Gabbard Chooses Trump Over Harris; Raises Alarming Peace and Liberty Issues

Tulsi Gabbard endorses Donald Trump over Kamala Harris, citing peace and liberties concerns.

At a Glance

Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic presidential candidate, endorses Donald Trump for President in 2024.
Gabbard criticizes Kamala Harris’s policies on foreign affairs and human rights.
Endorsement based on Gabbard’s commitment to non-interventionist foreign policy and civil liberties.
Endorsement signifies a notable shift as Gabbard had previously endorsed Biden in 2020.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Endorsement of Trump

Tulsi Gabbard, former congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate, has endorsed Donald Trump over Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election. Citing concerns over peace and individual liberties, Gabbard revealed her support for Trump, arguing that his policies better align with her non-interventionist foreign policy stance and advocacy for civil liberties. Gabbard’s decision marks a significant political shift, particularly as she previously endorsed Joe Biden in 2020.

Gabbard pinpointed several reasons for her endorsement of Trump, notably criticizing Harris for her policies on foreign affairs and human rights. She expressed concern that Harris’s stance could threaten international peace and personal freedoms. Gabbard’s endorsement is also rooted in her combat experience and commitment to non-interventionism, suggesting that Trump better embodies the qualities of a commander-in-chief who values diplomacy and sees war as a last resort.

Tulsi Gabbard shares why she endorsed Trump over Kamala Harris: 'Cherish peace and freedom' https://t.co/fFT138h5T1

— Fox News (@FoxNews) August 27, 2024

Criticism of Kamala Harris

Gabbard has not shied away from criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of incompetence on critical issues, including the chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal. She questions Harris’s capability to serve as commander-in-chief and highlighted the lack of communication with the families of service members killed during the withdrawal.

“There was a triple amputee there today [at Arlington] to honor the loss of his brothers and sisters. Has she called them to apologize? To apologize for the decision that they made that resulted in this disastrous withdrawal? And an explosion and an attack that took these 13 service members’ lives that was completely preventable? Kamala Harris is completely unfit to serve as our commander-in-chief,” Gabbard told guest host Judge Jeanine Pirro.

Gabbard’s criticisms are not just limited to specific incidents. She broadly regards Harris’s policies as detrimental to the nation’s interests. Gabbard argues that under the current administration, the U.S. is closer to the brink of nuclear war and facing multiple conflicts on several fronts.

Historical Context and Support for Trump

Gabbard’s endorsement signifies a marked departure from her initial support for the Democratic Party. After endorsing Joe Biden in the 2020 elections, she became an independent in 2022, openly criticizing the Democratic Party’s direction. Her current stance underscores a belief that Trump’s presidency better aligns with her vision for peace and personal freedoms.

“I endorsed President Trump today because he has those qualities, and he’s proven that he is that commander-in-chief. Kamala Harris has proven she is not. We are closer to the brink of nuclear war now than ever before, closer to World War III because of Harris and Biden and their policies.” – Tulsi Gabbard

Gabbard’s foreign policy views are shaped by her experiences as an Iraq War veteran, where she saw first-hand the cost of interventionist policies. She praised Trump’s willingness to meet with adversaries and allies in the pursuit of peace, contrasting this approach with Harris’s more aggressive stance on international issues.

“This administration has us facing multiple wars on multiple fronts in regions around the world and closer to the brink of nuclear war than we ever have been before,” said Gabbard. “This is one of the main reasons why I’m committed to doing all that I can to send President Trump back to the White House, where he can once again serve us as our commander-in-chief. Because I am confident that his first task will be to do the work to walk us back from the brink of war.”