Is The Fraudster Accusing Roy Moore of Sexual Assault Out for Revenge?

Breitbart has not exactly been an independent, nonpartisan source of news for the Roy Moore fiasco; Steve Bannon quite publicly put his chip on the Alabama Republican and no one is surprised to see his site playing the role of “head cheerleader” for the embattled candidate. While this means you have to take some of what’s being said on the site about Moore with a grain of salt, it doesn’t automatically invalidate all of their reporting. In fact, because they have such a vested interest in Moore’s victory, this scandal has actually inspired Breitbart to do some of their most remarkable investigative work to date.

Such was the case this week when the site unveiled court records pertaining to one of Moore’s accusers: Tina Johnson. Johnson has said that Moore grabbed her buttocks as she was leaving a meeting with the lawyer, supposedly “scarring her for life.” As dubious as that particular claim may be, Johnson’s history of criminal fraud and her actual reason for being in Moore’s office that day gives us plenty of reason to doubt her story. She has both the motive and the character to lie, and in a case where there is no solid evidence either way, that’s enough for us to favor Moore with the benefit of the doubt.

From Breitbart:

The documents, reviewed by Breitbart News, show that Moore represented Johnson’s mother in a nasty custody case for Johnson’s then 12-year-old son, Daniel Sitz. In the case, Johnson was repeatedly painted by Moore’s client as an unfit, absent, and unstable mother and was accused of taking her son from his elementary school against his will. Johnson’s mother was ultimately awarded custody in the case.

One affidavit signed by Johnson’s mother while she was represented by Moore accused Johnson of having a “violent nature” and noted that she “has been treated by a psychiatrist when she was approximately 15 years of age.” Johnson was a teenage mother.

Separate criminal documents show that, as late as 2010, Johnson was arrested and pled guilty to felony fraud charges related to checks belonging to a family member. She also entered a court drug program.

We know, we know. “Believe all women.” And it’s true that there’s nothing in these records that prove that Johnson is lying. You can be a terrible person with a motive for revenge and still wind up sexually assaulted by your mom’s lawyer. We guess?

But maybe before we continue this moral crusade against this man, we should think about what evidence we have, think about the women who are bringing these accusations against him, and just have a moment where we briefly entertain the notion – the POSSIBILITY – that he’s not actually the devil incarnate.

At the end of the day, this is up to the voters of Alabama. But we’d encourage them to at least take a glance at what some of these fine, upstanding women were up to before they appeared in the pages of the Washington Post and on the set of the Megyn Kelly show.

About Admin

171 comments

  1. How frustrating it must be for the Left.

    The hypocrites are casting stones, and bigger ones are coming back at them….

    • What left – there isn’t one in the US, bar about 2000 in the Communist Party of USA, though they’re socialists with a free-market folk really.

      • Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It Sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        fs214d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleHomeCashJobsPartyOpportunity/earn/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::fs214lhhhhh

      • Hi Troll,

        Denial is the devils greatest invention isn’t it? Is that why you use it so often?

        One of the most clever things the devil did was convince man that he did not exist.

        • Well I exist, no denial – just facts.

          • You really do believe that repeating your lies enough times will make them true don’t you?

            That only works with those foolish enough to believe them in the first place.

          • I’ll stop when you can refute one with a reputable reference.. I’ll be waiting!

          • I don’t believe you.

          • I haven’t lied once! Unlike yourself.You may have believe, but facts prove you incorrect time after time.

          • Knowingly spreading false statements is a lie in itself. But you take it a step further, you spread false statements even after they have been proven to you to be false.

            Such a high percentage of your stuff is insults I can’t remember the last statement you provided with anything more than insults… riposte boy….

          • Name one false statement – good luck!

          • Still no proof of one lie that I have supposedly told – whereas you have them coming out of your ears.
            Still waiting for you to explain HOW???????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • You don’t recognize those either, so why bother?

          • I recognise reputable reference – further I acknowledge my indiscretion. Half-wit!

          • Even if I was only an half wit, that’s half more than you have.

          • That’s “a” halfwit – correction, corrections!

          • No, the CORRECT usage of the English language treats the “h” at the beginning of a word as a vowel and therefore precedes it with “an” as the article.

          • “Sometimes with words that begin with h, the h sound is not pronounced. Unfortunately there is no rule about when the h is silent. Let’s look at an example.

            an honour – the h is silent. We use an because the honour has a vowel sound because the h is not pronounced: (h)onour.

            a historic day – the h is pronounced.”

            Try again – my wife did English at Oxford, very helpful! Remedial English beckons, me thinks!

          • Sorry the rule here has been “an” before an “h” word for DECADES since before I was born.

          • Back to school then! Fail!

          • You are incorrect. It is a half wit

          • What about the word herb? Describes plants used in cooking? Yes there is the name herb where the h is pronounced, but as a English buff I can tell you that the rules we are taught are also broken! It used to confuse me in school.

          • Before the plant word “herb” it’s an, and before the name “Herb” you don’t use an article, definite or indefinite, anyway. It’s not the rules were “broken” so much as that they were inconsistently taught and applied and now not at all, even the spelling rules.

          • I believe his name says everything you need to know about him.

          • You repeating a lie method works. Here’s a national example. This has been going in since the late 80s, now it is fact:
            Even though both the wall and computer calendars say this is the twentieth century (2017). The media has tricked a vast majority of people into thinking this is the twenty first (2117) century…………
            “Those who control the media, will control the masses”-Jim Morrison

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/eb6dd545aa6ec3a02dfd4c071f7bd29e8d9295ecaad3c4957d31e838e3325f73.png

          • Without a corrupt and complacent MEDIA, the Left would still be in Russia killing dissidents.
            Fight the Corrupt MEDIA at http://www.madashellboycott.com
            Join the fight.
            Stop MEDIA Bias Now!
            Stop Fake News Now!

          • Ha, ha, ha! Where’s your Yuri spiel? Done, dusted – USSR evolved, maybe you should.
            History lesson – Yuri dead, 25 years ago, a drunk. His theory didn’t pan out did it – USSR fell, China is evolving as is Cuba, only N Korea, Vietnam and Laos left and the latter two are moving on as well.
            Who has control in the US? Big business, they own both parties – why on earth would they want communist policies? So we all have to buy cigarettes and a gun? Ha, ha, ha – your argument is foolish.
            So how’s Trump going to change this – I’m still waiting?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            You have nothing, at best you’re paid by those big businesses but why would they employ a buffoon?

          • Stop complaining , the media is doing fine otherwise they’d be printing the drivel on here or that you emit. Facts and credibility – thank God!

          • So what do you call the first 100 years? The nothing century, the 0th century, what?

          • You mean the first 99 years https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/eb6dd545aa6ec3a02dfd4c071f7bd29e8d9295ecaad3c4957d31e838e3325f73.png . You accidentally hit the ball out of the park. When you start counting, you start w/zero.
            Believe the numbers, not the TV…………..

          • The 20th Century consisted of the last 100 years of the second millennium of the Gregorian calendar (the one we and the rest of humanity use). It began at 12 A.M. on January 1 of the year 1900 A.D. and concluded at 12 A.M. of December 31 of the year 1999 A.D. We are now 17 years, 11 months, and 2 days into the 21st Century. Wall and computer calendars accurately reflect this FACT.

            As of the end of the year 1999, 2000 years had passed since the beginning of the current era. The last 100 years of that period constituted the 20th Century. It is over and done with.Thus, we are living in the next 100 years, specifically in the 21st Century.

            If you have trouble understanding this, then consider a simpler example, using fewer digits. The First Century began in the year 1 A.D. Thus the Second Century began at the end of 100 A.D. Beginning in the year 101 A.D. those then alive were living in the Second Century, even though the years in which they lived started with the numeral 1. Similarly, we who are now living are the 21st Century, even though the first two digits of our current year are 20.

            There are enough absurd conspiracy theories making the rounds on right wing media without you or anyone else cranking out the silly notion that the media have somehow perverted our method of keeping up with the centuries.

          • Simple math rule
            You never count your starting point.
            4+x=7
            x is three. Here’s why.
            We already have 4. So we count the next digit first until we reach our goal of 7. We have 5,6,7. That is 3 digits so x has to be 3, right?
            If we count from our starting point of 4; 4,5,6,7 that would make x=4, (4+4=7 ) Witch is an incorrect equation. Because 4+4=8 is the correct equation.
            Until you can dispute this.
            It has to be the twentieth century.

          • I do not need to dispute your fallacious reasoning. I need only to show you in the most simple and graphic way that this is indeed the 21st Century. Simple inarguable proof!

            Years CENTURY

            0-100 First–the first 100 years, i.e. First Century

            100-200 Second

            200-300 Third

            300-400 Fourth

            400-500 Fifth

            500-600 Sixth

            600-700 Seventh

            700-800 Eighth

            800-900 Ninth

            900-1000 Tenth

            1000-1100 Eleventh

            1100-1200 Twelfth

            1200-1300 Thirteenth

            1300-1400 Fourteenth

            1400-1500 Fifteenth

            1500-1600 Sixteenth

            1600-1700 Seventeenth

            1700-1800 Eighteenth

            1800-1900 Nineteenth

            1900-2000 Twentieth

            2000-2100 Twenty-first–The current 100-year period, i.e. the 21st Century!

            Only by illogically discarding the First Century and beginning with the second hundred years (100-200) as the First Century will your irrational means of reckoning centuries “work,” and it will work incorrectly, since it makes no sense to ignore the first 100 years.

          • You haven’t disputed my equation. Second by your own number/timeline IT backs up what I say. You never count the starting point. After you do, right away you double up and start at 200??? You must achieve 100 before you hit the century mark.
            How come your bank does not count like this? I mean you did have $99 in the account first, didn’t you? Does the money in your account skip 100-199 and start at 200. No, I’m sure it does not.
            I sure wish you were my banker!!!!

          • You want a starting point? ZERO (0) is my starting point. It is the beginning of the FIRST Century, which lasts 100 years, that being the period 0-100. You would irrationally have the First Century to begin only after 100 years have passed just as you irrationally count the period 2000-2100 as the 20th Century. To reach the Year 2000, 2000 years, i.e. 20 centuries, must have passed and the 20th Century must have concluded. Do you dispute that? I showed you clearly and graphically that 20 Centuries or 2000 years have passed since the starting point of the Gregorian calendar. Start at the top of my list, above, and count the number of centuries from Year 0 to Year 2000. If you are capable of counting that high, you will see that it is 20 CENTURIES, followed by the period 2000-2100, which is the 21st Century.

            More baby food for thought just for you:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21st_century

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_century

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_century

            http://www.definitions.net/definition/21st%20century

            “21st century

            The 21st century is the current century of the Anno Domini era or the Common Era, in accordance with the Gregorian calendar. It began on January 1, 2001, and will end on December 31, 2100. It is the first century of the 3rd millennium. It is distinct from the century known as the 2000s, which began on January 1, 2000 and will end on December 31, 2099.”
            http://www.definitions.net/definition/21st%20century

            Just straight math and common sense, Mark Clemens, not some absurd media conspiracy. It is YOU who are confused, not the media. It is YOU who are out of touch with the universally recognized system of reckoning the centuries. Now get busy and renew your membership in the Flat Earth Society!

          • Math rule #2
            You never count zero.
            Zero has NO VALUE.
            It is there to hold the place until a number of value comes along.
            20+1=21
            The zero in 20 is there to hold the single value column place. The two is there to hold the second power of 10 (twenties) column.
            I understand this might be hard to accept if you are under 40, maybe even 50.
            Since you were young everything, everyone has repeated this fabrication.
            You are even passing it along to me. Despite what the calendar says, and despite 2 mathematical rules have to be broken to make this 21st century jazz work. If you have to break a mathematical rule to make an equation work. The equation is bogus!!
            Also in the mid 17th century (Revolution Period) The existing calendar was changed. While they were changing inaccuracy. Why did they NOT adjust the century, since it was 100 years off??
            See how propaganda works??

          • I am more than two decades beyond 50 years of age and have entertained the same concept of numbering the centuries for my entire adult life. Blessedly, I never bought into YOUR deranged systematics. I note that you ignored the plain, simple and incontrovertible tabular presentation I provided that demonstrates to any sentient being that we are indeed in the 21st Century! I am through matching WITS with you since you obviously come to the fray only HALF equipped.

          • Yes! We are in the 21st century! Even the extreme right won’t argue that! We count our calendar as the 2000 century is done and we are working on the 21st century! What idiot thought this was an issue to fight about here?

          • ….Maybe the extreme right are the ones brain washing you??????

          • Said idiot goes by the name of Mark Clemens, who buys into the absurd notion that since the late 1980s, there has been some kind of nefarious plot, championed by the certain elements of the media (the ubiquitous enemy of the right), to “trick” the masses into believing that we are in the 21st Century. Said idiot cavalierly dismisses the massive trove of logic and chronology that clearly shows otherwise. It is a characteristic of right wing extremists to believe WHAT they believe solely because they WANT to believe it. With such nutjobs, emotion always trumps logic and facts.

          • Looks like the trick worked on you!!!! Despite simple 3rd grade math disproving the propaganda. Your main problem is you think to much of your self. You probably never admit mistakes, much less admitting you have been tricked. That’s how propaganda works, the victim believes it 100% and never knows he/she has been tricked.

          • “I am more than two decades beyond 50 years of age I have entertained the same concept of numbering the CENTURIES of my entire adult life”
            Your opening statement does not add up.
            If you are two decades beyond 50 years, that makes you 70 years (give or take).
            A century is 100 years. Now please tell me how you can count “The CENTURIES” of your life?
            You are not even a century old!!!! Just like it being the 21st century. Your age and counting multiple centuries, just don’t add up!!

          • What does not add up is your woeful incompetence in deriving obvious meanings. I made no claim, overt or implicit, to have lived a century or more. What I wrote is that “I…have entertained the same concept of numbering the centuries for my entire adult life.” Entertaining such a concept DOES NOT equate to making any personal claim of longevity. I entertain a certain personal concept as to the estimated age of the universe, but that does not mean that I claim to be as old as the universe. There, I have violated my pledge to abstain from further dialog with you. However, your latest eructation of raving nonsense was so absurdly inane as to make it impossible for me to remain silent.

          • I do not see that opening statement in the same light. It sounds like you entertain the thought of counting how many centuries you lived in your life time. Which is physically impossible.
            Also you do not refute any math I dispute this propaganda with. Now you don’t want to talk about calendars. Why? I wonder. Since that the only way to refute what I say. Simple reason, you have nothing but a flawed time line. Were I showed you the errors in it. You can show no mathematical flaw in my disputes of Wiki-Math.
            So unless you have a working formula showing you count the starting point.
            Have a formula showing zero has value. This is still the 20th century.
            Here’s a little more to think about. If Wikkipeida is right. Why do we use the present calendar? It’s off by 100 years. Would you use a watch running 10 hours slow???
            🎄🎅🎁

          • Alanna's Whore Tat

            Lifetime is one word. You’re inept.

          • Let me show how ridiculous Wikkipeida’s counting method is. Apparently counting centuries is confusing. Lets count millenniums. There are only two right?
            Not the way Wikkipeida counts here look.
            The calendar says this is the SECOND millennium, right?
            Ok the way Wikkipeida counts this should be the THIRD millennium. Here’s why.
            The years from 1-999 are ONE millennium.
            The years from 1000-1999 have to be the SECOND millennium.
            The years from 2000-2900 are the THIRD millennium.
            We are in the year 2017. Do you think this is the 30th century (3017)?
            By Wikkipeida math, it has to be……..

          • Alanna's Whore Tat

            The name is Wikipedia, you idiot. If you grasped the concept of a ‘wiki’, and knew the word ‘encyclopedia’ you could not make such a dumb mistake.

          • You are not 1 year old until you have lived 1 year! The year 100 was preceded by 100 yrs! So the year 2100 would be preceded by 2100 years

          • The year 2000 A. D “finished” the twentieth century. We are now 17 years into the twenty-first century.
            It wouldn’t make sense to say we are 17 more years into the twentieth century which ended in 2000.
            Time has been counted in this manner for at least many hundreds of years.

          • You repeating what HeadonStrong says, doesn’t make it true. Anyways numbers do not work like your saying.
            How can 2000 end the 20th century? When 2000 is the beginning of the 20th century. The twentieth century will go from 2000-2099. Just like the 2000s work on a number line. All number families start with zero and end with nine (20 is the start of the 20s. 29 is the end of the 20s)
            Does your banker count like you and HeadonStraight?When you have $2000 the next dollar will not make the sum $2100, will it? No the sum will be $2001 not $2100……….

          • Alanna's Whore Tat

            You stupid MF’r…

          • You are an ignorant Whore!
            Your handle says it all.
            Looks like third grade math messes with your slut mind. Show me how smart you are. What did I say in that post that is incorrect?

          • Alanna's Whore Tat

            For starters, stupid…you used the word your in place of you’re. Those words are not in any way interchangeable.

            The common word your refers to something possessed by the person you are addressing, whereas the equally common word you’re is a contraction of the words you and are.

            How is it even possible that a grown man does not grasp these very simple concepts?

          • Did your last Trick not get you off?? How did you get into hooking? You must be a out of work school teacher turned nasty whore.
            🚦=💰
            😃😀😍😁😂😆😷😎

          • You used the word your in place of the correct word you’re. That’s pretty stupid.

          • Sorry, you wouldn’t recognize an actual fact if it ran you over with a tank.

          • I cross reference to reveal truth and easily spot hyperbole and BS. you’re smokin’.

          • When you’re “cross referencing” to LIES, it makes NO difference!

          • Ha, ha, ha. No actually the lies pop to the top straight away! Find me a story that is factual on Alt-right News this year.

          • There is no “alt-right” it’s just more left, and you are correct that the left hasn’t published a truth this year, or in fact, for decades.

          • You’re on it dippy! I don’t associate folk here with Republicans – most of them here have no idea how the country works and are somewhat Nazi like.

          • you and sandra spend alot of time together . Why not go to dinner?

          • She’s probably married to her siblings and got two heads.

          • ……So you are saying she’s a man?

          • Don’t think so.

          • Alot is not a word. You’re stupid.

          • I don’t consider myself a republican, I consider me as a conservative. Republicans have very little to distinguish themselves from democrats. They even have a term for that! RINOS and DINOS go figure! I believe nextto Hillary, Trump was the best choice. The RINOS and Dino’s can’t control him! He is not at heart a republican. He is about money. And right now that is what America needs! We don’t need another politician that listens to lobbyists that have their own agendas!
            We have been hearing for years how the house has been using SSI as a slush fund and now it’s going bankrupt. How about those harrassment payoffs! Where did that money come from? Planned Parenthood maybe? I’m sick of politics as usual. I don’t know all the facts and I’ll tell you most Americans don’t! Our media has betrayed us for partisan politics that pay them better! We need to shut them down too! Stop reading, subscribing, watching them! Let them know they are not performing to standards!
            I’m tired of America being sold to outsiders! No other country allows non citizens to own land in their country. We have sold a land to many countries. Maybe that is why the Bureau Of Land Management has been so active in recent years!

          • Clinton/Trump, cow or a pig? Both a joke, both repugnant.
            Good news, President has zip power, Congress is in charge, the plutocracy rolls on – suck it up.
            Media irrelevant, Congress is owned by the 1% – no change, America is stuffed and deservedly so.

          • Date line November 2016
            Donald Trump won the general election.
            This story was all over right wing media, and it was true……

          • I did say this year, but you deserve an up vote for that – well done!

          • You must mean an tank! LOL

          • Go learn English Grammar please: I posted what I meant.

          • Testy eh? It was just a joke because of the previous a/an controversy. LOL means laugh out loud. Just playin’ Sandra

          • I’ve heard that from abusers before! It wasn’t funny.

          • Then I can just assume you are ignorant!

          • No; just experienced and not putting up with it any longer.

          • I have no further comment for u Sandra. You obviously have some problems.

          • I certainly do; YOU and those like you with your sick attitudes!

          • U really need some professional help

          • I AM a professional!

          • Albeit a very sick one!

          • No, I’m not; I recognize reality for what it is; the left can’t say the same.

          • Look, this all started out as a lesson in grammar, with jibs and jabs about how to use a and an when silent letters preceded the word. It was lighthearted at best. I said that in an earlier post and then u said I was an abuser. What that means I do not know but u have really taken it to an extreme. This is my last attempt.

          • hey poo? are you white? Than shut up

          • What does that have to do with anything? Obviously you are not – “Then…shut up” and punctuation! Y’all from Jamaica maaaaan!?

          • The Marley bud is overrated. Humbolt grows better.

          • I think it’s THEN shut up

          • Then, you imbecile.

        • Don’t even get into it with this troll, he’s in Australia the land of kangaroos and sheep herders…they don’t have women they do livestock.

          • YEPPIE!!! SHEEP PUSSY- IT HEAR THEY SMELL LIKE HILLARYS SNATCH- ITS SO FUNKY SINCE NO ONE HAS BEEN IN THAT BUSH IN SO LONG – IT SMELLS LIKE LIMBURGER CHEESE ON A GOOD DAY!!! I’LL BET THAT THE CANKER IN THERE WOULD TAKE 2 LAYERS OF PENIS SKIN RIGHT OFF IN THE FIRST 2 INCHES IN!!
            THAT IS ONE OF THOSE BITCHES WE CALLED “HIT IT AND JACK AND RUN AND WASH IT OFF” WITH ALCOHOL AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 10% AND HOPE THE LITTLE GUY DOES NOT DROP OFF WHILE YOUR ASLEEP- OR WHEN YOU GO TO THE BATHROOM AND REACH FOR HIM AND HE FALLS OFF IN THE COMMODE. THAT’S SOME BAD “POONTANG “

          • For sheer vileness and obscenity you take first prize. Do you talk like you write and, if so, if that the same mouth you kiss(ed) your Mama with? What a low, shameless being you are!

          • HEY, THANKS FOR THE FLOWERS- MAKES ME FEEL GOOD THAT I STAND UP FOR SOMETHING- THAT IS TO TAKE ON SLUGS LIKE YOURSELF HERE ON THIS PUBLIC FORUM RAN BY BULLIES LIKE YOU AND HUNDREDS OF OTHER WITH THE SAME SUPERIORITY ATTITUDE. MY SHIELD AND I SAY IT THE WAY IT SHOULD BE SAID HAS MADE ME AND MY FAMILY A LITERAL SMALL MANS FORTUNE IN LIFE. IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE TRUTH THEN DON’T STIR UP THE FIRE ANT BED BECAUSE YOU WILL GET STUNG ALL OVER YOUR WHITTLE BODY. AND WHAT EVER YOU ARE IN GENDER OR YOU ARE TRYING TO BE ” YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET IF YOU START UP ON MY ASS.
            AND AS FOR YOUR HANDLE OF HEADSONSTRAIGHT THAT MUST BE YOUR PERSONAL INTERPRETATION AND SELF CHECK ON YOUR OWN MIND YOU THINK IS WORKING LIKE A FINE OILED MACHINE. WELL MAYBE YOU SHOULD CHECK SOME OF THE OPERATING SYSTEMS FOR HAVING CORRUPT FILES BECAUSE HEADS ON STRAIGHT ENGINE IS NOT FIRING ON AT LEAST HALF OF ITS CYLINDERS.
            WALK A MILE OR 2 BLOCKS IN MY WORLDLY SHOES AND WHERE THIS BODY SURVIVED AT IN THIS WORLD AND I’M STILL STANDING TO FIGHT SHIT LIKE YOU ALL OVER AGAIN. I HAVE NEVER BACK DOWN FROM A FIGHT PHYSICAL OR MENTALLY AND WILL NOT START WITH YOUR DUMB-ASS. HAVE A BAD DAY TURDFACE!!! BLOCKED

      • I am not certain where you have been, but the Democrat party has had a platform of socialism since well before FDR. The Communist Party of the USA head guy was asked during FDR whether they would be putting up any candidates. He responded ‘ Why? The Democrats have stolen all of our planks.’ (that is a paraphrase).

        After about the year 2000 the remaining old guard Democrats died off or left the party, and the party has been communist-run ever since. I lived through it – just because they don’t say it, doesn’t mean it is not true. Obama ran as a communist in 2007-8 using platitudes and promises that are 100% Marxist inspired. Where were you? I lived through his consistent ‘transparency’ which means total opacity – they hid everything they did from us and from Congress with a total fawning propaganda machine to help them. It took Judicial Watch going through the judicial branch to find out that the State Department was giving away state secrets through Hillary, etc., etc. etc.

        Now they have embedded thousands of infiltrators into the bureaucracy to thwart the will of the people to the point where the Congress does nothing, the President who is a Republican finds the social justice judges thwarting him from doing what they had no problem with when Obama did it. And the Democrat President, Obama, could do anything he wanted with impunity. They were in the process of milking the country for all of its wealth when the election foiled their move.

        Why do you think that there has been a continuing attempt to ‘get’ the President, but when the only real evidence they found was against Hillary and the Democrats, they ignore it and go after Flynn rather than John Podesta?

        Your facts are about as factual as the place you found them – the garbage.

        • By policy they equate to UK Conservative, not Labour – the main difference between them and the Republicans is abortion, LGBT and gun regulation. The latter two the Conservatives introduced, the former mostly supported. Fail!

        • Goes back to at least the Wilson administration.

        • Jdubya,
          . . . . Boy, you hit the nail right on top of the head. Good swing. While we are at it let’s not forget the other 30 million communists that are trying to take over and the thousands more that are being pumped out by the colleges and the universities every year.
          America: Love It or Leave It!
          GOD Bless and GOD Help us,
          rich!

          • AREN’T COMMUNIST WHITE TOO?

          • All colors – education!

          • Are you stupid ? Or just a jerk?

          • Never refuted.

          • Asks the dumb MF’r that cannot discern the simple words then and than, and somehow thinks alot is an actual word.

          • Kenneth,
            . . . . Please turn your caps lock off. I don’t like being yelled at. communists come in all colors, creeds, and races.
            America: Love It or Leave It!
            GOD Bless and GOD Help us,
            rich!

          • Not in Africa or Cuba, or Venezuela

          • Communists come in all skin hues. You do know China is Communist, right? I do believe the social perversion called Communism was hatched in the twisted minds of top NY and London liberal elites. Russia’s descent into Communist hell did not come out of Russia, but New York.

          • I thought Karl Marx was a German, not a Marx Brother……..

          • There is more to it than meets the eye. Study. I don’t have time to go into these things anymore.

          • ………You have to study also.

          • I know of Karl Marx. I also have a lot of real world things to do.

          • True Communism was practiced by the first European settlers that came to America. It didn’t work then and has not worked in any nation since.

          • I am not certain it was true communism but it certainly was true socialism. Since socialism most often leads to communism it can be presumed you are correct.

            What you say here is true. It is described factually in a short documentary called “America the untold story.” “Where there is no vision the people perish.” Proverbs 29:18 I know it “was” available, I believe, on Amazon.

            Those pilgrims had to agree to a socialistic government the Europeans insisted would guarantee their survival, in order to get sponsors to come here, which nearly caused their demise. Those pilgrims learned the hard way. The story hinges around the American Indian and the first Thanksgiving.

            Life was hard at that time but the pilgrims were a hardy lot determined to survive in this the new world. Although many starved to death the first year the colony did survive. Thanks in part at least to the American Indians close by.

            The documentary is extremely educational and worth the small price.

          • Communist means just one. You’re very stupid for a grown man.

        • How dare you call the Earths MESSIAH A COMMUNIST.

        • Obama broke two records, one was number of lawsuits against freedom of information, and the other was for public records that couldn’t be found or consider lost !!!! And he said he was the most transparent President, go figure !!!

        • I thought I was the only one who thought like you.

      • Try the whole DemoRAT party along with their allies, the neocon RINO phonies who pretend to be conservative only when campaigning.

    • Ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • and may cause more MENTAL problems for these BASTARDS!…………Pelosi will really bREAK DOWN next time she goes public…

    • Joan Ferrantesimplyme

      More like BOULDERS coming at em!!!

  2. The “rush to judgment,” encouraged by the media, in the wake of the clamber to get on the bandwagon by the purported victims of unwanted, non-consensual, sexually-motivated misconduct, harassment or assault, denying the presumption of innocence before being proved guilty in a court of law, was grossly unfair. It was done in liberal, partisan-political fashion (my team can be as corrupt as it wants, but your team can not engage in the same corruption). What this does to the concept of law is that which makes our current political climate a laughingstock.
    The left cries “foul” over “equal justice” but will not consider how grossly inconsistent they are in the equal applicability of the law—TO ALL, not just the opposing party and its members. Given his public record, his well-publicized stand on the Ten Commandments and the probable scrutiny which the local media in Alabama have, undoubtedly, given to the member of their justice system with respect to its integrity and its reputation, it really seemed highly unlikely that such allegations and accusations could have been true.
    The lesson for Americans needs to be that we do NOT try people in the media. Each, regardless of the party, deserves his proper day in court where the facts are presented and a jury decides the guilt or innocence of the accused. In rare exceptions, the verdict may not be correct, but due process of law is far more decisive and conclusive than endless speculation by the media, meant to weaken the rule of law. We know, after all, that it is the weakening of the rule of law to allow behaviors which are obviations, violations and mere exercises in the freedom of choice regarding law, which is at the heart of the agenda of the left.

    • Well written, intelligent, and well reasoned. thank You. As a fellow West Point Graduate of Roy Moore, albeit a decade earlier, I believe him because of the Training inculcated at West Point. The Motto is “Duty, Honor, Country”! and the Honor Code is “A Cadet does not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those that do!” All of the graduates that I know from experience and direct contact make that Honor Code and the Motto an unassailable part of their character for the rest of their lives. Roy Moore’s history before these scurrilous accusations certainly reflect those admirable qualities. I have no reason to disbelieve Roy Moore and no good reason to believe these three scurrilous accusations from women who have a past history of lies, deception, and working for the DemocRAT Party. I believe these women have either been paid large sums of money for their accusations, or have revenge in mind in addition, based on their past record and relationships with Roy Moore as a Judge or Attorney! Alabama voters will decide for themselves and I am certain that they are wise enough to discern the truth and elect Roy Moore to the Senate in overwhelming numbers! Edward C. Olivares Sr, USMA 1957. Resident and voter in Alabama from 1970 -1978, and currently resident and voter in Monroe, Virginia. If I were still in A labama, I would definitely be voting for Roy Moore!

      • Sad to say that the whole honor code of the academies has become, in recent decades, a rather bad joke; but it was so when you and Moore attended, still. And then there’s the matter of timing; he’s run for high public offices multiple times before without a single 1 of these women coming forward to accuse him, in up to 4 decades’ time; and yet all of a sudden they all run to WaPo? And we should just believe them on their say so? None of them was young enough at the time of these alleged offenses to have repressed the memories; that happens in very early childhood attacks, but not adolescents, and certainly not with the kinds of “attacks” they are claiming. And as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I see NONE of the signs in these women of someone truly sexually abused; which also makes me suspect their motives. That nearly all the allegations have already been refuted as outright falsehoods, goes even further. I’ve never lived in AL, but I also would vote for Moore if I did live there, unless someone comes up with actual evidence of his wrongdoing; because 30-40 year old unsubstantiated allegations just don’t do it for me. Too many women who have worked with him over those decades say different and support him.

        • No surprise what large sums of CASH will do for SUPPOSED “repressed memories”. and all it took was a CORRUPT BUNCH OF Anti-Trump LIBERALS to get them to “surface” again.
          That and the above mentioned CASH.

        • You are quite correct about the deterioration of the Honor Code. It started in 1978-1982 when my son was a cadet. The Honor Committee convicted a Cadet of an Honor violation and the Academy Staff and Superintendent declined to expel. The cadet was silenced, then news media got involved and an attorney sued. Since then, an attorney is present to represent any cadet accused of an honor violation, and the Cadet Honor Committee has an attorney advising them on what they can and cannot do. Subsequent Superintendents, especially during the Obama Administration, have ruled that Cadets will not necessarily be expelled for Honor violations. they will be counseled, and recycled. So Yes, I do not have that much confidence in the Honor Code at USMA these days. However, in my time and in the time of Judge Roy Moore as a cadet, we truly ran the Honor System, and believed in it whole-heartedly. We were supported by the top staff not only at USMA but out in the Army. I know of a Cadet who lied about a marriage when he returned from leave. He graduated, and it was discovered that he had lied, and his Commission was revoked!That was back before 1978!

          • Yes sir; I knew it was somewhere in the late ’70s so well after Moore, who is my age, went through. I remember seeing it and being very saddened by it. I don’t know if the presence of attorneys is a help or not; although our city attorney does a good job of keeping our council on track, for all he was USAF and a JAGman, before coming here. I would hope so, but I haven’t seen a whole lot of evidence it has done, as yet. I do try to keep up via military news sites. And like you, I do remember cadets being expelled from all the academies for honor violations before that time. I HOPE they’ll bring that back and use it.

  3. Yep. Revenge. What a “credible” witness. I wonder how much she was paid to “come forward”.

  4. With her background, and the mom’s character, she and her mother would have loved the idea of a lawyer liking the girl. At that time and place, they would have been thinking MARRIAGE!

  5. What? Breitbart has not been an independent source – why do you say that? It is absurd to claim that just because they have supported the candidate their reporting is somehow tainted and worthless – this kind of statement is unconscionable at its best. Complain if they bring something up that is not germane, complain if they hide something or misstate the facts – but TAKE IT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT? How utterly arrogant can you be!

    I would say that you need to do some thinking before you start writing stupid things!!!

  6. Isn’t it interesting how the “Rule of Unintended Consequences” has come to play in all this.

    The “Swamp Intent” was to defame Judge Moore. The result has been, suddenly a large number of liberal democrats are found with their pants around their ankles being charged with sexual abuse in the workplace…. The nation is incensed by the claims against Moore which have been debunked by facts and details, yet claims against the likes of Wienstein, Franken, Conyers. and half of hollywood are supported by huge evidence.
    For example… just this morning, Matt Lauer was fired 5 minutes before going on air. His $20,000,000 contract canceled… because of guess what … sexual abuse.

    The tide is changing… Must be the swamp draining…or is the sewer.

  7. If I had a nickel for every surgeon who did that in the middle of my 10 minute pre-surgery scrub, which you can’t stop or you have to start again, I’d have at least a few dollars. And as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I can honestly state that, while I didn’t like it, it certainly didn’t “scar me for life”; indeed, if that’s what most are complaining about, they NEED to GROW UP and learn to take LIFE on the chin! That’s ANNOYING, but not disaster! That’s mostly “little boys” telling you they like you. Someone grabbing your breasts intentionally or while you can’t react is another matter. Rape, or intentional continued molestation are sexual assault, or doing so while you’re incapacitated, those are the sexual assaults that harm. A smack or pinch on the butt offends but doesn’t harm. Ruining a man’s life over that is obscene!

  8. Can you say boomerang? Or better yet, karma?

  9. Same problem the Colonists had with King George: “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

  10. In America you can find many to lie for 15 minutes of fame

  11. Roy Moore will win by a landslide, just like President Trump did. Fake News, Fake Accusations will not hinder Moore. Roy Moore will be elected. MAGA

  12. I am always skeptical of people filing these types of claims especially when they are 37+ years old. How can you defend against this?

  13. The truth will come out! Casting slurs and aspersions is nothing new. Often times, the accusations cannot be proven; however, a deep sense of distrust is the result, and detractors will jump on the “band wagon” and keep the suspicions going! Do they care about the alleged offense? No! They use the suspicion in order to further their political aims. Sometimes, it backfires and allegations suddenly arise and abound against many others, especially those in power! And isn’t it interesting that many if not most of the ensuring accusations are against arrogant liberals!

  14. How frustrating it must be for Moore supporters to learn he was seen sniffing the bicycle seats of the girls bicycles at the junior high school today. He just can not control his compulsive behavior.

  15. FROM WHAT THIS WOMAN LOOKS LIKE NOW- IT WOULD OF BEEN HARD FOR ME TO GET REAL EXCITED ABOUT ROLLING HER OVER IN THE ALABAMA CLOVER. IT WOULD BE A TOSS UP – EITHER THE RIGHT HAND OR JUST NOT GOING TO ROLL HER IN ANYTHING. THIS GUY COULD OF HAD ANY WOMAN HE WANTED- AND HE WENT FOR HER. I THINK THE HAND WOULD OF BEEN MORE FULFILLING AND ENJOYABLE!! REALLY SHE IS A DOUCHE BAG LOOKING BROAD. BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE LOCAL ALABAMA BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON’S PATSY FUND . JUST SAY WHAT WE TELL YOU AND WE WILL MAKE YOU RICH FOR A WEEK UNTIL OUR HIT MEN COME TO YOUR FRONT DOOR.

  16. I’M SO GLAD I WAS NOT HER PERSONAL AGENT – SHE COULD OF MADE HIM OR US DO ANYTHING TO KEEP OUR JOBS – LIKE BONE HER IN THE LIMO WHILE BILL WAS BONING IN THE OVAL OFFICE. HAVING TO DO HILLARY WOULD ALMOST MAKE A GOOD MAN GO QUEER !!! I DON’T THINK FABREEZE WOULD DO ANYTHING FOR THAT HILLARY CANKER ODOR COMING FOR SOUTH OF THE BELT LINE. I CAN’T EVEN IMAGINE THE LEVEL OF CHEESE MOLD THAT’S INSIDE THAT THING.!!!

  17. I’ve never heard of a female accuser going to jail for false allegations, Roy Moore could sue them but collecting would be a problem if they didn’t have it. So they get some fame at the cost of another’s reputation and he will always be branded by some.!!!!!

  18. So that’s the only excuse you can come up with for this child sex abuser? One of his victims may have an ulterior motive in coming forward? Pathetic. You side with the Russians and you side with the pervert. Yeah, that’s patriotic, all right. Uh-huh. Right.

  19. Alabanians, please open ur eyes to these lies …….we must put Moore in office

  20. mrpoohead = shite for brains..

  21. Women are some of the most petty, spiteful, vengeful beings on the planet. I don’t find it difficult to believe someone of her caliber would lie, at all. Where were they until he decided to run and the polls declared him in the lead? Coincidence? I think not, revenge is much more likely in this case. The truth will come out. Btw, I am a woman.

  22. IF we were to follow the money train…..Dot dot dot to WAPO/Soros?Pelosi and KOMRADS ….BUT it seems to BACKFIRE!!!!

  23. At 85 I lam maxed out for Roy! However, his time has come as the opponent shot himself in the foot!

    Accepting fake-news is both stupid and evil! Stupid because it can’t withststand what used to be a journalistic standard taught in 1920 to my father at the Toledo Blade- he knew!

    Nowadays, truth is important only if it can be traced in a way that exposes those who repeat the lies as being both dishonest and stupid. Why do they do it? First, many are told to go make it up! Second, others volunteer to get a chance to look important.

    Bringing up an obvious lie that is wrongly attributed to a high school year book with a fake signature plus a secretary’s initials is about as dumb as forgery gets! Its also very stupid to not realize that the initials had to represent an action in Court years or decades later.

    Roy needs no more help! His opponent showed himself to be ineligible for wanting to accept the obvious fake out of sheer stupidity, if nothing else!

    So, go Roy go!

    Regards,

    Richard R. Tryon II of Frankfort, MI

  24. Marion E McKenzie

    The good people of Alabama are smart enough to see through this Liberal Bull-Shit…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*