year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy, I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everyone,Here is I started,,,
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleMoneyTree381ImageSimple$97hourly/Careers ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!ym381c:….

        • Agreed. Here’s why: (2635) They Have A Plan…be afraid…be very afraid! – YouTube

          It’s only a little over a minute and MUST be watched by all of us.

          • I viewed that! Wow. And this woman is representative of our “peaceful Muslims”! Even when the truth is shown, people prefer to stay blind to the threat. Have you read about Hamtramck, MI? This town shows that the Muslim takeover is already happening!
            Thank you for that link.

          • I’ve got news for this broad, its not going to happen, there are too many of us that will not allow it to happen.

        • IF THE USA had informed leaders as Japan does then, like Japan, NO Muslims would be allowed citizenship or the owning of any property within our country to construct mosques!

      • Excellent idia ya nailed it !

      • I don’t think Germany or anyone else is trying to atone. This is a globalist/NWO ploy. When they are attacked its of their own doing by allowing all these people in without vetting them. They’re getting what they asked for. Thank God for Trump who is trying his best to keep this from happening in the U.S.. These people will never assimilate into our societies, but the governments are trying to make us assimilate into the Islamic society. Quit trying governments not going to happen, I’ll go down fighting if need be.

        • SO SAD there are so MANY anti-Americans that are anti-Trump who are working hard to sink the very boat THEY are floating in!!!!!


  4. That’s the way idiots from Europe reason with the world. It wasn’t the terrorist who killed that cop in London, it was the terrorists knife who killed him!

  5. She’s more deranged than the attackers were. She can still find ways to rationalize the mentality of those savage animals and sadly, the voters follow that stupid P0S right off the cliff. It’s so sad that they have now been conditioned to accept the fact that a few attacks here and there are just business as usual these days. France is next for having elected another loon to lead them. There are great reasons you don’t hear of these attacks taking place in Japan, they don’t put up with ANY of this pathetic PS.

  6. Theresa May, MAY NOT mess with our internet! Keep your grubby overreaching gov’t hands out of our private lives, you control freak whore! If you had not allowed the muslim barbarians into your stupid country in the first place, like Poland did, you wouldn’t have the carnage you’ve been experiencing & will continue to experience, dummy. Until you do what Poland did, STFU, you Lib HAG!!

  7. Stupid broad!!… bullets stop terrorism. Might want to arm all your bobbies.

  8. ExpatriateSoon

    As sorry as I am for the people and their families they brought it on themselves. If you live in the US we have a larger problem. Our northern neighbor are following in the footsteps of France and we need to lock down our borders.

    • For those who might argue that Canada is our friend, I must remind you that it hasn’t always been that way! Don’t ever forget that many of our northern neighbors are the descendants of loyalists that we ran out of this country by our founding revolution! They are very much like us because they once were a part of us. They didn’t want our kind of freedom so they left this country for Canada. Their loyalty was to the king of England! They actually lived and fought here against the concept of freedom and liberty, and eventually, after fighting on the losing side, crossed into Canada and continued to be loyal subjects of the King. Canadians supported the efforts of England during the War of 1812, and the South, during the Civil War. Shortly after the American Civil War, the USA supported (by not attempting to stop) a short lived, unsuccessful invasion of Canada, by the Fenian Brotherhood. (The ultimate goal of the Fenian raids was to hold Canada hostage and therefore be in a position to blackmail the United Kingdom to give Ireland its independence.). No, the USA and Canada haven’t always been friendly to each other.

  9. At least May didn’t say what former Attorney General Loretta Lynch said which was, “all ISIS supporters need is Love”, as ISIS beheaded innocent victims including children!

    Thank God Obama, Holder and Lynch are gone and Hillary isn’t President. We’d be welcoming ISIS supporters into America by the thousands. Even now the Muslims already here, are pushing for Sharia Law in America.

    • Fucking liar. You post to mostly stupid asses here on the cuckservatard website. But I am calling you on your bullshit.

      • Bill, You are correct in that Lynch did not say the quote given.

        And the very lax vetting of the thousands of people from Syria, Somalia could have allowed numbers of terrorist to enter the country. No one can say with certainty if any entered or nor.

        • sandraleesmith46

          Actually she did say something very akin to that, if not those exact words. And any Muslim who reads and follows the Quran and Hadiths is a potential and probable terrorist, or his offspring are.

          • Yes Sandra, you are correct. She said “Our common humanity transcends our differences, and our most effective response to terror is compassion, it’s unity and it’s love”. This was from her presentation to the Florida gays after the Orlando nightclub killings.
            And you are correct in that any moslem has the potential to be a terrorist. Even though there are attacks like Timothy McVeigh, the majority of terrorist incidents around the world are committed by moslems. It is stupid to believe allowing any moslems into a country is a good idea. Their intent is to convert the world to islam or enslave or kill any who don’t convert.

          • sandraleesmith46

            Exactly! Of course there are rogues in any group of people, but the majority of violent attacks are coming from Muslims, especially when talking larger scale attacks. That’s just a fact, and as John Adams once said: “Facts are stubborn things”. Since Islam has shown no inclination in nearly 1400 years to moderate in the least, there’s no reason to suspect or expect that it will do so now.

          • It’s not only their intent, it’s their RELIGIOUS BELIEF !!!

          • Religion, cult or whatever it is, it presents a danger to the entire civilized world. Unless someone has spent time in the mid-East they will not believe how many of the people live and how hatred there is toward all western countries.

      • Unfortunately for YOU, Bill F., we “mostly stupid a*ses” are soon to have your ilk on the run. Hide and watch!!! LOL

        • No, you Trumpkin zombies will be mourning impeachment.

          • My, my Bill, you sound like you still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. It is truly amazing how you people can vent your hate against a man who is trying to protect the citizens of the United States while looking out for their wellbeing in the world economy. I would guess (?) also that you support the Paris Accord and good old Uncle Sugar picking up the Lion’s share of the NATO tab. After all, YOUR ‘hero’ put us in a 20 trillion dollar hole.

      • She told it honestly you stupid pile of shit. That scumbag Obama and his pals the Clintons would love to get every fucking raghead they can into this country.

    • sandraleesmith46

      We ARE! Or have you not noticed?

    • But they left their legacy. Watch this 1 minute video: (2635) They Have A Plan…be afraid…be very afraid! – YouTube

  10. Dang, I never dreamed that my HS education would one day raise me to the top of the “Most intelligent” people of the world, even above those from Harvard university.

  11. Yeah right…you always punish everyone, instead of just sending the jihadist’s and their breeding stock, back to sand land were they came from….that is BS. Just like when the islamist’s used airplanes on 9/11, so what does the government do…??? They sexually assault all airline passenger’s by grouping the hell out of them…and that while allowing the Islamist’s to breed & attack at will in America…just a bunch of PC crap.

  12. What we need is for Trump to stop recruiting terrorists. Not to mention he does their bidding spreading fear with his ignorant tweets. They don’t need to attack… Presidunce Fat Ass pushes the fear for ISIS all by himself.

  13. NEVER MIND internet restrictions; STOP importing ugly turd world garbage muslimes!!
    SEAL ALL BORDERS AGAINST ugly turd world garbage muslimes!! ERASE islime!!

    • What is your brilliant solution for terror by white Americans? Such as Sandy Hook, Columbine.

      • Typical liberal! Does not have a workable solution to offer, and instead, attempts to justify bad behavior by pointing out the bad behavior of others!

        • No, you Trumpkins dopes act as though banning Muslims solves everything. And for those who pay attention, it does not solve everything.

          • Up yours, name caller! Then what’s your answer to the problem?…………… That’s what I thought!

          • Repukes have bungled the middle east since Reagan. Now we have a mess from sticking our nose where it didn’t belong. But I can tell you banning almost 20% of the world’s people is not going to fix it.

          • You don’t have a clue, do you? Not even one good, or even bad answer to the problem? Of course not! BTW, since Reagan, government has been represented nearly equally by reps & dems, but you don’t like to admit that either, do you? Carter was a real prize; clinton was a mistake, and Obama was a traitor! All dems, as I recollect? I’m not sticking up for any of the Washington trash we have elected lately, as they are all cut from the same piece of moldy rotten cloth, bought and paid for by the NWO, one worlder, deep state, bankers, but this conversation started out being about the problems associated with illegals and Muslim presence, and you’d like to jump all over the place, spouting out the problems, but no proposed answers! That’s because your head is a repository for liberal, socialist lies and propaganda, and has very little room left for thought, from which answers are born!

          • I do not claim to have the answers. And you should realize you don’t either. And Trump sure the fuck doesn’t either. All he is doing is making things worse.

          • And all you’re doing is blowing smoke! You don’t want to hear anyone’s answers! if someone actually came up with an answer that worked, you’d have to think of something else to complain about, and God knows you’re incapable of thinking! I’m done with you! I gave you a chance to converse intelligently, but I should have known better! Go back to reading your comic books!

          • Eat my shit. You claim to know it all. I am not that full of myself, you douche.

          • Looks like i was wrong? Besides all that propaganda you’ve been eating, there was some room for a few words of profanity in your little pea brain, too! You keep up your support for all that free stuff you’re getting, from your liberal, socialist, scumbag political masters, because when the economy and the dollar collapses, the programs will stop, too, and the handouts won’t be there. You, and many of your liberal, socialist, democrat friends are going to have to make it on your own, and I don’t think you can do it! You’d have to be able to think, and we’ve already decided that issue!

          • Fuck you, racist shitstain.

          • You see race in everything don’t you? Too bad!
            Know any more big words?
            You might as well get them out of your system.

          • sandraleesmith46

            Then stop deflecting from the issue and labeling/name calling.

          • sandraleesmith46

            It may not solve everything; but it will VERY MUCH cut down on the problems.

          • As long as there are humans alive, we will never solve EVERYTHING! Even a putz knows that!
            But, we would certainly stop many serious problems by deporting all muslims NOW!

      • sandraleesmith46

        Those incidents are, by comparison, RARE: there will always be some deranged people who exist in every society; and there are signs, if they’re not ignored by PC bull crap, and fear of offending. Such persons could be dealt with; but we surely don’t need to import problems.

  14. Good, Ms. May. This way they can communicate through pigeons and I can get rid of the ones that are feasting everyday in my outdoor cat’s food. What a fool! Drinking too much tea, for sure.

  15. When Muslims start cooperating with law enforcement authorities and begin turning in the radicals who live among them, I will consider them as having been assimilated into our society. Until then, the “good” Muslims are no better than the jihadists, and I can see no difference between the two factions! Placing restrictions on the masses in hopes that the jihadist problem will fade away might slow down the process, but it won’t stop it. How many freedoms do we all have to lose before we fix the problem through implementation of hard line policies and rules that might seem harsh, but which do produce results? If a farmer finds a family of baby foxes whose mother was run over by an automobile, and out of pity, decides to house them with his chickens, very soon, he will have no chickens, only foxes! Wake up America, before it really is too late!

  16. Better ban cell phones too. They are often used as detonating devices.

  17. “God is not the author of confusion.” Politicians with a penchant for diversity are. Wouldn’t you think that in a country with a state church, this fundamental concept would have some representation in public policy. One wonders if the crown has revisited its perception of the source of divine right and can benefit from the schizophrenia of “Thou shalt have other gods before, or along side of God.” Perhaps, this is not a consideration. But, if it is, is it any wonder that the high price of royalty, unbuttressed by a consistency of attribution to the Source of divine right (not given to human divination) and exhibiting obedience to Him, has led to royalty’s diminished significance? This year marks twenty since the passing of Princess Diana and one can not help but
    speculate on cause and consequences and connections which have serious liabilities. What is needed is a consideration of “might,” not merely “may.”

  18. May must be replaced. Anything she says is to late for lovely Briton. You need a brawler, fighter a gunfighter for Briton and Brits.

  19. Beeotchstewie the deplorable

    Typical leftist response, nope, don’t go after the actual source of the violence, silence the truth. All that ends up doing is making the problems worse. You must identify and admit any problem before you can work on fixing it.

  20. Putting restrictions on the internet will prevent islamic terror like legal “life” sentences for murder will prevent the actual crimes! She might as well have said “We are now going to pass laws against islamic terrorism!” The stupidity of politicians exceeds all boundaries and limitations, it never ceases to amaze!

  21. The only solution for her, America and the rest of the civilized world, is to round up the Terrorists and Terrorists-in-Training and airdrop them back to the Sand Pile.

    When fighting an epidemic, distance is often the only solution that works.

  22. May must be the biggest idiot British Prime Minister since Neville Chamberlan. Churchill and Thatcher must be spinning in their graves.

  23. They are slowly moving to fascist/islamic control. They are taking this page from Iran/Saudi book of totalitarianism. In GB free speech is a fantasy and this move, if passed will seal the lid. If England does not wake up an vote all this fascist scum out they will be overthrown

  24. Pew polls reveal over half of Muslims believe the Quran word for word ( it instructs Muslims to kill all non Muslims) , you can’t change those stuck on Stupid! It’s the Insignificant numbers that has always caused the biggest problems ( Hitler with his Natzis, japans leadership dirring WW2 etc). These terrorist problems didn’t exist nearly as much until millions where allowed to immigrate into other countries ( fullfilling their commitment to divide and conquer from within). Now we have made it much easier for them to attach, kill, and rape from within. Exact same principles as the Trojan horse. The Leadership is our main problem.
    There is good reason these people where isolated for over 1400 years. BANN THE QURAN, Tear down their Mosques ( known planning Place for Gihad, and weopen storage), return anyone not willing to denounce sharia law and their ways/ beliefs. Allowing Muslims into positions of power will get us all killed. WAKE UP — this is no time to get stuck on Stupid!

    • Which is why all Mooseslimes should be exterminated. On the beach, at the airport, the train station, where ever they are found. It is us or them. Kill for your children and grandchildren. Kill them all.

      • JC
        I understand your feelings and it may come to that once countries are turned into another Beirut atmospheres with increased terrorism. Forcing our current leaders to denounce Muslim immigration, banning the Quran ( corrosive piece of trash), and implementing harsh punishment and swift deport actions is the only way to control
        That group.

    • Just in case you do not realize it… The Bible also instructs it’s subjects to kill others. Leviticus 13:20 for one verse.

      • BTW, that is the Old Testament. Where Mohammad got some of his apocalypse. The New Testament calls for loving God above all and love your neighbor as your self. Words from an Islamic prophet, Isa.

        • sandraleesmith46

          There is only 1 Word and it’s integral. There’s a profound difference between a just execution of a criminal, and the wanton murder of anyone. And loving your neighbor may mean stopping of sins to prevent further contamination by sinners.

      • sandraleesmith46

        Just in case you didn’t read far enough to understand, or want to, Yhwh God had already judged those peoples for their SINS, and sent His chosen people in to carry out JUST execution of His sentence on them; there is a vast difference. They weren’t sent to MURDER willy nilly; but specific persons/peoples, with cause were to be EXECUTED. Islam sends its followers to murder without cause.

  25. PM May is deluded. The reason The UK is experiencing radicalization is the number of refugees they allowed into the country. Kick out every refugee entering in the last 20 years and their families. Immediately remove citizenship rights to anyone traveling to a country experiencing radical Islamic violence. Promote gun ownership and remove punishment for anyone killing someone in the act of radical Islamic violence. Get rid of the London mayor. Clear out the no-go zones, sharia courts, men who marry children, and anyone preaching violence.

  26. James Higginbotham

    May is such a DELUSIONAL MORON and she thinks she is BRILLIANT.
    the British had better FIND ways to get FIREARMS and start using them on those MUSLIMS other wise their DONE AS A NATION.

  27. The song by the Kinks, “Living on a Thin Line”, keeps echoing in my head: “All the stories that have been told, of Kings and days of old, BUT THERE’S NO ENGLAND NOW…”

  28. Theresa, did you think to stop inviting Islam may make more sense than banning anything other than Islam?

  29. No one really has the right to be in our country, it is a privilege and if you break the law in our country your privilege time is over and they send you home. That is it. It is not an “on demand” right of people to be in our country. People seem to forget that we can close the gates at any time we please and not let a soul enter the country. If people are not vetted properly then that leaves them out of the country period. Our safety would be in jeopardy because of letting in people of questionable background.

  30. The only way to control the terrorists is to kick them out of the country. Restricting everyone’s use of the internet isn’t fair. Punish the criminals not the law abiding citizens.

  31. Herbert W. Love, Jr.

    She is is avoiding the most obvious cause of all, “radical” Islamic Muslims. Islam is the cause! It is because the verses & Muhammad’s instruction in (Quran & Sharia Law) promote a world dominance of the Islamic religion all over, “everywhere” on earth. Plus… instructions to go out and terrorize infidels anywhere you find them is also justified in Muhammad’s sick teachings of Islam.

    Islamic teachings do not respect any other religion. All other religions are insignificant to Islam and there is no understanding or education about other religious faiths. The call us all infidels if we do not follow Islam.

    The Islamic cause of terror is not rocket science. Muslims everywhere march to the same teachings, but it’s a well known fact that any Ayatollah, or Cleric can suddenly make them a radical, murdering killer of innocent human life without regard for little innocent children & women. Islam is like a disease on mankind.

  32. Vladimir Kunin

    Published: Wednesday, March 17, 2004
    Yashico Sagamory
    …. The Mythical Moderate Muslim. ———–
    The official, politically correct point of view says that Islam is just another monotheistic religion, not that different from Judaism or Christianity. If that is true, then moderate Muslims must exist, just like moderate members of other faiths. However, moderate members of other faiths do not require sacrificial mollification – that’s basically how we tell moderates from extremists. Therefore, either moderate Muslims are mythical creatures, or we need substantially different criteria to identify them. That dilemma alone should make us suspicious as to whether Islam is “just another religion”. Obviously, it is important that we determine how a moderate Muslim can be distinguished from a Muslim extremist.
    Why not ask Muslims themselves? Irshad Manji, a young Canadian author, has published a book titled “The Trouble With Islam.” Since we don’t hear too many Muslim voices criticizing their religion, her book deserves our attention. This is what the author herself says on her promotional website
    “I appreciate that every faith has its share of literalists. Christians have their Evangelicals. Jews have the ultra-Orthodox. For God’s sake, even Buddhists have fundamentalists. But what this book hammers home is that only in Islam the literalism is mainstream.”
    Apparently, the terms “literalism” and “fundamentalism” in the quotation above are used interchangeably, as synonyms of religious extremism. Unfortunately, the author fails to mention the most important difference between “literalists” in Islam and other religions. Evangelical Christians may believe that heaven is reserved for them alone. Ultra-Orthodox Jews may display intimate understanding of the murkiest places in the Talmud. I have no idea what extreme fundamentalist Buddhists do that sets them apart from their moderate coreligionists. What I do know however is that no religion except Islam pursues the idea of physical extermination of those who believe differently. The concept of holy war is unique to Islam. Jihad is the absolute monopoly of Muslims. There is no parallel to it in any other religion in the world (Yes, I have heard about Crusades, but Christianity does not mandate them, and do you know when the last Crusade ended?).
    So, here we have it in plain English, as simple as A, B, C:
    A. According to the Koran, holy war against the infidels is a sacred duty of every Muslim.
    B. According to Ms. Manji, mainstream Muslims interpret Koran literally.
    The conclusion is inevitable:
    C. Mainstream Muslims perceive war against the infidels – meaning you and me – as their sacred duty.
    Once you understand that, you don’t need books to explain to you what exactly the trouble with Islam is. The trouble with Islam derives from the fact that mainstream Islam openly calls for murder of all infidels. That’s why Islam is not “just another religion”. That’s what, in my view, allows to classify all its followers as extremist.

  33. Vladimir Kunin

    Religion of What?
    by Yashiko Sagamori
    Every culture has its own definition of peace. Muslims, for instance, divide the world into two zones: Dar el Islam, which translates as the domain of Islam and encompasses the parts of the world ruled by Muslims, and Dar el Harb, which translates as the domain of war and comprises the rest of the world. They equate peace with Islam while designating everything outside it for conquest and destruction. Of course, it would only be destruction from our point of view; from theirs it would be bringing us into Dar el-Islam, the domain of peace. Actually, it’s even better than that: they believe it would be bringing us back since the entire world belongs to their deity and every human being, beginning with Adam, comes into this world as a Muslim. As you can see, Muslims do not lie when they call their abominable superstition a religion of peace: according to their definition, it is. We find their definition unsuitable based on statistics rather than religious arguments. According to statistics, most Muslims who die a violent death are killed by other Muslims. I don’t want their kind of peace either.
    Peacemongers and Jihadeers, Part I by Yashiko Sagamori

    —–Original Message—–
    Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:40 AM
    Subject: peace
    Hello, I am Rosli from Malaysia and I am a Muslim. I had read what you had written in the webpage. I totally disagree the way you mention about us Muslim. I think that you did not understand the true meaning of jihad. The best thing to describe Islam is “Islam is all about peace”. The word Islam itself mean peace. I want to give you a suggestion if you want to know Islam better you must try to read the translation of the holy Quran and observe it or you can log on to website to upgrade your knowledge about Islam. Ok may Allah give you guidance.
    Dear Rosli,
    When someone wakes you up in the middle of the coldest, darkest night of the winter and complains how unbearable the heat of the sun has become, he is either calling you from halfway across the world or he is blind and sitting dangerously close to a blazing furnace.
    When someone tells you in the year 2006 that Islam is all about peace, he can be one of many things. He can be a Jewish liberal looking at the world and the approaching Holocaust through the pink glasses of political correctness. He can be someone as ignorant and unwilling to learn as President Bush. He can be an unapologetic liar like Condoleezza Rice. He can be a ridiculously apologetic coward like Tony Blair. He can be a schizophrenic, because schizophrenics live in an alternate reality. And, last but not least, he can be a Muslim, because Dar el-Islam is an alternate reality.
    If Islam is all about peace, then I would like you to explain to me why Sunni Iraqis and Shiite Iraqis, instead of uniting against American invaders, are murdering each other to the tune of several dozens a day.
    If Israel is truly oppressing the so-called “Palestinians”, why are they, instead of uniting against it, are killing each other at a steadily accelerating rate?
    Why did the war between Iran and Iraq in the 1980’s claimed more than a million lives without benefiting either side?
    Why has the war between Turkish Kurds and “real” Turks, both Muslim people, killed more than 30,000? How could Abdullah Ocalan, the Muslim leader of the Kurds, declare in 1992: “Even if 100,000 people die this year, our movement cannot be disrupted,” while knowing that every single one of that impressive number of people whose lives he so easily deemed expendable was a Muslim?
    How did the combined efforts of Islamic Salvation Army and Armed Islamic Group result in a civil war in Algeria that produced 150 to 200 thousand Muslim casualties between 1991 and 2002?
    And look at Mecca, the holiest place of Islam, during the hajj, the holiest event of a Muslim’s life. Here is a brief (and, by far, incomplete) chronology of Muslims’ peaceful piousness in the modern times:
    1979 November 21: On the first day of the 15th Islamic century, a group of 300 students from the Theological University of Medina take control over the Holy Mosque of Mecca. They keep control for two weeks, when 63 are captured alive and the mosque is recovered. All occupants are executed.
    1987 July 31: Riots by Iranian pilgrims. More than 400 people die.
    1989 July 9: Two bombs kill 1 person. Shiites of Kuwait are accused, and 16 are executed.
    1990 July 2: Stampede leads to 1402 people dead.
    1994: A stampede kills 400 people.
    1997 April 15: Fire kills 340 people.
    2004 February 1: Stampede kills 244 people.
    2006 January 13: More than 345 pilgrims die in a stampede near the Jamrat Complex in Mina.
    I hope you noticed that I only listed a few of the most notorious cases of Muslim violence against Muslims. Those are not isolated episodes. They are part of an ongoing process that has accompanied Islam throughout its entire history. In fact, the absolute majority of Muslims who die a violent death are not killed by “infidels”: they are slaughtered by other Muslims. Therefore, if your definition of peace has anything at all in common with mine, Islam, contrary to your opinion, is not about peace at all. If you disagree, I will be grateful if you share your definition of peace with me.
    Maybe it is about deep personal beliefs? Let’s see. Islam is the only religion in the modern world that accepts forced conversions. Just a few months ago, two Western journalists were abducted in Gaza and held for ransom — also a uniquely Islamic practice. While in captivity, they were given a simple choice: convert to Islam or die. They converted. Not a single person of any authority in the entire Dar el-Islam has objected against that rape. And why would they? For 14 centuries Mohammad’s followers have spread Islam by the sword. For 14 centuries that worked for them. Why stop now?
    I am no hero myself. I have to admit that if I were offered the same choice, I would, most probably, choose life and repeat the shahada after my tormentors. But how would those foreign sounds that are utterly meaningless to me, sounds that were forced out of me by the gun at my temple or a knife at my throat, change the way I feel towards Islam and everything it stands for? You can force someone to follow your rituals; you can even force someone to fight on your side. But can you force a person to believe or not to believe something? No more than you can force an Islamic country into democracy, even if the entire military might of the United States is at your disposal. No, dear Rosli, Islam has nothing to do with personal beliefs.
    Maybe, Islam is all about truth? I doubt that, too. You must know that Sharia expressly forbids non-Muslims to bear witness against Muslims. This means that your religious courts, and, therefore, your religion, are not interested in truth but in the Muslim domination over the “infidel”.
    Besides, the Koran itself contains, shall we say, inaccuracies. For example, in 2.135 we read:
    They say: “Become Jews or Christians if ye would be guided (To salvation).”
    In reality, unlike Christianity or Islam, Judaism does not declare salvation a monopoly of its followers. Jewish law explicitly states that a gentile will go to heaven if he or she abstains from committing the seven mortal sins; a Jew, in order to go to heaven, must follow 613 commandments, including the seven mandated for gentiles. That’s why, when a person approaches a rabbi asking for conversion, the rabbi’s duty is to explain to the petitioner that the conversion will endanger his chances for salvation. A person desiring to become a Jew must understand the responsibility and accept it willingly and knowingly. This alone, as you can see, makes a forced conversion to Judaism even theoretically impossible.
    Whether the quotation above was a deliberate lie or the result of ignorance of the man you mistook for a prophet, it certainly prevents me from accepting the idea of divine inspiration behind the text.
    Maybe, Islam is all about love? I don’t think so either, because Islam is the only religion in the world whose followers routinely practice “honor killings” of members of their own families. It is also the only religion in the world that does not promise family members a reunion in the afterlife. Instead, it guarantees good Muslim men a free brothel for all eternity. It does not spell out the reward for virtuous women, but does specify that dead Muslims will be segregated by gender in their X-rated heaven. Wouldn’t a loving husband prefer to spend eternity surrounded by his family rather than fornicating like a priapic rabbit? He would, unless, of course, the loving husband in question is Muslim.
    Maybe, Islam is about high moral standards? Not really. Even if you decide to disregard the overwhelming corruption reigning in all Islamic countries, without a single exception, as a perversion of the true faith, you must know that wine, sexual pleasures, and everything else Islam declares taboo in this life, is promised in abundance in the next one. But if something is evil here, on our sinful earth, it must be even more evil in the pristine purity of heaven. Therefore, the wrongness of the act is not the reason for the prohibitions. What is then? Here’s my guess. If you forever prevent perfectly normal people from having fun, from enjoying their lives, they will be easier to control, easier to turn into “martyrs”. As you must know, this works wonderfully well.
    You must also know that in Muslim countries mullahs run prostitution rings by officiating temporary “marriages” between their customers and the hookers in full compliance with Sharia. You must have heard about Ayatollah Khomeini’s fatwas detailing what a man should do to an infant he raped or to domestic animals subjected to a similar treatment.
    Besides, even Mohammad himself didn’t rely on the high moral standards of his followers. He is quoted as saying, “When a man and a woman are in the same room together, the third person in that room is the devil.” I do not guarantee the accuracy of the quote (to the best of my knowledge, it is not found in either the Koran or Hadith), but I do know that it reflects the customary Muslim attitude: a person who has an opportunity to do wrong is not expected to resist the temptation. Don’t you think that such an attitude alone makes the average Muslim enormously more immoral than the average Western teenager who manages to spend a day of fun at the beach surrounded by half (or, rather, nine-tenth) naked females without ever being tempted to rape anyone?
    Maybe Islam is about charity? No, because all your charities support terrorism. After the devastating tsunami of 2004, Dar el-Harb provided tens of times more aid to its mostly Muslim victims that Dar el-Islam did.
    What is Islam about then? What has Mohammad brought into the world that was unknown before he declared himself a prophet? Monotheism was discovered by the Jews millennia before Mohammad. Worshipping a mortal instead of God was practiced by Christians centuries before Mohammad succeeded in turning himself into a bloodthirsty deity. What else is there?
    Having read the Koran and the Hadith long before you suggested it to me, I must tell you that Muslim sacred texts are not the best way for an outsider to acquire a practical understanding of your religion. If I wanted to help you understand Nazism or Communism, I would never invite you to start with the Mein Kampf or, respectively, Das Kapital. Instead, I would ask you to look at the Nazi atrocities during World War II or at the Communist atrocities wherever Communists came to power. And if, having learned what Nazis and Communists do, you decided to learn how they justify their crimes, then reading their propaganda materials might help you. Otherwise, you don’t need to dive head first into the cesspool, no matter how curious you are about the taste of its contents.
    In order to understand Islam, one doesn’t need to read the Koran. One only needs to take a careful, unprejudiced look at life in Islamic countries. Or, even better, at the purest, least corrupted by Western influence implementation of Islam in modern times. I think you would agree with me that the Taliban regime in Afghanistan was exactly such an implementation of Islam. Would you like to live in Afghanistan under the Taliban? Would you like to deprive the women in your family of all opportunities to go to school, to pursue a career, to walk in the streets, to be able to see a doctor when they become ill? Would you enjoy attending public executions? Would you like to take part in the stoning of an adulteress? Would you like to be told what clothes to wear, what length beard? Would you like the government to deprive you of the last vestiges of your privacy by insinuating itself into every aspect of your personal life?
    As a Muslim, you probably would. But as a reasonable person you shouldn’t expect people from other cultures to wish that upon themselves.
    My own initial acquaintance with Islam began not with its literature, but with the experience of living in a Muslim country. I decided to read the Koran when I heard about the Islamic belief that God handed Moses not the Torah, but the Koran and that later the evil Jews maliciously rewrote the holy book. I began reading the Koran out of curiosity. I wanted to see the other vision of the Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. I was curious if Muslims had an analogue of the Psalms or the Song of Songs.
    A few years before that, I was going through a period of fascination with Russian history and politics. Russia is the biggest and, in terms of its natural resources, arguably the richest country in the world. I wanted to know how the Russians had managed to turn themselves into one of the most miserable nations on the planet. I turned to Lenin for answers. I was hoping to find in his writings a monumental vision of greatness and the clues of mistakes that had prevented that greatness from happening. Instead, I found volumes of bickering with ideological opponents, minutiae of arguments that had ended decades before I was born and could interest nobody today.
    My experience with the Koran was similar to that. Instead of a different vision of the world I found fuming anger against Jews and Christians and shallow syllogisms intending to prove that the Forefathers of the Jewish people were Muslims rather than Jews. Allah in that book sounded like an insecure chieftain desperately trying to solidify his power over people who were uncertain as to whether they should submit to his will — which is exactly the situation Mohammad was in when he undertok the project of writing the Koran. The book is full of promises to his followers and threats to the rest of the human race.
    And here is the most important detail that sets the Koran aside from the Torah and the New Testament. Just as the Koran never mentions Jerusalem, it doesn’t contain a single reference to the Ten Commandments. All religions I am familiar with define good and evil in terms of how the believer is expected to relate to other people, whether or not they belong to the same religion. For Jews and Christians, the Ten Commandments provide the most fundamental guidance in distinguishing between good and evil. What about the Muslims? Their only measure of good is the loyalty to their prophet.
    Koran 3.110 states:
    Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in Allah.
    Since the right conduct is a lie and forbidding indecency is pure hypocrisy, what is left? What exactly makes you “the best community that hath been raised up for mankind”? Has there ever been a Muslim Newton? Or a Muslim Shakespeare? Or a Muslim Mozart? Or a Muslim Mother Teresa? A few Muslim names that you can name, like al-Khwarizmi, could shine only in the darkness of the Dark Ages. As soon as Dar el-Harb moved forward, Dar el-Islam found itself unable to produce even a single person of any global significance, except for an enormous variety of Kaddafi’s, Saddams, bin Ladens, Arafats, and other Hitlers of every imaginable magnitude.
    One of the most respected Muslim leaders of modern times, the former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad of Malaysia, made a remarkable admission in his farewell speech:
    We need guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships for our defense. But because we are discouraged from learning of science and mathematics as giving us no merit for the afterlife, today we have no capacity to produce our own weapons for our defense. We have to buy our weapons from our detractors and enemies.
    It is remarkable because it makes clear that one of the most respected Muslim leaders has no clue what motivates the people of Dar el-Harb. He would never believe that our apocalyptic (and, due to the cowardice of our leaders, absolutely useless) military might is nothing but a side effect of our insatiable curiosity about God’s creation. He also inadvertently admitted that his religion is nothing but a cult of death. And this is why I keep urging everybody who will listen to read the Koran and the Hadith, so they can see for themselves that Islam is not “just another religion” but an ideology of jihad, and jihad is not an internal strife of a Muslim for spiritual perfection, but genocide that’s been going on for 14 centuries in the name of a false prophet.
    And, by the way, the Arabic world Islam does not mean peace; it means submission. Can you tell the difference between the two?
    Having said this all, I must add that I understand that your letter was sincere and inspired by good motives. Let me respond with a sincere suggestion. Try reading the Torah. Don’t be afraid; it won’t make you a Jew, just as listening to Bach won’t make you a composer. But it might provide you with something you so desperately need: an alternative view of the universe. May you find good guidance wherever you seek it,
    Yashiko Sagamori

  34. I at first thought this statement came from Pelosi. That is how stupid it is. These vermin are out to conquer the world. The internet has nothing to do with the over a hundred passages in the worthless piece of crap called the Qu’ran, or however the scum cult wishes to spell it, that calls for the elimination of all who are not or will not become a member of the cult and worship a pagan so called God. Do not appease as Chamberlain did prior to WWII. Guess that is the Brit mantra. Appease,do not confront reality. Bottom Line: Just kill the scum where ever they appear.

  35. With all due respect Theresa May, Deportation of your Muslims would work much better.

  36. sandraleesmith46

    To the extent that there are Islamic sites that do preach/teach the violent fundamental aspects heavily and, worse, serve as gathering/strategic planning sites for violence, yes, she is correct; however, as pointed out here, it would all too easily fall into restricting so-called “islamophobic” speech faster than shutting down the dangerous sites these days, I expect. But something does need to be done about such sites. Most platforms claim to decry any speech that promotes violence or incites it; yet those somehow find places to run unimpeded. Why is that? Money? Globalist politics? Both?

  37. Malcolm Davidson

    Whatever happened to people being free to make up their own mind as to what is true, and or relevant? Why do we need the internet police? Much of what is posted on the internet, whether it comes from either the left or the right is absolute rubbish- so what? We should be able to decipher what is real and what isn’t. The reason we can’t is because we have been so dumbed down by our education bureaucracy. All we can do is scream at one another. I guess in the end we are cursed to be living in most interesting times.

    • sandraleesmith46

      It’s not just about deciding what is real or not; but about affording an easy platform for devising plans and strategies that bring harm to others. And that is a problem that needs to be addressed.

      • Malcolm Davidson

        I don’t dispute anything you are saying. I think what I worry about is the motives of May, Corbin, Obama, Trump, whomever, (pick your poison). I agree we have to do something, as I don’t think we need to just shut up and live with the fact that at any moment in time, some terrorist can decide to do his or her thing which results in a great deal of casualties. I think you rightfully are on to something- I guess as I get older I am less inclined to trust the powers that be.

        • sandraleesmith46

          I understand how you feel; I don’t trust them either; as I posted earlier, an internet restriction is far more likely to become against so-called “islamophobic” speech, these days, than against the ones who need to be stopped, if gov’ts get involved. And apparently the platform owners really don’t care who uses their platforms for what, despite their claims to the contrary; but that would be the logical place to start the blocking; “use my space to promote criminal activity, I shut you down”. Evidently the money is more important than lives and laws.

          • Malcolm Davidson

            I agree with you. Money, I think is more important than anything, especially to the Godless Globalists.

          • sandraleesmith46

            Money and power, not necessarily in that order, are their deities; and respect for law, pretty far down the list of priorities.

  38. MS May is a blind idiot.

  39. Soooo it was the internet that caused all the attacks in England – The open borders and political correctness had nothing to do with it? Muslim mayor who said they have to get used to attacks?


  41. Is this broad, May, freakin’ nuts!!! Maybe she wears a garlic cachet around her neck to ward off vampires too!
    The way to deal with terrorists is with automatic weapons of which the London police must have one or two laying around gathering dust!!!

  42. The only GOOD musdlim is a DEAD muslim. That is NOT meant to be a joke either.

  43. Briton We Have a Problem

    Three radical Islamists killed eight people and injured 48 more in London on Saturday night by ramming them with a van or stabbing them. These attackers were “known wolves,” according to multiple sources. British authorities knew they were dangerous. But as the New York Times reported earlier today, numerous warning signs were either PLAYED DOWN or IGNORED.

    One of the attackers, Khuram Butt, was featured on a Channel 4 documentary that tracked a group of Islamic extremists who supported the Islamic State. Butt, who was born in Pakistan, was filmed at London’s Regent’s Park while praying in front of a jihadist flag. According to a CNN report, Butt was “potentially one of the most dangerous extremists in the UK.”

    Rachid Redouane, the second killer, fought alongside Western-backed “rebels” in Libya during the revolution in 2011. Before that, he had been denied UK asylum. But because of his Irish citizenship, he was able to slip into the UK using his EU residency card.

    The third attacker, Youssef Zaghba, was an Italian citizen who twice attempted to join the Islamic State in Syria. Last year, at the Bologna airport, he proudly told Italian interrogators, “I am going to be a terrorist”! When he later moved to London, Italian authorities warned their British counterparts. But those warnings, like many others, were ignored.

    Britain has a MAJOR problem with radical Islam—both imported and homegrown. Five were killed in the Westminster Bridge attack in March, 22 in the Manchester bombing two weeks ago, and now eight more are dead from Saturday’s ramming and stabbing attack.

    These are not isolated events! Britain is under attack. As the late Margaret Thatcher stated in the days that followed 9/11, “We have harbored those who hated us, tolerated those who threatened us, and indulged those who weakened us.”

    Today, British security services tell us there are 23,000 subjects of interest walking the streets of Britain. It has been estimated that 850 British CITIZENS have left the country to join the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq, and about 400 of them have returned to Britain—most of them in and around London.

    Yesterday on Good Morning Britain, London Mayor Sadiq Khan, a Muslim, was questioned about the whereabouts of 200 to 400 Islamic State fighters now living around London. His terse response: “I can’t follow 400 people.” The mayor of London can’t be bothered with what dangerous extremists might be up to in his city! This man has also said he believes terrorist atrocities are “part and parcel” of living in big cities.

    So let the terrorists in, give them plenty of space to operate, and then when people are murdered, say, Hey, that’s life in the big city.

    As outrageous as the London mayor’s attitude is, many of us have fallen into the trap of thinking that this is just the “new normal”: A few innocent people are just going to get killed every now and then. Wake up! If pedestrians getting run over in the streets and children getting bombed will not wake us to reality, what will it take?

    The Prophet Hosea depicts biblical Ephraim, modern-day Britain, as a “cake not turned” (Hosea 7:8). It looks good on the surface, but underneath it’s all burned out! There is just no substance.

    Notice verse 9: “Strangers have devoured his strength, and HE KNOWETH IT NOT: yea, gray hairs are here and there upon him, yet he knoweth it not.” God says we are being devoured and we don’t even know it!

  44. 1PierreMontagne1

    Theresa may AKA “Never Thatcher” already thinks that curtailing free speech in England will suppress Islamic Terrorism
    So why not suppress free speech in any other arena where free speech triumphs over Islam and it’s a murderous zealots.
    2 Questions:
    Q1: “Why is it that only practitioners of Islam are being guaranteed free speech against non-Muslims, Christians d Jews and any other non-Muslim religion”
    Q2: “Why do western governments target the victims of Islamist attacks on western Society by taking away free speech if the victims challenge or protest Koran inspired attacks?

  45. That damned silly cow needs to understand that ‘internet’ is not universally available wheee ISIS originates, yet it thrived there. Ah how does she think that restricting internet will help? Any attempt would be painted as an attempt to destroy Islamic ‘culture’, and she’ll be labeled as a racist, too.

  46. Theresa May is out of her ever-lovin’ MIND…

  47. The only reason they want to control the internet is so they can control us with their propaganda.They want civil unrest,why do you think they’re spreading these Muslims all over the world

  48. IMO the UK is getting a dose of Islamic terrorism. Although I don’t want to see that happen, they asked for some of it by voting in a Muslim mayor. WTH did they expect? Its like the old saying don’t wait until the horse gets out before closing the barn door.

  49. IMO the only thing that will prevent Islamic Terrorism is to kill the terrorists. They are not our friends, and that will never change no matter how much liberals say love will change them. Are they for real?

  50. May is the same as Merkel or Macron as far as I can see. She just tries to hide it. The free flow of information on the internet is crucial in the fight for freedom. I think regulating cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning,” would block May and Merkle from making internet speeches.

  51. You are a fool. That’s like shutting the barn door after the horse got out. The internet has very little to do with the Islamic terrorism. That is governed by people pure and simple. If you have a terrorist in your midst be sure he will try to KILL YOU. You sound like an ostrich to me: bury your head in the sand and hope it goes away. If you continue to allow those fools in your country, just like America, I have no pity for you. The terrorist way is to kill any way possible and if you believe anything else go back to my first comment.

  52. 1PierreMontagne1

    Restrict mankind’s use of the internet and it will “Prevent Islamic Terror” oh yes I mist have forgotten the last beheading was caused by an IP address…and then there was that suicide bomber who detonated himself onlyh to be on Facebook, and hey what about the public executions in Iraq stopped by snipers when it could just as easily have been stopped by limiting ISIS access to network servers…
    Wow Theresa may is brilliant why had “others” not realized it was just that simple…oh I forgot “others” were dealing with the reality called Islam.

  53. NO WONDER you nearly lost and have lost a great deal of support —— but – it is hard to drum up support when the opposition keeps offering freebies for votes…….A man named Murphy was an intel guy – Left with over 49 disc’s of 411 – They reveal the domestic spying of americans and the over 600 million docs generated —– UNDER Mueller and Comey…..

  54. This tells me that she deliberately failed to prevent islamic terrorism for the deliberate reason of restricting the internet in the first place.

  55. (2635) They Have A Plan…be afraid…be very afraid! – YouTube

  56. Britain, you not only let terrorists into your country, you insisted they be allowed to come. You are reaping what you have sown and you deserve it.

  57. Does this surprise anyone? She is another Obama, he wants the same thing, they’re called Globalists or NWO. They want to stop us from being able to communicate what’s going on in the world.

  58. Get straight to the root of the problem and it’s not the internet. We know which countries produce terrorists, put the blame where it belongs. Being politically correct is killing innocent people world wide. TRUMP has the real solution and the democrats here and ALL the liberal minded leaders in the rest of the world won’t do what is necessary to skeep their citizens safe.

  59. Thats alriight, we have Maria Haff (sp) used used to work for Dept of State and her theory was give all Muslims jobs and they will stop planting bombs and blowing people up…LOL

  60. Americans, Islam is trying to take over the world. Christians cannot let this happen. Hillary Clinton, she and Obama are in love with the Muslims and are crazy people that want to destroy America. Americans see what the Radical Islamic Terrorist are teaching in the Muslim Islamic Mosques, then they are sent to become radicalized and come back to kill Americans, Jews, Christians and non-Islamic folks. This tells the story and this is not a religion, instead it is a cult and taking over the world. Americans need to close all of the Mosques and deport all of the Muslims that practice the Sharia Law, get them out of America. Americans need to understand that Islam is not a peaceful religion and they are out to change Americas Constitution, laws, rules, regulations and try and take over the world. Obama and Hillary Clinton want to allow thousands more into the USA which will cause more of these barbaric savages in our country and more people killed. Read below what these animals believe, ideology and why they want to ill Americans and non-Islamic people.

    From the Qur’an:

    65:4 You can rape, marry divorce pre-pubescent girls.

    4:3, 4:24, 33:50, 79:29-30 You can enslave for sex and work.

    4:34 You can beat women.

    24:4 You will need 4 Muslim male witnesses to prove rape

    9:111 You will kill non-Muslims to receive 72 virgins in heaven

    2:217, 4:89 You will kill anyone who leaves Islam

    8:12, 47:4 You will behead non-Muslims

    9:5 You will kill and be killed for Allah (verse of the sword)

    8:12, 8:60 You will terrorize non-Muslims

    9:29 Kill Jews and Christians if they do not convert or pay Jizya tax

    chapter 8 (booty/spoils of war) Steal from non-Muslims

    8:12, 47:4 Crucify and amputate non-Muslims

    3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 40:28, 2:225 Lie to strengthen Islam (Taqiyya deception)

    9:111 Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth
    because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and
    shall slay and be slain.

    Islam = Terrorism?

  61. Wouldn’t it be better just to have a Task Force that monitors these people?

  62. May was a plant. She was against brexit.

  63. TYPICAL politician’s remedy for controlling the FEW by putting restrictions on the MANY!!!!!!

  64. May can think that, meanwhile vetting and travel bans will DO THAT! England is the easiest country to defend and May hasn’t the brains to do it. AND the Brits are paying the price for it with their LIVES! Is this what we want in the United States?

  65. In your dreams Theresa!

  66. Islamic Attacks predate the Internet there will be more Terror Attacks in London if they have to use two tin cans & string ! “In England start putting well-known radical mosques under surveillance” “No” “Start putting the Mosques under a Bulldozer” Until then stay off the Streets !!

  67. Hey, the same people who voted for that waco London mayor are some of the same ones who voted for May. Those idiots have forgotten history. If it were not for America they would be speaking German.

  68. Burn the Mosques, and Boot all Hadjiis The Hell OUT! That’s The Moslem Plan for Christians Jews and all other non Moslems! Do unto them,Before they Do unto Us!!

  69. Theresa May is a fascist who works for the Cabal and Global Elite just as does Obama and Hillary. She will parrot anything they want her to and retricting freedom of speech and the freedom of the Internet is just one more in a long list of things they have restricted and plan to. She also thinks that it is wrong to not let convicted Pedophiles to adopt. She says just because they were caught once, and paid the price, does not mean they will do it again.

    Who is she and how did she get into office in the first place? Probably the same way that many people do with a lot of campaign money and excellent spin doctors writing their campaign speeches. She is an ignorant troll. It just seem so ridiculous that we have to put up with so many of them!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *