Liberals Put Atheism Before Starving Children

In the United States of 2014, feelings matter more than facts. And since then liberal lawyers who make up the ACLU “feel” that promoting secular atheism is more important than seeing starving children get some much-needed food, it’s only natural that they would serve up a Christmastime warning to a middle school that dared to associate themselves with a charity called Friends and Family Community Connection San Diego.

But wait, say the two readers familiar with the charity, they are secular. You must have your facts mixed up! No, indeed, perceptive reader. See, the problem isn’t with the charity itself, it’s with a partnership they formed with an Illinois-based Christian charity called Kids Around the World. Friends and Family teamed up with both the local middle school and KATW to raise $3,500 to provide 14,000 meals for hungry children living in Tanzania.

Not on MY Watch!

Well, that was a bridge too far for the ACLU. They sent a warning letter to the middle school on November 20th, telling them that they were putting themselves in legal endangerment by partnering with the evil Christians (even if they were removed by at least one degree of separation.) While David Loy, director of the Sand Diego chapter of the ACLU, allowed for some praise for “public spirit,” he insisted that they were in violation of California’s No Aid Clause. The clause prohibits schools and other public institutions to give money to religious organizations. This, even though the money itself was coming not from public funds but from private donations made by the middle school students.

Hey, Great Job Guys…

And, as they so often do, the lawyers won. The San Marcos Unified School District told the local news that they would be donating the money only to Friends and Family Community Connection and severing any twice-removed ties with KATW. Thank god goodness liberalism! What would have happened if that money had made its way into the greedy, Christian hands of Kids Around the World? What if those kids in Tanzania had eaten meals that passed through a chapel? How many atheists might have been offended? Will someone please think of the atheists?

Alas, as our lawbreaking president is so fond of reminding us, we are a nation of laws. Those laws remain intact even when the basis for them is spurious and even when they provide us with little public benefit. Until we fight to remove them from the books, we can hardly blame lawyers, police, and politicians from carrying them out.

But really?

About Admin


  1. It’s funny how many of your readers rant about how many times Obama has violated the Constitution, yet none of them can give a specific example and how that act violates the Constitution. And now you publish an article bashing liberals for upholding the Constitution Why do you hate the Constitution and this great nation so much?

    • Liberalism is a serious mental condition which requires immediate psychiatric intervention.

    • In what way are the liberals “upholding the constitution”? And don’t use the so-called “constitutional separation of church and state” you lefties love to use, because IT’S NOT THERE. Read the first Amendment.

      • Pendy, I don’t have the time nor the inclination to give you a lesson on Constitutional Law. Tell me where in the constitution you find “right to privacy” mentioned or “right to a fair trial” Does that mean you don’t have a Constitutional right to those things? Those rights are inherent in the wording of the Constitution as determined by the Supreme Court. Try and read more than just the first amendment. Try reading some case law interpreting the first amendment. Get past 7th grade civics if you can

        • “Pendy, I don’t have the time nor the inclination to give you a lesson on Constitutional Law.” Nor the knowledge, apparently.

          “Tell me where in the constitution you find “right to privacy” mentioned”
          4th and 14th Amendments

          “Tell me where in the constitution you find “right to a fair trial” mentioned”
          6th and 14th Amendments

          • Here’s the 4th amendment
            “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

            You see the phrase “right to privacy”?? Thought not

            Would it help you if I typed slower?

            6th Amendment

            “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

            “Right to a Fair trial” Not mentioned nice try moron, you just proved my point

          • Yes, you are correct and we have applied names to them. However, let me give you the pesky little 1st Amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”. Now I know you would like to say that means there is a “separation of church and state”. Problem is that what it says is that the state cannot make a law that requires a certain religion. Let’s just look at this instance. Has the state in any way told people to what religion they must prescribe? So really what moron then interprets the Constitution to mean that nothing that has any affiliation, even in an ancillary way, is prohibited by the Constitution?
            In fact, any law that prohibits the kids in that school from raising money for the hungry children is actually unconstitutional!! See that part after the comma about making a law prohibiting the free exercise of religion? Nah, didn’t think so!! Your head is too far up your backside to see the problem with your interpretation.

          • Alright already children………..Why don’t both of you go ask our “king” about the Constitution ??? After all, he is supposed to be a “Constitutional Scholar”. Maybe he can give you his interpretation of our founding fathers Constitution and the meaning of it’s wording.
            BTW, yes, I have read the Constitution, numerous times from beginning to end. Also, the Declaration of Independence AND the Bill of Rights plus many of the Federalist Papers.

          • Not quite sure why I would be getting this response my direction. It seems that Jimmy King was being condescending and I thought he might need some additional learning. Since you have read all that information, do you have a thought?
            As for the “king”, I would really like to see his grades. But alas, unlike pretty much anyone else who has recently run for President, he thought he was better than us and that we did not need to see his qualifications.

    • How is this upholding the Constitution? I know your answer, but your lack of actually knowing the Constitution will sink you.

  2. It is way past time that WE THE PEOPLE told the ACLU, and SPLC, just where they can stuff their GODless crap..These pond scum leftists wouldn’t allow a starving American child some food from a Christian group, because it does not meet their GODless requirements..F’m..

    • Did somebody say “ACLU ” ??

      Ambulance Chasing Lawyers Union? …. AKA

      …….. All Criminals Living United?

      • Well, this has absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand, but I just had to tell it. And most of you will, undoubtedly be tickled shitless! Seems those stinkin mooselums were complaining about pork being on the lunch menu at a school in Quebec. The mayor told them plenty (too much for me to write), but what it boiled down to was the fact that the mayor, the school board and most of the town told the jerks, “Obviously you didn’t like it where you were, but WE DON’T CHANGE A DAMNED THING to make you happy. Learn our language, learn our lifestyle, and if that’s too much for you, then go the hell back where you came from!! WOOHOO! Gotta love the mayor!!!

        • Immigrants of yesteryear revered America’s lifestyle and customs, which is why they came in the first place. Not so with the easily offended foreign religion holders who come here and try to boss us around. Screw them. Do business as usual and turn our backs on their chicken-sh*t demands.

        • KUDOS to Quebec!!

        • Can’t see any P.C. cowards in our society doing that. The very few dictating to the rest of us.

      • Don’t forget the Anti Christian Liberals United. And just think every time they go to court we the people are forced into paying them which is why they don’t care if they win or lose.

      • American Communist Lawyers Union,

    • And the “NAACP” as well!!

  3. luvsgunsandamerica

    Liberalism and the Pres both deserve a .50 cal through their brain stems

  4. When good people do nothing, evil thrives. The real problem with these incidents lies mostly with Christians, they lack the knowledge and fortitude to fight evil outfits such as the aclu.

    Too many times they take the easy path and capitulate to the rantings of the godless. The time for turning the other cheek is long past. Good people both Christian and Conservative must fight against these evil incursions into our Freedoms or else just accept the consequences, roll over and play dead. Hell, that is what has gotten us into this mess in the first place.

    • John Tumore, its too bad you don’t understand the Constitutional freedoms we were all granted. You have your freedoms reversed

      • No I do not have my Freedoms reversed, the separation of church and state does not mean that the state and church can not co-mingle. What it means is that the government can not dictate what religion you belong to, Great Britain did for hundreds of years.

        It means that you have the right to your beliefs, but, you do not have the right to dictate to any person or government how they do or don’t worship. So if you don’t like a Nativity scene turn your head or avoid the area.

        The fact is that you as a minority do not have the right to dictate what the majority wants.

        If you want to live a godless life then go somewhere where people think the same as you, do not dictate to me or anyone else how to believe.

        • John you are exactly right! “Separation of Church and State” was designed by Jefferson (and many state constitutions) to prevent the government from interfering with the church.

          Here are some excerpts concerning where it came from:

          (As used in the United States, the term “Separation of Church and State” originated from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote in response to a letter he had received from Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut. Jefferson’s January 1, 1802 response (while he was sitting President) used the phrase, “wall of separation between Church and State.”)

          Jefferson’s letter:

          (To messers Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a
          committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.


          The affectionate sentiments of esteem & approbation which you are
          so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association,
          give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful & zealous
          pursuit of the interests of my constituents, and in proportion as they are
          persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more
          & more pleasing.

          Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between
          man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his
          worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not
          opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American
          people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an
          establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus
          building a wall of separation between church and state. [Congress thus
          inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to
          execute their acts, I have refrained from presenting even occasional
          performances of devotion presented indeed legally where an Executive is the
          legal head of a national church, but subject here, as religious exercises only
          to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.]
          Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the
          rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of
          those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced
          he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

          I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the
          common Father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves and your
          religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

          Th Jefferson

          • Oldvet69

            Thank you for your response. The statement;
            “the whole American
            people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an
            establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus
            building a wall of separation between church and state.”
            to me means that if a county or state wants to display a Nativity scene on their grounds there is no reason for them not to. It is only the so-called progressives that have a poblem with it. but the real problem they have is one of INTOLERANCE. They can not stand anything that stands for Freedom or that contradicts their beliefs. It is their way or the Highway.

            Well I for one am sick and tired of their BS!

          • John, Right again! By definition, LIBERALS are open-minded and tolerant of opposing views. PROGRESSIVES, by their very nature, cannot permit anything that is intolerable to change, such as the Christian beliefs or any type of traditional practices, to go unchallenged and permitted to exist. They simply believe that EVERYTHING and EVERYBODY must continually “progress” (change) for society to continue to flourish. They are wrong BUT, entitled to their beliefs. What they are not entitled to is any latitude (and certainly no support) to force their beliefs upon everyone else. That’s what makes progressives dangerous. Their forcing their beliefs onto others and often, getting the support of many in power to do it. Often time they are in a position of power. I am a die-hard Christian conservative that is probably more aligned with the Tea Party in the last number of years simply because of the GOP transgressing so far to the left of their traditional conservative values. The democrats have gone waaaay left, the GOP has filled the void they moved from, and the Tea Party have filled the GOP void. Both major political parties are now left (and progressive) leaning, making it almost an exercise in futility to even vote anymore. Look how the GOP rolled over on their first ‘fire-fight’ after the midterms. It isn’t that they are ‘concerned’ about losing elections, its just that they are acting on their own beliefs instead of those that they represent. A “cleansing” is needed in our government to regain our freedoms and to obtain the security for our lifestyles, our property, and our families as is outlined under our Constitution. A country and society of law must again be established and then Christian, Jew, Muslim, Atheist, straight, gay, bisexual, and all other people of differing beliefs can live together and flourish within the limits of freedom and rights outlined in our Constitution, so long as the state of law is upheld by all.

          • As far as I’m concerned liberals and progressives are one and the same. They’re like the Nicholiatains (followers of Nicholias, freethinkers) in the Book of Revelation and God told John that he hates them. If God hates them …….. I’d hate to be found in their shoes at Judgement!

      • Just who is the “we” in that sentence? Those of us living here a long time or the interlopers who don’t like our culture? Our constitution was intended to protect a preference for a certain culture and laws given to us by Moses. Cannibalism, for example, is not a protected culture by that definition. Atheism is practically the same thing.

        • Dantalbot, The “we” in John’s statement is ‘us’. You are correct that ‘our’ culture has grown and been defined primarily from people with Christian beliefs but, Christians were not the only people present and represented during the creation our Constitution which gave no preference to any “religion”, only to “natural law”. How our Founding Fathers understood what “natural law” was/is, was the most contributing force to the defining of our Constitution, not religion. But the Founders did often acknowledge the existence of, and belief in, Almighty God. Christians (in a general sense of that word) were the majority. Getting into a discussion with the intent to discredit Atheism is definitely an exercise in futility, especially with someone who believes them self to be one, so my advice on that issue is to avoid it. However, a Christian society (if it is truly Christian) does not cast out unbelievers (those not saved) they keep them close so they can bear witness to our examples of Christian life and beliefs and hopefully have their eyes opened to the Truth. Our constitution is supposed to insure our freedoms, rights, and security of property, life, and the pursuit of the same through laws enacted and enforced to those purposes. Having the freedom to eat other people. I don’t believe, was ever in our laws. Maybe somewhere in Africa, but not here.

      • Constitutional freedoms “granted?” I think freedoms were fought for, and died is the better!

    • OH I think Christians have Knowledge, I thinks it s the bravery and fortitude.. After what GOd has done for David and Moses and all those others in the Bible I don’t know why Christians are so chicken…

      • Yes, Christians do have knowledge, just not the kind they need to combat the godless. Fortunately most Christians don’t know how to play dirty politics, which is the only way to defeat the devils especially the ones in the current regime.

    • I was raised Christian, yes scripture says to “turn the other cheek”, but it only requires we do that once. We only have two cheeks after all. And yes, it also says to “live peaceably so long as it lieth within you”. But that don’t mean we have to allow ourselves to be walked all over by the heathen spirited people that disagree with us! It’s WAY past time for the Christian community to stand up and take back what God gave us in 1776 ….. A country we can live and serve him in!! Sometimes we have to do that by force, just like we did in 1776!! It’s time we start living the “Spirit of ’76” again and put down the “Spirit of 1968” (read Dinesh D’Suza’s “America, Imagine a World without Her” to understand what the means. I wouldn’t be able to do it justice).

  5. Why is it we are “helping kids” in Tanzania when there are American kids who need food?

  6. Why do idiots keep calling organizations such as the ACLU “Liberal”. There is nothing liberal about them. They demand that the entire world live their way. That’s called subjugation and repression. By the way, I’m an atheist and like most of us, really don’t care what you worship as long as your delusional religion is not calling for my conversion or death, and you are not demanding my tax money to support your religion. There are a few Christian organizations that I do support solely because of the humanitarian work that they do without taking huge salaries for heads of the organizations. At least they seem to be practicing what they preach.

    Take a lesson people, words have meaning. Stop referring to repressive doctrine as “Liberalism” and those spouting it as “Liberals”. These people are not interested in your freedom but in controlling your every movement and thought.

    • Toad, you are right. These organizations and people are progressives, not liberals. There is a difference. Progressivism is what demands you conform to their way of thinking.

  7. Yes we are living in the age of a total lack of common sense,let alone compassion. Too many people Genuflect at the altar of political Correctness. This sick notion that you can pick up a turd by its clean end.

    • A turd is a turd is a turd…..and we have a gang of queer turds running this once great nation. NOW the rest of the world is laughing their asses of at these TURDS in office..

  8. The school children were donating to a charity and not forced to do so. They were doing this of their own volition. So following the logic of the ACLU they should not be able to donate for any disaster that occurs. The bottom line is there are no tax dollars involved so what is the problem?

  9. Satan’s people

  10. It sounds like the school district is prohibiting someone the free exercise of their religion.

  11. What would America do if not for generosity? So many needy people who depend on the generosity of fellow Americans giving their hard earned salary to social benefits. Perhaps the ACLU should stop the government from distributing social assistance checks that help feed and shelter millions upon millions everyday. And American charity given by the government to other nations in $ Billions every year. Or is the government too big for the ACLU? They just pick on charitable children. I get it.

  12. the Aclu was founded by a Communist who’s mission statement was to destroy the US from within using our own laws to destroy us. He chose the Bill of Rights. Aclu are the lawyers for the 9/11 terrorist. Obama is doing the same with the constitution. They should be declared enemies of the state. The law suits are usually caved into since it cost too much to fight them.

  13. If we are a Nation of Laws how come he and his muslim, illegal and homosexual buddies get to ignore them?

  14. Isaiah 32:5-8King James Version (KJV)

    5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.

    6 For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.

    7 The
    instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to
    destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right.

    8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.

    King James Version (KJV)

    by Public Domain

    Isaiah a Prophet of God is speaking to the time yet to come when Jesus Christ returns in all of his Glory. Until this time churls [misers] and Liberals are the SCUM of the Earth and EVIL to their rotten cores.

  15. Dambocraps have always followed Satan’s directives, the DNC is founded upon everything that is contrary to Yah word. Shalom!

  16. No surprise on that headline.

  17. The problem with atheists is they can’t stand the fact that there are millions of people who, while they will support their freedom to be atheists, they don’t agree with them. Also I think at the back of their minds atheists are afraid that they might be wrong and would feel more comfortable if everybody agreed with them.

  18. Arrogant bunch of scum
    Corruption is their motto
    Loyal to evil
    Useless as teat on a boar hog

  19. If liberals all ate waste we would need no sewage plants. We need to gather all liberals up and send them to Iran for lessons in great liberalism,if they survive.

  20. Barack Obama’s statements on Christianity: “In our household, the Bible, the Koran and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology.” “Even those who claim the Bible’s inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages – the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ’s divinity – are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life.” “Those opposed to abortion cannot simply invoke God’s will–they have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths.”


    “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation.” “The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a Constitutional amendment to ban it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in counseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics.” “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.” “I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex—nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount.” The Audacity of Hope, Barack Obama Obama describes his definition of sin as, “Being out of alignment with my values.” “This is something that I’m sure I’d have serious debates with my fellow Christians about. I think that the difficult thing about any religion, including Christianity, is that at some level there is a call to evangelize and proselytize. There’s the belief, certainly in some quarters, that people haven’t embraced Jesus Christ as their personal savior that they’re going to hell.” “If all it took was someone proclaiming I believe Jesus Christ and that he died for my sins, and that was all there was to it, people wouldn’t have to keep coming to church, would they.” “And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” “I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”

    By Kevin M. Shipp
    Author, From the Company of Shadows
    November 6, 2014

  21. Why is America so stupid that they’re feeding other children around the world instead of the children right here in America who die or are going to die form starvation in the U.S.

  22. Why is it the smallest number of people are allowed to control our lives. Atheist 8% seem to control the other 92% of the people. When did the majority become voiceless and lose our balls to stand up for what is right. I post this under my own name, if it bothers you look me up I’m in Galveston area of Texas.

  23. And that just shows how stupid and outrageous people can really get—for the love of GOD oops did I just offend you—good, because they are innocent children and deserve better than idiots ruining a good meal for them—can’t wait for you to answer for that, I wonder what your excuse will be then—some way of dodging accountabilty I am sure

  24. Anybody still think the Liberal Bullies are hitting on all 8 cylinders?

    • Actually, liberals have been diagnosed as mentally ill.

      According to veteran psychiatrist, Dr. Rossiter, liberals are mentally and emotionally ill.

      Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

      Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the vast majority of the uneducated population by:

      • creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
      • satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;

      • augmenting primitive feelings of envy;

      • rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

      “The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says. “When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.” psychological disorder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *