Either Way, the Biggest Scandal in Political History

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes dropped a bombshell on Wednesday, telling reporters that he had new information that Donald Trump’s associates were, indeed, under surveillance during the presidential transition period.

Nunes said that this collected surveillance was “incidental” – meaning that intelligence agencies were conducting lawful surveillance of foreign targets and only accidentally picked up Trump’s associates. But nonetheless, it appeared to go a long way towards proving that President Trump was right all along: Trump Tower was “wiretapped.”

Nunes’s announcement came two days after FBI Director James Comey testified, with clarity, that Trump’s tweets accusing President Obama of having Trump Tower under surveillance were not true. On Friday, some White House officials were claiming that information from the NSA would ultimately prove that Trump was telling the truth all along.

The problem, of course, is not that this incidental collection happened – although that, too, may be a problem when all of this comes out in the wash. But for now, the problem is what the Obama intelligence community did with those names. If they had remained classified and under wraps, that’s one thing. But instead, as Nunes said and as other media reports have confirmed, the Obama administration spread these names far and wide throughout both the government and, eventually, throughout the media.

It bears repeating once more that no one has yet produced ANY evidence proving that Donald Trump worked with the Russians in his campaign for president. Did a few of his associates do something they weren’t supposed to do? That remains to be seen. Just as likely, however, is that the Obama holdovers and the Democrats have reverse-engineered this entire investigation for the purpose of sabotaging Trump’s presidency.

Meaning: They know that whatever meetings Trump’s associates had with Russian officials were innocuous in nature, unrelated to the campaign, or, in any case, not for the purpose of conducting a treasonous coup against American democracy. But in the meantime, they have just enough suspicious-looking material to slowly “drip, drip, drip” a story that appears to corroborate this wild conspiracy theory.

Either way, we’re in the middle of one of the greatest political scandals in U.S. history. Either Trump and Putin successfully “took over” the U.S. government or Democrats are playing an unthinkable hoax on the American people while trying to dismantle a legitimate administration. However this turns out, it will not be pretty.

About Admin

425 comments

  1. And Whoopi Goldberg says Trump should apologize to Obama, well Mouthy Iceberg how about Obama apologize to Trump and America? Waits no response from princess Running-mouth, Obama gets a free pass as usual even when proven wrong libs still lie deny and pot the blame on others

    • Obama planned WATERGATE??

      • Stupid, Nixon didn’t plan watergate either, just lied when he learned about it. Sorry, but as corrupt as tricky Dick was, bathhouse Barry puts him in the minor leagues of incompetence, ignorance and treason…Grab your teddy bear and get back under your (mommie’s) bed now….

        • Possibly you’re not old enough to remember (it WAS a LONG time ago), but NIXON WAS NEVER CONVICTED OF ANYTHING, not even a parking violation, and he WAS NOT IMPEACHED. The House Judiciary Committee (which would have had to bring impeachment charges) COULDN’T EVEN FIGURE OUT WHAT TO ACCUSE HIM OF.
          The Constitution says a president can ONLY be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and even the Democrats couldn’t quite swallow the idea that DESTROYING HIS OWN TAPES was a “high crime.” (The tapes were NOT government property, as they would be NOW. The taping system had been installed by Nixon’s predecessor, Democrat Lyndon Johnson, who told Nixon he might find it useful to have “records” of what he said so the media (!!!) couldn’t lie about it. Johnson GAVE the system to Nixon as a GIFT, there being NO OFFICIAL SYSTEM in existence.)
          And THAT is all Nixon actually DID that was even borderline illegal. HE OWNED THE TAPES, and there’s no law anywhere that says a person can’t destroy something that they, personally, OWN. (Think of all the videotapes you probably dumped in a recycling bin when you upgraded to DVDs!) No matter how much someone else would LIKE to see it — they don’t have a RIGHT to see it unless it’s an official record (which it wasn’t, unlike, for instance, HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS — which SHE also destroyed, AND THAT WAS against the law!)

          True, if you’re hair-splitting, Nixon also failed to disclose what (VERY LITTLE) he knew about the Watergate “break-in”. A group of men who DID NOT WORK FOR NIXON, but for the very large “Committee to Reelect the President” (also known as CREEP) broke into the Democrat National Committee offices to bug the place; they were caught and their “crime” was treated as breaking and entering, which is all it was. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT NIXON KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS ESCAPADE BEFORE IT HAPPENED. I personally find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe he did: Whatever else he was or wasn’t, Nixon was a VERY shrewd politician. The Dems were in TOTAL disarray that year; their anticipated nominee, Bobby Kennedy (JFK’s brother) was their EXPECTED nominee, but then he was shot and killed in June 1968, by — ironically — a MUSLIM who hated America. That left the Dems with NO CANDIDATE, or anyway no GOOD candidate. After a scuffle that made the Clinton-Sanders fight look TAME, Sen. George McGovern, a Sanders-type far-left outsider was nominated WITH ALMOST ZERO SUPPORT FROM THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE. They didn’t trust McGovern at all, and HE didn’t like THEM. McGovern ran his OWN campaign, well outside the DNC structure. (Think what 2016 might have been like if SANDERS had won the Dem nomination and the DNC had done LITTLE OR NOTHING to help him win.) In short, there is NO reason to think that the DNC would have HAD any important campaign documents (or telephone conversations with the McGovern team). NIXON would have KNOWN that, even if the idiot burglars didn’t. If Nixon had wanted to order a burglary, it would have been of the McGOVERN headquarters, not the DNC.

          Just wanted to set the record straight. MAYBE Nixon was a sleazebag, or maybe he was INNOCENT but didn’t want to tie his own life, his family’s, or the Nation’s in knots for YEARS ON END trying to prove it.

          • Didn’t he ACCEPT a pardon?
            Why was it issued?

          • greenlantern1 — Yes, AFTER he’d resigned, President Ford OFFERED him a pardon (which he had NOT REQUESTED) IN CASE some future (liberal Democrat) administration might dig up some accusations based on questions already answered AND NOT indicating any illegal actions. Nixon didn’t want the rest of his life (and his family’s) dogged by people bringing up the same accusations, however often dismissed, over and over again. (You have to understand that the political Left’s HATRED for Richard Nixon was VISCERAL — MUCH worse than the hatred by their descendants for Donald Trump, bad as that is! They LOATHED Nixon and would have gone to ANY lengths to bring him down.) So Nixon accepted the pardon, which he TECHNICALLY DID NOT NEED, as by that time NOBODY was pursuing any charges.

    • To incriminate Obama would have to mean racism!
      Naturally! All he ever did was play the race card!

      • Rene Widzicki. Yeah he played the race card so much the damn thing turned to dust lol. Hypocrite is the biggest racist of all Americans should play the race card on him it’s fair

      • Since, he is if his sainted father is telling the truth, he is 36 % arab …14 % Black and a whole 50% White , the populace can take their choice and like or dislike any of the 3 types of classification. Caucasian, Negroid ( Black ), or Semitic.
        The race card lost its value from over use. It was hauled out at the first symptom of
        disagreement. When it’s flipped out today, it’s the signal to get up and leave the area of the person who is doing it. Only area a demented masochist would stay to listen.

        • taliesin319 — It’s almost impossible to arrive at a genetic profile for ANYONE that would involve those specific percentages. Everybody has 2 parents (well, let’s leave aside those people conceived by surrogates), so anyone’s genetic makeup is 50% from Mom and 50% from Dad. Each of us have 4 Grandparents, so we have 25% from EACH of them. Great-grandparents, 8 per person = 12.5% from each. Great-Great grandparents: 16 per person = 6.25% from each. And so on.

          Arriving at any kind of profile involving 14% or 36%…well, the ONLY way to do that is to count back about 100 generations — and NOT EVEN ROYALTY CAN DO THAT — and then pick and choose andestors to make the percentages come out as you want them.

      • I would have voted for Herman Cain. There was no racism. He was a brilliant businessman and not a politician. He, like Pres. Trump knew how to make money work. He could have easily won and Obama knew that, so guess what he did!? He tried to spew sex scandals that never happened against Herman Cain. Although there was NEVER any truth to that, Herman Cain backed out of the race so he didn’t have to put his wife through all of that, even if it wasn’t true. Obama’s only real Republican competitor was Herman Cain, who happened to be black. I had listened to Mr. Cain as a guest or fill-in for a lot of the major talk-show radio shows. He was a man of integrity. Obama was working on the fact that he would be the first black American President and Herman Cain could have been a major obstacle. Obama acted on what he does best, unfairly attacking the opponent. The race card was pulled by Obama more times than I can remember by anyone. Everything was so one-sided. Zaevion Dobson murder in Knoxville, TN (which is where I live) was definitely a tragedy and he was definately a hero protecting his friends with his body. Obama’s outrage of the black teenager’s death was admiral, except he left out the fact that Zaevion was killed by two black gang members. Obama forgot to tell the rest of the story. We had a white teenage couple, Shannon Christian and Christian Newsom that were kidnapped, tortured and murdered by 3 male black thugs and one female black thug. The couple was tortured, raped and sodomized. Christian, after being totured, was set on fire at railroad tracks and left there to die. Shannon was gang raped and tortured. She was then put in a garbage bag and put in a trashcan while she was still alive. She suffocated. I don’t believe this tragedy was widely televised. Read about the further tragedy that their poor families had to go through because of a corrupt judge. None of these crimes committed by blacks on whites were ever by noted by Obama, nor widely televised. I think Obama was more of a racist than the racists that he accused. I am the wife of Bob Morton.

        • Bob Morton Typical Scumbama lie cheat frame and slander 24/7 and gets away with it. Boy I would love to see the POS sued for slander and more + jail

    • I think Whoopi Goldberg should apologize to ALL of us for occupying otherwise USEFUL SPACE on this PLANET. Among ALL the brainless twits in show biz, Whoopi has ALWAYS stood out as one of the MOST OBNOXIOUS. WHY ON EARTH does ANYONE, even black women, pay ANY attention to what she says or does?

      • RightWriter you nailed it she damn sure should but won’t in that garbage heap she calls a brain we’re all wrong she’s right. She’s so obnoxious and annoying even Satan himself needs a pain killer lol

      • She needs a lobotomy to drain the stupid out oh wait that’d flood the world and drown us all lol

  2. When Chuckie Schumer starts his filibuster of the Judge Gorsuch confirmation I suggest that he begin by reading the entire constitution to the democratic dimwits that choose to attend. I think they all need to know what is actually in it!

    • Mr. Manfredgensenden

      Heh…the DimDums would probably stop him and say we have to pass that before we hear what’s in it…

      • MMMMM Did I hear that Line before from the AIR HEAD From SF???

        • Yeah, that was on the — count ’em! — 112th REVISION of the so-called “Affordable Care Act” — no WONDER nobody knew at that point what the bill said! Democrats are willing to march like lemmings to the sea in support of whatever their leaders (and of course President) tell ’em to support. Republicans actually READ the bills and sometimes (like today) refuse to go alone, even when the President’s (and their own) WHOLE PROGRAM is riding on it.
          No wonder the Dems are better at getting THEIR programs approved than WE are with our own. We torpedo our own ships if they’re not EXACTLY the way we want ’em.

          • Well another way to look at it is that the (D) Anarchists will GOOSE Step together even though the Program they Forced on the People is Flaming out , while the FEW Repubs stand on their campaign Promises. However we do have a DISFUNCTIONAL CONGRESS where HOT air is Expanded to do NOTHING…………..May be it is time to FLUSH them ALL OUT!

          • Michael Dennewitz

            Well…. I’ve always said, “FLUSH THE TOILET – GET RID OF THE CORRUPT SHIT'”??

          • BEEN SAYING the SAME Glad we are on the same SIDE!

          • Progressive Republican

            Except someone clearly recently moved the sewer pipe to empty into the WH.

          • Progressive Republican

            Anarchists goosestepping? Are they in step?

          • There’s not a single anarchist in the U.S. Congress, in either the House OR Senate. I don’t know where The Redhawk GETS such nonsense.
            But I CAN say it’s the DEMOCRATS, not Republicans, who goosestep — yeah, in lockstep — off the cliff by supporting ANYTHING their “leaders” tell ’em to. They don’t even READ the bills until after they’ve PASSED them, according to no less an authority than then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D). Republicans READ and DEBATE bills BEFORE voting on them, and that sometimes results in disagreement. REPUBLICANS THINK FOR OURSELVES, unlike the opposition.

          • Progressive Republican

            Indeed, you can say that.

            Just not accurately. The sixteen months of wrangling on the Republican-authored Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the lack of debate on the Republican Insurance Plan (RIP) is evidence of that.

          • Progressive Republican – Evidence of WHAT? That we wrangle about the details of legislation? That’s how legislation is SUPPOSED to be written, with people debating the fine points & eventually reaching an agreement. In a republic, at least, it’s NOT SUPPOSED to be handed down from some
            Pelosi-occupied Mount Olympus (Mount Nancy?) for the peasants (ordinary House members) to ratify without even READING.
            A long time ago a great statesman (not American) said, “There are two things NOBODY should EVER watch being made: SAUSAGES and LEGISLATION.” He had a pretty good point.

          • Me thinks Preg Rep is a MOLE of the CLOWN

          • Progressive Republican

            I’m no mole of your latest god der Schmuckenführer.

          • Why? why not sincere in beliefs? Everyone is free to join the conversations……One does not learn anything when everyone “sings the same song”

          • Of course this is how it should be done….But when Congressional “leaders” make statements such as; we will do nothing to help this president, “our goal is to make him a one-term President.” it appears that the die has been cast, if that President happens to be a Black man. {partisan politics is incompatible in a democracy,,,,if it signals war in a deliberative body) The Right’s loss this past week was self-inflicted….it was hastily, poorly written and was driven by ideology, rather than be a productive attempt to design improvements. Ryan did not listen to what people were saying.to his Republican colleagues in theirTown Halls President Obama said…”mend it, don’t end it”. The Right wingers were too greedy for a win…and they blew it. (Social Security Act has been amended about 47 times since first passed in 1935.) .

          • The only way we can ever have low cost healthcare is by letting the government run it. Just like medicare. You pay a small tax from you paycheck and everyone is covered. Non of the country’s that give healthcare to their ppl force them to buy insurance. Why give the insurance co billions in profit when that money could go into a government fund. The ppl in Australia pay next to nothing for healthcare less than what one month of insurance cost here for a whole year of coverage there

          • You are absolutely correct. President Obama made this absolutely clear in the begining that this was his desire…but he was forced to aim lower, after having been assured by Mitch Mc that HIS goal was (his words), to insure that Obama “would have a one term Presidency”. Then he set out to prove this , not by bipartisan cooperation but by sabatoging many efforts by Obama. So, this imperfect law was the best that was acomplished. Remember Obama’s statement “mend it don’t end it.” What could be done is gradually modify, as was done with Medicare laws, a few steps at a tims.

          • That “small tax” will seem BIG to the people who can afford it least, and EVERY YEAR IT WILL GET BIGGER until even people like YOU won’t be able to afford it. AND every year it will COVER less and less, leaving everyone — rich or poor — to pay MORE out of their own pockets. AND it won’t cover everything anyway. AND the quality of care will decline. . Canada keeps its public medical system going because THEY HAVE A SAFETY VALVE: It ‘s Called the United States of America. When CANADIANS are told they will have to WAIT SIX MONTHS for “nonessential” surgery (and I don’t mean facelifts: I mean BACK SURGERY or even HEART surgery), THEY GET ON A PLANE AND FLY TO BOSTON OR MINNEAPOLIS, which have a surfeit of EXCELLENT hospitals and doctors, and have it done there — even if they have to pay out of pocket for it. Better than WAITING and MAYBE DYING.
            The Brits ESCAPE their “national health service” (which has absolutely LOUSY care in hospitals that haven’t been modernized since the 1950s!) because their NHS allows them to use private doctors (NOT under the NHS), and there are private clinics that don’t participate in the scandalously decrepit NHS system. THEY EVEN HAVE PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE NOW, which eveyrone who can scrape together the fees buys into because the NHS is SO BAD.

          • “Just like Medicare”???? Are you ON Medicare???? I have been for TEN YEARS (well, next month it’ll be 10 years) and I HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO FIND A DOCTOR WHO WOULD ACCEPT IT and who also speaks English well enough to communicate with the patient (me) or understand what the patient (me, again) is saying. I don’t mind dealing with staff in the supermarket who don’t speak good English, but when my HEALTH is at risk I WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE DOCTOR and BE REASONABLY CERTAIN THE DOCTOR UNDERSTANDS ME. (I used to limp along with my less than perfect Spanish, but nowadays they don’t speak SPANISH, either — mostly URDU or HINDI.) Even if they’re good doctors, I WANT TO BE ABLE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THEM, and that is IMPOSSIBLE. So please don’t tell me you’re going to provide care “just like Medicare.” I will be lucky to LIVE THROUGH IT.

          • I am on Medicaid and i know how hard it is to find a good doctor. Trump wants to cut Medicaid for the ones that can work. I am 60 and disabled i don’t know how it will effect me. My so called doctor will not even give me pain meds. I have met 2 other ppl with my same disability that both get pain meds.

          • Obviously I can’t diagnose, much less treat you, on a chat board, but my guess is if you’re already on the rolls as “disabled” cutting Medicare for THOSE WHO CAN WORK wouldn’t have any effect on you at all. (I’m assuming you’re not cheating in claiming disability! 🙂 ) Otherwise, I don’t know what to tell you — it seems that where one IS and who is one’s DOCTOR has more impact on what services and/or medication one gets than any other factor. That’s a shame, but I’m not sure how President Trump or ANYONE else could FIX it. I suspect it’s a hazard of government funded medical care, of any sort. 🙁

          • Payroll deduction is not forced payment​? It is still a Ponzi scheme! Just like Social Security is! Yes I paid in my whole working life from about 14 to 65 and now I’m on disability at a third of my last salary. COLA- that is a joke because they changed the market basket.l!

          • OK, but let’s get one thing straight: NOBODY in the so-called “Freedom Caucus” — group of House members who took the “we will not compromise” stand on the ACHA and made it impossible for the TRUMP-RYAN bill to pas — is a “Congressional LEADER.” They’re a group of about 40 VERY junior members who have NOTHING to do with leadership because they ARE so junior (and now probably never WILL be leaders, because MOST of them will be DEFEATED in 2018). (The British call people like them in Parliament “BACK BENCHERS,” because they’re not ALLOWED to sit up front on the “leadership benches.”) WE aren’t THAT fussy, but they’re NOT and NEVER WILL BE LEADERS.

            The ACHA bill was NOT “hastily” or “poorly” written. It was a carefully crafted piece of work that resulted from taking the best parts of three or four bills THAT HAD PREVIOUSLY PASSED THE HOUSE. The difference THIS year was that the “Freedom Caucus” — many new to the House with ZERO idea of how things work in Congress — dug their heels in and REFUSED to compromise on ANYTHING; in fact, every time Speaker Ryan conceded to ONE of their demands, they MADE ANOTHER. (It’s known in football as “moving the goalposts”: it’s NOT ALLOWED in football and ALWAYS SELF-DEFEATING in politics.

            DO NOT BLAME PAUL RYAN. HE was not greedy/ H wase

          • Well, this is a “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” type argument. You say Congressional “leaders” — by which you obviously mean Republican leaders — refused to cooperate with the Obama team. I would say the Republican leaders WENT to the Obama team with a whole package of ideas for health insurance/health care reform, some of which had originally been DEMOCRATS’ ideas, and suggested some of them MIGHT IMPROVE Obamacare. Pelosi and Harry Reid — then the Democrat leader in the Senate — told them to GET LOST. And when the Republicans tried to Obama or HIS staff, Obama said (this is a quote): “I won the election! I don’t need to talk to you!”
            It’s a little hard to “work together” when someone starts out THAT WAY.
            As for the statement that we were resolved to make
            Obama a one-term president, THAT is something the out-of-power political party says in the first term of ANY president. It’s political rhetoric. Right now some Democrat leader is saying the EXACT SAME THING to or about
            President Trump — in fact, they’ve been threatening to IMPEACH him — barely TWO MONTHS into his first term, when there are ZERO grounds to even CONSIDER beginning an impeachment process. If someone is being EXCESSIVELY PARTISAN, I have to point MY fingers at the DEMOCRATS (although there IS, of course, partisanship on both sides. THAT is part of politics in a representative democracy or republic. It’s a nuisance, but get rid of it and what you have is TYRANNY.).

          • Progressive Republican

            Yes, that’s how it should be done. The latest Republican Insurance Plan was marked by an extreme lack of wrangling about details.

            So much for your snowflakey whine about being handed down from Mt. Olympus. That’s precisely what the latest batch of traitors batch in power tried and they couldn’t even get all the traitors on the same page; mostly because it didn’t screw over enough poor people.

          • How do you define “traitor”?

          • Progressive Republican

            Those who work to undermine a nation and its citizenry.

            The dictionary says, “a person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.”, but today’s GOP has plainly shown a lack of principles.

          • But that is OK since the American People Spoke LOUD and CLEAR in 2010-12-14-16 that the ODUMBOCARE is a FREAKEN DISASTER ,,. predicted by Insurance Companies, Doctors, hospitals or anyone with a functioning brain that it’ll IMPLODE in Flames EARLY 2018 and the PROGRESSIVE ANARCHISTS of (D) Party OWNS IT by Having VOTED unanimously for it…..Well Draw your Pathetic Conclusion … SCHUMEE da CLOWN , AIR HEAD and their SLEAZE BAGS will KNEEL AND BEG Trump for a GOP solution….

          • Stay tuned hawk…most Americans are learning about how your guy was elected. Your votes were made in anger, having been manipulated into that state by those who would limit American power in the world. You’ve been played.

          • Get Ready for the FINAL CHAPER of the (D) Nazi party in 2018….Unpchuck/Pelosi/Obama/Soros will get that DONE!

          • Progressive Republican

            The people did indeed speak loudly and clearly when they selected anyone but your latest god der Schmuckenführer to be POTUS.

            The GOP-authored-PPACA was everything they wished; otherwise it would never have gotten onto the floor for a vote. The fact that they collectively turned their backs goosestepping on their own creation only shows them as the craven snowflakes they are.

            The GOP’s solution to their own idea seems to be “If you get sick, die. Quickly.”

          • That’s the FIRST time anyone has EVER called me “snowflakey” or any of the terms that preceded it and meant the same thing! I’m usually the toughest one in the room. And I am NOT happy with the outcome on the ACHA vote. Not at all.

            The GOP-authored PPACA might have been everything MOST of the House members wished; I don’t think it WAS that good, but I’ll let that go. But YOU seem CLUELESS about the fact that we have a DIFFERENT MEMBERSHIP in the House than we had when the PPACA was under consideration. DIFFERENT MEMBERS have DIFFERENT IDEAS, and have to be heard.

            In THIS Congress we have MORE HARD-LINE CONSERVATIVES who wanted to do all three parts of the repeal/replace process at ONCE and simply wouldn’t accept that it couldn’t be DONE that way. (It takes newbies awhile to learn what CAN and CAN’T be done in Congress — which is perhaps the BEST argument AGAINST TERM LIMITS.)

            In any case, the “Freedom Caucus,” a bloc of about 40 SOLID conservatives, many of them first elected last year, simply refused to budge. I THINK THEY WERE STUPID AND I HAVE CONTACTED EVERY ONE OF THEM TO TELL THEM SO. (I also think it will get most of them DEFEATED next year, and I told them THAT, too!) Buti they would NOT vote for the American Health Care Act, and without them, it wouldn’t have passed.

            There is also another “player” in the game this year who wasn’t here when the PPACA passed. He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, whether YOU like him or not — the “PEOPLE” who you THINK “spoke loudly and clearly” on the PPACA DID elect him, even if (as I suspect) it was without YOUR vote. (I’m not particularly a Trump fan, but I think calling him as fascist is ABSURD and OFFENSIVE.)

            Anyway, there’s a funny thing about HAVING a president of YOUR OWN PARTY: HE HAS TO BE WILLING TO SIGN THE BILLS THE CONGRESS PASSES, or they’re useless. Got that?

            THAT is the way Congress and the executive branch work. It’s messy (as I said before, it’s like making sausage — unpleasant to examine too closely) and the result is NOT always what you want, even when your party is in nominal control.

            The “if you get sick, die quickly line” identifies you absolutely NOT as a “Progressive Republican” but as a spear-carrier for NANCY PELOSI and her GANG OF LEFT-WING LUNATICS. I was offended by your description of President Trump as a fascist, and I’m AT LEAST as MUCH offended by your PRETENDING to be a “progressive” Republican when you’re obviously a STICK-IN-THE-MUD DEMOCRAT. That makes you a LIAR and a NAME-CALLER, both. The hell with you: I don’t have time to waste with either.

          • well so the oDUMBOCARE ( about to EXPLODE) seem to have Broken just about Every Obama ” period” Promise….

          • There’s NO SUCH THING as a “progressive anarchist.” It’s like saying a “conservative COMMUNIST.” Why don’t you get it thru your head: AN ANARCHIST BELIEVES IN NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL. It’s a physical impossibility to be THAT and also a “progressive,” as the “Progressives” BEGAN the trend to more powerful central governments over a CENTURY AGO.

            You ARE right, though, that Obamacare will implode in early 2018. The trouble is, NOW REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO GET SOME OF THE BLAME when it does, because WE had an opportunity to KILL it and didn’t do the job. It remains to be seen if people will make the distinction that the so-called “FREEDOM CAUCUS” killed the AHCA, or will blame ALL Republicans, including the President. Either way, we MAY well lose control of the House, and President Trump COULD be a one-termer, as “repeal/replace” Obamacare was HIS chief promise.

          • Progressive/Conservative = OXYMORON

          • Progressive Republican

            Didn’t used to be.

            At least not until RINOs took over the party.

          • Yes! The Writer who is right should have stopped after the second sentence.

          • OH yes Look at Adam SCHIFF who by being the TYPICAL GOOSE STEPPING SLEAZE BAG should be the TITULAR HEAD of the HEADLESS (D) Anarchy Party

          • Based on what evidence? You’ve got to backup what you say, explain what you really mean, give a source or two. Brainless attacks are usually ignored by reasonable people, regardless of their ideology.

          • charles johnston

            ‘Bout as brainless as your posts. Not and original idea resides in that skull, does it? But I’m sure your head can be navigated with ease, being hampered by no weight of brains. For a troll, you’re marginal at best.

          • isn’t it INTERSTING that when AIR Heads post the ideas sent to them ” So many words are posted while saying absolutely NoTHING???” as had been said about BIDEN Verbose Speeches…

          • charles johnston

            Yep. I always liked listening to Biden for some sadistic reason. I was always amazed he could still talk with both feet in his mouth. As for the airheads, I know I souldn’t feed the trolls, but sometimes they are so rediculous I can’t resist- personal flaw I guess- anyway, be well, Hawk.

          • It seems to me that he left many Pretenders to his “GAS BAG” title in the (D) Clowns Senate, on the House side Adam Schiff is getting all lined up for “NOTHING SAID” clown of the Year .. Pelosi has already WON AIR Head title for 2017

          • charles johnston

            Both are the best ads for term limits ever.

          • BULLS EYE !!!!

          • Schiff the DOCHE BAG has NO evidence that Russia had ANY EFFECT on the US election….. Yet while Ignoring the Possible acts of Treason by HILLERY Clinton or that Podesta might have committed Illegal acts and Hillery was the Reason she lost….Continues to WHINE about RUSSIA How about Whining about CIA, DHS etc Releasing names of US citizen that had been “TAPPED” against the LAWS???

            Assange released E mails of Hillary and Podesta….THEIR FAULT he was getting to them and the DNC,,,You Ignore the SUBJECT of those E- mails and the Consequences as do the (D) Anarchy party .. …. as the GUILT of any MOLE releasing Trump tower ” spying” names ….(ILLEGAL ACT).

          • Progressive Republican

            Um, sure…

          • Hey just a thought
            Progressive/Republican=OXYMORON
            Progressive/NAZI= Reality

          • Progressive Republican

            Clearly, you’ve overtaxed your obviously meager intellectual capabilities.

            Particularly amusing as it’s the GOP that most closely mimics Nazis: hence my avatar.

          • YES you sound like FREAK Anarchist in the Category of FREAKS of the (D) Anarchy party Uninformed in History by Not knowing Much… Let’s start with the “RUSSIA RUSSIA ” being blamed for Losing the 2016 Elections which ‘Progressive /Anarchists” managed to do all by themselves while Ignoring that By Obama interfering with Israel and Montenegro Elections might have given REASONS for Russia to COPY …Carry on FREAK

          • “FEW” Republicans stand on their campaign promises? The whole problem today was caused because ALL the Republicans — and they ARE a majority in the House, 237 R (that’s NOT “few”) to 193 D with 5 vacancies caused by President Trump appointing Republicans to his Cabinet; those vacancies will be filled by Republicans, no question about it.
            Or did you mean only a “few” stand on their campaign promises? If THAT were so, the Ryan bill, supported by President Trump, would have passed by a vote of something like 237 to 193. The only reason it didn’t is that REPUBLICANS CAN’T BE BLINDFOLDED AND LED INTO SUPPORTING A BILL, even the President’s bill. WE ACTUALLY READ & DEBATE BILLS before voting on them, and we reserve the right to vote NO when WE don’t like a bill, even if the President does. REPUBLICANS don’t march in lockstep over a cliff on ANYBODY’S orders.

          • Anarchists don’t goose-step. They usually don’t even WALK together.

          • but SLIDE together as SNAKES do

          • AMEN!! AMEN!!!

          • Since after 2010-11-14-16 they are still goose stepping like lemmings approaching the CLIFF….LET THEM ….Do their OWN FLUSH

          • The NO votes, by both party members, are due to the fact that Mr. Ryan’s creation would have been bad for people and good for insurance companys. Read up…and realize that Obama care has been successful in providing health care to millions more persons, and has saved millions of $$. This plan would have dropped several million persons. What it needs is improvement of some parts, and strengthen others. It has always been said that it wasn’t perfect and would require enhancementl However the calls for…. repeal were louder, thus here we are.
            Time for congress to work together to trengthen the existing plan. Social Security reqired modifications following it’s passage, for it to work as well as it does today.

            I wish there were fewer “us” and “them” dialogs here. The election is over…..this is not a football game.

          • This is not health care it is a tax!

          • Well, it’s a tax that (sort of) funds health INSURANCE, not “health care.” As I’m sure you realize, it has NOTHING to do with getting well; nothing to do with hospitals, or doctors, or nurses AT ALL. And you’re right; it IS a tax.

          • Funding health insurance has nothing to do with Health Care? You are kidding right?
            You have not heard the testimony of persons whose lives were positively affected, thanks to Obama care? The persons who are now able to have regular doctor/nurse Primary Care,which not only saves lives but saves $$$ thanks to early intervention? It is apparent that you have no experience with the delivering end of Health Care.

          • I never said funding health insurance has nothing to do with health care! I said that calling these bills (whether Obamacare, the original Hillarycare, or any version of the Republican bills) SHOULD BE CALLED “HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM,” because THE BILLS really don’t have anything to do with health CARE. We don’t try — NOBODY CAN — to legislate GOOD HEALTH; it comes (as I’m sure you, a nurse, know well) from lifestyle, diet, breaking bad habits, genetics, and a whole variety of causes. INSURANCE can help PAY FOR CARE, but it IS NOT, IN AND OF ITSELF, CARE. It’s a PAYMENT.

            I heard the testimony of the “witnesses” carefully selected by Nancy Pelosi and company to tell their stories. There are JUST as many stories — probably MORE — from people who LOST THEIR INSURANCE either because it wasn’t eligible for Obamacare, or because their employers (or themselves if they were self-insured) COULD NO LONGER AFFORD IT, or their doctors left their plans, or they couldn’t FIND a doctor who accepted Obamacare or Medicaid, or they were faced with USELESS INSURANCE PLANS because the deductibles suddenly rose from maybe $5,000 to $20,000 PER YEAR and they were NOWHERE NEAR SICK ENOUGH to run up bills like that. In fact, according to surveys MORE PEOPLE ARE DISAPPOINTED, FRUSTRATED, BANKRUPTED, or MADE ILL by the SHORTCOMINGS of Obamacare than those few HAND-PICKED WITNESSES who now have primary care.
            I SAID I had no medical experience, including with the “delivery end” of health care, but I DO know about PAYING for it. Having the best health insurance policy in the world is USELESS if you can’t afford to USE it because the deductible is much higher than your total medical expenses. It’s useless if you live in a state that HAS ONLY ONE OBAMACARE-CERTIFIED INSURANCE PROVIDER and then THAT provider GOES OUT OF BUSINESS or has to drop Obamacare to avoid BANKRUPTCY (which is happening in several states, and WILL happen in more).

            So don’t tell me the sob stories of your hand-picked witnesses, chosen by the Democrats JUST because their stories mesh with the Dems’ policies. You’re missing a much LARGER number of people HURT by Obamacare — which is probably why it is INCREASINGLY UNPOPULAR and people are DESPERATE to be RID OF IT.

          • Obama care was a tax for all the infidels – non Muslims. Muslims were exempted from the Obummer health care, Why? Go to google, type in page 107 Obama care. There you will find out.

          • Lets not forget Ryan’s new health care still gave free health care to over 10 million ppl here illegally. And could of kicked disabled ppl like me off unless i could find a job.

          • And there was an amendment ready for introduction on the House floor that would have eliminated that provision. It’s really hard to keep track on legislation as it develops (in House OR Senate), because there are SO MANY amendments nobody hears about until the last minute (well, OK, late in the process) and so many things can happen before they’re DONE. I agree with the guy who long ago said “THERE ARE TWO THINGS NOBODY SHOULD WATCH BEING MADE: SAUSAGES… AND LEGISLATION.” (Full disclosure: I’ve never watched anyone MAKING sausages, but I have a good imagination!)

          • Progressive Republican

            There is no specific exemption for Muslims.

            Try again.

          • There IS, however, a religious exemption for ANYONE who claims his/her religion prevents him or her from making use of various modern medical treatments or equipment. That would COVER Muslims as well as traditional Orthodox Jews, Christian Scientists, the Amish, and various others.

          • Progressive Republican

            And…?

          • Well, YOU and Mike Thomas were discussing the issue of whether or not Muslims were or could be exempt from the American Health Care Act. YOU said there was “no specific exemptions for Muslims,” which is true as of today, though the bill IS being rewritten. Anyway, I merely noted that there IS an exemption, or the possibility of an exemption, for various religious groups that have objections to one type of medical service or another. That’s all.

          • Progressive Republican

            Gotcha.

          • Elections are NEVER over. Once one is decided, the NEXT race begins.
            I’ve READ up, probably more than you ever could. You’re free to differ with me, of course, but PLEASE have the courtesy not to treat me like one of the semi-literates we encounter on sites like this.
            The “No votes” on Obamacare repeal were NOT from people who thought “it might have been bad for people and good for insurance companies.” The conservatives who opposed Ryan’s bill (which had President Trump’s endorsement) OPPOSED IT BECAUSE IT DIDN’T GO FAR ENOUGH. They wanted repeal & replace done TOGETHER, and RIGHT AWAY. Never mind the Senate rules that would have caused it to run into a brick wall when it got over there. They just wanted a MAJOR VICTORY and wanted it IMMEDIATELY, whether it survived or not.
            Obamacare has been successful ON PAPER, but hardly anyone who NEEDS insurance can AFFORD both the stiff PREMIUMS and SKY-HIGH DEDUCTIBLES. The average Obamacare buyer has had premiums go up by 100% and their deductible in some cases rise from $1,000 per year to $10,000 per year — for LESS CARE. The propaganda the Left (and of course Barack & Hillary) have put out (and which is widely repeated by the either gullible or deliberately untruthful media) is absolute nonsense.
            It’s too bad the Ryan bill DIDN’T pass today, because we could have been THROUGH with this process that much sooner. As it is, OBAMACARE WILL COMPLETELY COLLAPSE even before we can vote in an alternative. The premiums are INCREASING YET AGAIN, the deductibles will RISE ANOTHER 50%-100% LATER THIS YEAR, and — worse — COMPANIES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY ARE EITHER GOING BANKRUPT OR DROPPING THEIR OBAMACARE PLANS. So FEWER AND FEWER people will HAVE Obamacare, whatever else happens, those who do will pay even MORE for it; and there will be fewer insurance companies than EVER. Meaning the system will be MUCH harder to REBUILD from scratch when we finally DO get a new system in place.

          • I can second that. I was very dissapointed it was not voted on. I do believe however, that if Obama care does go down, this bill will be reintroduced, but will have more leverage as long as it is worked on in the meantime. I don’t agree tho that it will be harder at that time. The insurance companies are still up and running, and their businesses will grow back up quickly with the business coming back to them. It might mean even better rates at that time. What do you think?

          • I think you’re one of the most rational people I’ve encountered here of late. You’re right, although I do think it will be harder at a later date to pass the bill that was pulled yesterday. Some insurance companies will have collapsed, leaving their customers stranded and forcing them into Obamacare options, which as we know, stink. The transition to a new program (American Health Care Act or whatever: I suspect there WILL be some differences) will be rockier. But that doesn’t mean “impossible,” just a bit harder — the longer it take the harder it will get.

            You may well be right that, over some time, it may lead to better rates — I think it’s hard to know that, or to know it won’t work that way. But by the end of this year, I think (and devouty hope) we WILL have a new program up and running. I just hope it’s not too late — a LOT of people (who don’t know much about legislating) really believed we COULD do “repeal and replace” RIGHT AWAY. SOME of them are going to be ANGRY, even if we DO get it done this year.

          • Thank you. I appreciate that. I really like to discuss issues rationally. I don’t get to do that much. I really think Trump will be able to push tax reform tho. I also think it will improve his standing with democrats if they are logical. Infrastructure will be a big one for him too. By the time tax reform comes around and gets passed, I hope the health care bill will be improved dramatically and be able to go back to vote.

          • You seem to have a lot of facts. How do you know all this.?

          • Never mind that Most of the loudest people at the Town Hall meetings were liberal paid

            disruptor’s there for one reason. To be as loud as possible and create an idea that pushes the O’stupid health care plan, I for one am happy to watch as it melts down and as a result the ” people ” with their stories end up with NOTHING !!!

          • Other than this “shorty” your post is undeserving of a response.

          • LMBO, Ohh, I’m wounded deeply, NOT, Another leftwingnut

          • I’ve been through this before, that’s how.
            When Hillary was trying to impose single-payer health care (without TELLING US that was what she was trying to do) back in 1994, I handled the issue on Capitol Hill and I HAD to become an expert on the economics, so this time around I just had to apply what happened in 1994 (the bill CRASHED AND BURNED in a DEMOCRAT-controlled House of Representatives: even HER OWN PARTY (and that of her Hubby, of course) couldn’t swallow it without CHOKING. So when she came up with “Hillarycare Lite” — aka: Obamacare — I only had to update myself on the new and equally useless wrinkles. But no, my training is in ECONOMICS, not medicine. The issue really IS an economic issue.
            I WOULD point out that the Secretary of HHS, who will shepherd the NEW program through its Congressional hegira and run it when it takes effect, IS an M.D., and that the head of the Medicare/Medicaid Services division in HHS is also a doctor.

          • Tom Price is an Obstetrician. I doubt that he has done much practicing in the 12 years that he has served in Congress….. Also, unless his medical know -how includes having served in an administrative capacity ….one does not necessarily gain special skills to do his new job because he happens to have a medical degree. As for Seema Verna, her Masters degree in Public Health definitely qualifies her. Not a medical doctor,. in fact she is highly qualified for the position as Medicaid/Medicare director. Her track record includes having developed the Medicaid Expansion (under Obama Care) for the state of Indiana.
            And the states that DID use the AFC expansion incentive have had good results (Tennessee) Florida’s poor have difficulty applying for Medicaid because Governor Rick Scott refused that generous deal.

          • Last time I checked, an obstetrician needed to have a M.D. degree — and had studied all the branches of medicine before choosing a specialty. You say he’s an O.B. as if that made him a second-rate doctor: for the sake of all women everywhere who are having, or may someday have, babies, I certainly hope that’s NOT the case. It wasn’t back in the days when I was visiting an O.B. regularly. You’re right about Seema Verna: my mistake about her being an M.D. However, what she did in Indiana was ADAPT Obamacare to fit the state. That is EXACTLY what Republicans WANT EVERY STATE TO BE ABLE TO DO, even if they don’t have a Seema Verna to spearhead the effort. OBAMACARE MADE THAT EXCEPTIONALLY DIFFICULT.
            I think it’s WAY too soon to assess the “results,” good or bad, of using or not using the Medicaid expansion. Rick Scott didn’t just make an offhand decision; he had experts run the numbers and decided the deal wasn’t that good for Florida. (How come Democrats are always so happy to sign on to “statistics” that haven’t been proved — like the CBO projections (when CBO has been WRONG 9 times out of 10 in the past 30 years) — but when the numbers don’t prove their point they dismiss them out of hand? What makes you think Florida’s statisticians MUST be wrong?)

          • Thanks so much for your permission to respond to you. I have a simple question for you…..
            What is your experience regarding Health Care? Not the politics of it……..but the delivery of it.? I ask because one requires more than the political factors involved to appreciate values gained by providing health care for all Americans. Your rants do not contain this factor.
            I have not seen reference to those recent Town Hall meetings between congress members and their constituents here. They were quite compelling. House members, who intended voting for Ryan’s plan, were rendered speechless when hearing personal stories of those with actual experience of the benefits. of the AFC. There are more aspects to this….other than concern that for taxes.

          • it may have give millions of people with the lowest income health care but it has moved the middle class closer to low income. read RightWritera post premiums and deductibles are high now and are going up again another 117% again I am glad I have my healthcare he couldn’t touch unlike the millions he promised wouldn’t lose their current insurance or doctors and did. or that Americans would save 2,500 a year and none of us are remember nobody passed Obamacare it was an executive order. he couldn’t get it passed when he had total control. I hope the republicans can come together with a bill that can pass both the house and Senate but America will see that Obama care is not an affordable care act.

          • Thanks for the plug! 🙂

          • It makes no sense to cut a little fat and put the same healthcare bill right back in. I can give America a healthcare that will cost next to nothing. But the fat cats would lose a lot of weight. And never agree to it

          • What you must be suggesting is that we just turn everyone loose to buy his/her own insurance, and perhaps subsidize the purchase by people with low incomes. That WOULD work, for most, although calculating the subsidies (based on what? family size? age? gender? — whoops, THAT’d be UNCONSTITUTIONAL!) would be a nightmare because EVERYONE would be in the “I want MINE and I don’t give a hoot about YOURS!” mode. That’s really how we got into this mess in the first place: the GOVERNMENT (of course!) DECREED that everyone’s insurance has to cover EVERYTHING, no matter how unlikely it will ever be needed.

          • Edward puddy – First, the bill that was withdrawn on Friday did NOT just “cut a little fat” and then put the “same healthcare bill” right back in. It made SIGNIFICANT changes (too many to list here). AND ANYONE WHO FOLLOWED THE DEBATE understood this was just PART ONE of a THREE-PART REFORM: it HAD to be done that way because of the Senate’s arcane rules of procedure. By the time they’d gotten to
            Part Three, you’d have had ALL the bells and whistles you want, AND a less costly insurance scheme for EVERYONE.

            You keep saying you can “give America a healthcare (program) that will cost next to nothing,” but YOU NEVER DESCRIBE IT. I assure you, a LOT of VERY smart people with extensive experience in this field have been working on the Republican program for several YEARS and there IS no way to provide health insurance to EVERYONE for “next to nothing.” If there WERE, it would be on the table RIGHT NOW. The “fat cats” — I assume in this case you mean the insurance companies — don’t really have a say in this, and IF you really HAD a WORKABLE program at that low cost, the insurers wouldn’t get a WORD to say about it. Believe me, I KNOW. So I can only conclude that the experts have already studied your idea for a plan and it WON’T WORK, or maybe you’re just full of hot air.
            IF YOU HAVE THIS MAGIC PLAN, WRITE IT UP AND SEND IT TO
            Speaker Paul Ryan
            U.S. House of Representtives
            Washington, DC 20515
            It’s the LEAST you can do for your country, assuming your plan exists and would actually work — and if not, it’s just one more DUD the Speakers’ office will have to review.

    • Constitution?
      We have had ONE, convicted, attorney-general!
      Nixon’s first, John Mitchell!
      We have had ONE VP that made a plea bargain!
      Nixon’s first, Spiro Agnew!
      YOUR party is giving advice on LAW??

      • Clinton’s numerous times really you want to point to nixon

        • AWW go easy he can;t find his ;BURIED” head with a GPS even

        • Possibly you’re not old enough to remember (it WAS a LONG time ago), but NIXON WAS NEVER CONVICTED OF ANYTHING, not even a parking violation, and he WAS NOT IMPEACHED, mainly because the House Judiciary Committee (which would have had to bring impeachment charges) COULDN’T FIGURE OUT WHAT TO ACCUSE HIM OF.
          The Constitution says a president can ONLY be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and even the Democrats couldn’t quite swallow the idea that DESTROYING HIS OWN TAPES was a “high crime.” (The tapes were NOT government property, as they would be NOW, because there WAS NO LAW making them government property.)
          And THAT is all Nixon actually DID. HE OWNED THE TAPES, and there’s no law anywhere that says a person can’t destroy something that they, personally, OWN. No matter how much someone else would LIKE to see it — they don’t have a RIGHT to see it unless it’s an official record (which it wasn’t, unlike, for instance, HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS — which SHE also destroyed, AND THAT WAS against the law!)

          As to Agnew, he wasn’t much of a sleazebag, either. HE was a man of modest means who rose, somewhat surprisingly, to the Vice Presidency. In Maryland in those days, public officials made VERY small salaries, and it was UNDERSTOOD that they could fatten their pay packets by taking a little on the side — from developers and the like. EVERY Maryland official had his hand in the till. Agnew probably took a lot less (IF in fact he took ANYTHING AT ALL: that was never PROVED) than most.
          When the DEMOCRATS were looking for some way to get him out of the line of presidential succession (so they could go after Nixon, who was the real target), they hit on what MIGHT have been an illegal “gift” (aka; bribe), or might NOT. When Agnew was ACCUSED (not tried and DEFINITELY convicted), he could see his political career was over, and that he’d have to spend the next TEN YEARS defending himself in court — and he DIDN’T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY FOR IT. . So he pleaded “NOLO CONTENDERE,” which does NOT mean “guilty” — it means “NO CONTEST,” or “I will not defend myself against the charge.” HE NEVER
          PLEADED GUILTY and was NEVER CONVICTED of anything.
          Just wanted to set the record straight. MAYBE they were sleazebags, or maybe they were INNOCENT but didn’t want to tie their own lives or the Nation’s in knots for YEARS ON END to prove it.

        • That’s nonsense! Clinton WILL be convicted of abuses of power, and of lying under oath about Benghazi and also about her emails. (It takes time for the wheels of justice to start turning when a new Administration takes office).

          As to Nixon, Possibly you’re not old enough to remember (it WAS a LONG time ago), but NIXON was NEVER CONVICTED of ANYTHING (or even accused in court). and HE WAS NOT IMPEACHED, mainly because the House Judiciary Committee (which would have had to bring impeachment charges) COULDN’T FIGURE OUT WHAT TO ACCUSE HIM OF.
          The Constitution says a president can ONLY be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and even the Democrats couldn’t quite swallow the idea that DESTROYING HIS OWN TAPES was a “high crime.” (The tapes were NOT government property, as they would be NOW, because there WAS NO LAW making them government property — and the whole taping system had been INSTALLED BY NIXON’S PREDECESSOR, LYNDON JOHNSON, who GAVE it to Nixon as “a useful gift.”)
          So Nixon OWNED THE TAPES, and there’s no law anywhere that says a person can’t destroy something that they, personally, OWN. No matter how much someone else would LIKE to see it — they don’t have a RIGHT to see it unless it’s an official record (which it wasn’t, unlike, for instance, HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS — which SHE also destroyed, AND THAT WAS against the law!)

          • Not as long as the sleezeball Comey is in the Fumbling, Bumbling, (democrat controlled) Idiots.

          • Comey may be leaving sooner than he thinks. And anyway, at this point there’s no need for FBI Director to be involved; it’d be up to the ATTORNEY GENERAL (Jeff Sessions, Trump’s appointee) to take the next step. Believe me, HE is NOT a “fumbling, bumbling idiot,” and when his deputy AG is in place, HE won’t be, either.

      • In about a year, Holder and Lynch could be wearing striped ensembles….We’ll see how you feel then.

      • Your party founded the KKK

        • YOUR party CLAIMS to be the party of Lincoln!!
          Lincoln bolted, from the Republican party, to form the UNION party!
          He picked Andrew Johnson to be his VP.
          The RADICAL REPUBLICANS, their designation, impeached his VP.
          John Wilkes Booth was no lone assassin.
          Accomplices were hanged.
          During WW2, the KKK sided with Hitler.
          Americans sided with FDR.

          • More moronic spew from the total brainless idiot, the putrid green wienie and total asshat.

          • KKK was founded and supported by Democrats. Senator Robert Byrd was KKK wizard. Democrats passed Jim Crow Voting Laws. LBJ cajoled Democrats to pass 1964 Civil Rights Law in order to “control colored votes for the next 100 years”

          • You have that 100 percent right! Sadly, it mostly worked. 🙁
            Another little piece of history: LBJ’s “cajoling” southern Dems to vote for the Civil Rights Act in ’64 and Voting Rights Act in ’65 didn’t work too well. HE NEEDED REPUBLICAN VOTES TO PASS BOTH LAWS — most of the Southern Democrats did NOT cave in to his inducements. (Recent TV movie, “All The Way,” tells the story with surprisingly LITTLE exaggeration — doesn’t even make villains of the Republicans.

          • You are correct.

            1964 Civil Rights Act – Aye Votes

            Democrats. Republicans
            House 153 of 244 136 of 171
            63% 80%

            Senate 46 of 67 27 of 33
            69%. 82%

          • America1st — Thanks for the support and evidence of the actual votes!

          • greenlantern1 — Lincoln was one of the FOUNDERS of the Republican Party. He did NOT “bolt”; the “Union Party” WAS the Republican Party with another name used in 1864 to attract support of the “War Democrats” (Democrats, mostly Yankee, who supported the war) and “Border State Unionists,” who were likewise pro-Union but would not support a Republican. The party existed only on the ballots of about 8 states, and it vanished into thin air right after the 1864 election. Get your FACTS straight, you moron!

            Yeah, Andrew Johnson ran as Lincoln’s VP ON THE REPUBLICAN and UNION tickets. He had previously been a Democrat. He wouldn’t have been running on the Union ticket if he had been pro-Southern. The practice of bringing two (or more) political parties together to create a stronger ticket was common in the pre-Civil War and immediate post-Civil War era, before the parties had solidified (some would say “congealed”) into two major parties. Again, if you knew the actual FACTS you spout instead of just having a vague understanding, you could argue more effectively.

            The “radical Republicans” (yes. it was their designation: they were Republicans who felt strongly that the South and its sympathizers should be PUNISHED for the Civil War). LINCOLN (the REAL Republican) did NOT share that view.

            After Lincoln’s death, the “radical Republicans” impeached ANDREW JOHNSON, the PRESIDENT, NOT “his VP” (he didn’t HAVE a VP, having inherited the presidency on Lincoln’s death; replacing the VP didn’t happen until the 25th Amendment in 1967, a full CENTURY after Andrew Johnson! Again, you betray your HALF-EDUCATION.

            It’s hardly a secret that John Wilkes Booth had accomplices, who were hanged — as Booth himself would have been had he not beaten the hangman by getting shot. SO WHAT? What does your ADDLED BRAIN suggest to you THAT proves?

            I KNOW about the KKK and Hitler: the Klan didn’t so much side with him as merely endorse his racial dogma — that was bad enough. BTW, a lot of BRITISH people who had NO RACIAL ANIMUS AT ALL also sided with Hitler (some very actively), largely because they thought he might keep Germany from launching another war — this was only 20 years after WWI. Obviously they were VERY mistaken, and a few of them were HANGED for their error.

            And you might say “Americans sided with FDR,” although it would be MUCH more ACCURATE to say that WE (most Americans) OPPOSED Hitler. FDR was a PRESIDENT, not a dictator. And anyway, what POINT are you making — apart from THE ONE ON TOP OF YOUR HEAD?

          • Ever read President Lincoln’s SPOT RESOLUTIONS?
            He openly attacked President Polk!
            He spoke right from the well of the HOUSE!
            Deos Trump consider that speech AMERICAN??

          • So Lincoln attacked Polk — who is on EVERYONE’S list as one of our FIVE WORST PRESIDENTS — AND he was a Democrat. WHY should Lincoln NOT have attacked him?
            Lincoln spoke from the well of the House when he was a MEMBER of the House. Again, WHAT’S WRONG WITH THAT? And yes, I AM familiar with Lincoln’s “spot resolutions.”

            YOU didn’t live in the 19th century and neither did I. Lincoln did a BRILLIANT job of negotiating the shoals of slavery vs. abolition and, when the South refused to be reasonable, seeing the Union through the Civil War — something NO OTHER PRESIDENT has ever had to face, thanks be to God. He was a GREAT president, one of 2-3 greatest. Was he PERFECT? NO, because he was a HUMAN BEING and we humans are NOT perfect. But he WAS a giant (not just in height, either), and YOU make yourself EVER MORE OF A PYGMY with EVERY WORD you say against him. NOW GO TO HELL. You’ve become a HUGE BORE.

          • READ MY LIPS, you MORON. Lincoln DID NOT “BOLT” from the Republican Party to form the Union Party. The Union Party WAS the Republican Party — it’s a name that they used in the BORDER STATES where the name “Republican” was politically unpopular. IT WAS ALL ONE PARTY, NUMBSKULL, and BOTH TITLES (Republican and Union) SHARED THE SAME LIST OF CANDIDATES.
            Lincoln picked Johnson for VP because he needed someone who would appeal more to the Border states than HE, being from ILLINOIS, was likely to do. Obviously he (Lincoln) didn’t ANTICIPATE being assassinated and thus making Johnson President.
            The “Radical Republicans” (who were NORTHERN Republicans who wanted to PUNISH the South for the war, which Lincoln did NOT want to do) IMPEACHED JOHNSON when he was PRESIDENT (you can’t IMPEACH a VICE President) AFTER Lincoln was DEAD. Had nothing to do with Lincoln.
            EVERYONE who didn’t sleep thru Middle School history KNOWS that John Wilkes Booth had accomplices who were caught and hanged — as Booth WOULD have been, but he was shot and killed instead of being captured. WHAT DOES THAT PROVE?
            Are you expecting ANY conservative to defend the KKK? Won’t happen, you IDIOT, they were DEMOCRATS. Many did support Hitler — as did some BRITISH ARISTOCRATS who didn’t like him, but thought it would prevent WAR between Germany & Britain. Obviously they were wrong, and SEVERAL OF THEM WERE HANGED.
            As for “Americans sided with FDR,” again, you’re SHOWING YOUR IGNORANCE. Americans VOTED for FDR or for Republican Thomas Dewey (Governor of NEW YORK) according to their party preferences, as they WOULD have done if Hitler hadn’t EXISTED. Even DEMOCRATS didn’t support FDR because he opposed Hitler — in fact, in 1940 HE DID NOT clearly OPPOSE HITLER; he was playing “NEUTRAL” (the last refuge of the COWARD). USA didn’t enter war UNTIL DECEMBER 1941, and THAT was because the JAPANESE (NOT HITLER) attacked Pearl Harbor. We ended up in war against Hitler because HE WAS ALLIED WITH JAPANESE, but FDR had spent NINE YEARS TRYING TO AVOID IT. So even on basic facts of history, YOU ARE WRONG.

      • The difference is we dealt with those two sleazebags……yours are still running free in the country wreaking havoc, so yeah, we’re giving advice on the constitution AND law. Your monkeys are hiding behind a corrupt body of the lawless for now, but it WILL bite them eventually.

        • Possibly you’re not old enough to remember (it WAS a LONG time ago), but neither NIXON nor AGNEW was EVER CONVICTED of ANYTHING. and NIXON WAS NOT IMPEACHED, mainly because the House Judiciary Committee (which would have had to bring impeachment charges) COULDN’T FIGURE OUT WHAT TO ACCUSE HIM OF.
          The Constitution says a president can ONLY be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and even the Democrats couldn’t quite swallow the idea that DESTROYING HIS OWN TAPES was a “high crime.” (The tapes were NOT government property, as they would be NOW, because there WAS NO LAW making them government property — and the whole taping system had been INSTALLED BY NIXON’S PREDECESSOR, LYNDON JOHNSON, who GAVE it to Nixon as “a useful gift.”)
          So Nixon OWNED THE TAPES, and there’s no law anywhere that says a person can’t destroy something that they, personally, OWN. No matter how much someone else would LIKE to see it — they don’t have a RIGHT to see it unless it’s an official record (which it wasn’t, unlike, for instance, HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS — which SHE also destroyed, AND THAT WAS against the law!)

          As to Agnew, he wasn’t much of a sleazebag, either. HE was a man of modest means who rose, somewhat surprisingly, to the Vice Presidency. In Maryland in those days, public officials made VERY small salaries, and it was UNDERSTOOD that they could fatten their pay packets by taking a little on the side — from developers and others doing business with the state. EVERY Maryland official had his hand in the till. Agnew probably took a lot less (IF in fact he took ANYTHING AT ALL: that was never PROVED) than most.
          When the DEMOCRATS were looking for some way to get him out of the line of presidential succession (so they could go after Nixon, who was the real target), they hit on what MIGHT have been an illegal “gift” (aka; bribe), or might NOT. When Agnew was ACCUSED (not tried and DEFINITELY not convicted), he knew his political career was over, and that he’d have to spend the next TEN YEARS defending himself in court — and he DIDN’T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY FOR IT. . So he pleaded “NOLO CONTENDERE,” which does NOT mean “guilty” — it means “NO CONTEST,” or “I will not defend myself against the charge.” HE NEVER
          PLEADED GUILTY and was NEVER CONVICTED of anything.
          Just wanted to set the record straight. MAYBE they were both sleazebags, or maybe they were INNOCENT but didn’t want to tie their own lives or the Nation’s in knots for YEARS ON END to prove it.

          • You can’t say that about Bill Clinton now, can you?

          • Shelly Shannon — I can say a LOT about Bill Clinton, most of it NOT favorable: liar, perjurer, abuser of women, rapist, etc. Second President in HISTORY to be IMPEACHED (yeah, I know, not removed because the Democrats in the Senate walked the plank to save him). But I hadn’t mentioned Clinton (not Bill, anyway) in my post so I’m not sure what you’re saying I “can’t say” about him.

        • oh and once again we can add Obama, for spying and leaking information on Trump. Surprise the main stream media said he is throwing out wild allegations with no proof just Trump being Trump but oops he was right again. before this is all over some of the favorite dems will be jailed or at least banished from their party. common let’s put this out to main stream and quit hiding it under the carpet.

          • Democrats NEVER “banish” ANYONE from their party. If the person can VOTE, he/she is 100% acceptable. Example: Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz of Florida WAS the party chairwoman (or as Dems would say, “chair”). She was interfering in campaign debates last fall to favor Hillary over Bernie Sanders — her efforts MIGHT have cost Bernie the nomination. Debbie was eventually forced to step down as DNC Chair, BUT RAN AGAIN FOR CONGRESS AND WAS RE=ELECTED LAST NOVEMBER. If Dems had ANY sense of right and wrong, they’d have demanded the Hosue NOT SEAT HER (Republicans would have been happy to agree), or they’d have found someone to run against her, with party support, last fall. They did NOTHING. They WANTED her in Congress: hell, she’s a DEMOCRAT VOTE. They wouldn’t care if she was a sex offender or child-beater, or maybe Russian SPY. As long as she VOTES THEIR WAY, they don’t GIVE a damn.

      • We have several from the Obama administration who’s crimes have been covered up or the perpetrators pleaded the 5th Amendment (Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton,Lois Lerner to name just a few) and the corrupt to the core democrat lackeys did absolutely nothing to protect we the people. Now they’re pulling the same criminal tactics with the help of the corrupt and totally dishonest main stream media to invent and lie about President Trump for the one simple fact that they actually believed that we the people would vote them in again in order for them to continue to ruin and fundamentally transform America into another plantation nation that serves the global elite plantation owners.

        • Most if not all in Government belong to the same secret Sorority. They call us infidels just like the Muslims. Do some studying and you will find they are not allowed to tell on each other or they and their families will face grave harm. Plus they have taken blood oaths which forbid them from ratting on each other.

          • “Sorority”? That’s a fraternity for WOMEN! Is that what you meant?
            I think you’ve really been sold a conspiracy theory here, and it’s a whopper. There IS no ONE organization to which “most if not all in government” belong. NONE. There IS no organization with members in government that doesn’t allow its members to “tell on each other” — THAT sounds like THIRD GRADE! And there IS no organization that threatens “grave harm” to ANYONE, or has ANY kind of a “blood oath” against “ratting” on one another. I have worked in and around government for FIFTY YEARS and I can ASSURE YOU that ALL of this is TOTAL NONSENSE.

        • Excellent point. Elite Democrats = Elite Republicans = Elite MEDIA… The MEDIA is now just a propaganda arm of the Elites.

          But there is something We the People can do about the MEDIA.

          Fight back with a different type of boycott. http://www.madashellboycott.com

      • And if you stopped to count the number of convicted attorneys general from DEMOCRAT administrations, you’d be here ALL NIGHT. There have been QUITE a few — and Eric Holder WILL be added to that list in the next year or so.
        As for Spiro Agnew, he was one of the few REALLY NOT RICH people who rose as far as the Vice Presidency, and when he was confronted with allegations having to do with his time in MARYLAND politics, where (back in those days, and maybe NOW) EVERY politician was on the take), and which DEMOCRATS were making into a big thing because to bring Nixon down, they had to get Agnew FIRST, he PLEADED NOLO CONTENDERE (means “no contest”), meaning he DID NOT FIGHT the charge. It was NOT a plea bargain. He did NOT admit anything, and his RECORD remained CLEAR — as it SHOULD have, because he DID NOTHING THAT WAS ILLEGAL AT THE TIME (and as I said, that was how politicians SURVIVED, if they didn’t have family money, in Maryland).
        He did it because HE DID NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO DEFEND HIMSELF IN COURT. In a FAIR trial he could have PROVEN his innocence, but there was NO WAY he was going to get a fair trial.

        If you’re looking for thieves in politics, there are many — but you made a couple of REALLY bad choices there! And today the LAWS are VERY different.

        • MANY?
          NAME ONE!
          Thanks to Eric Holder, and his FBI, a fiend named Victor Bout is behind bars!
          Ever read the autobiography, NEVER AGAIN, by John Ashcroft?
          He, NOT Eric Holder, gave the order to RESCUE illegals!!

          • Holder who over saw the Gun Running to Mexico; Holder who was held in contempt of congress; Lynch, the bitch who met with Clinton BEFORE the FBI idiot let the hag off the hook; Should we mention the liberal hag who over saw the MURDER of innocent women and children in Waco Texas and killed the woman holding her child in Wyoming or Colorado and all done by the FBI and the DOJ?

      • The green wienie spews its load of liberal crap as usual.

      • Please stop copy/pasting your same irrelevant text as your standard (multiple and unoriginal) response to everything not off the extreme left divide. There is enough illegal corruption on both side of the aisle. Clinton crime machine, Clinton Foundation pay to play, Obama illegal legislating with only his phone and pen, Jim Wright corruption, Jim Traficant corruption to name a few.

      • You have posted EXACTLY the same few lines repeatedly, and they’re
        NO CLOSER TO CORRECT NOW than they were the first time you added them to the discussion. YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT 1) just 1 convicted Attorney General; and 2) the circumstances surrounding Vice President Agnew. AND YES, REPUBLICANS have JUST as much right to “give advice” (which wasn’t what we were doing, anyway, but what the heck) on law — WE didn’t have a president DISBARRED from practicing law AND IMPEACHED for PERJURY; WE didn’t have a Sec/State who LIED UNDER OATH, repeatedly, and WILL be prosecuted within the year (for perjury, for mishandling classified documents, and a number of other offenses). The only reason I bother to respond is because people who don’t spend a lot of time on this site may not see what you’ve been doing or KNOW how much you’re LYING. Now why don’t you just STOP IT, or find some OTHER LIES to tell?

    • QUESTION
      1) DOES the CLOWN know what the US CONSTITUTION IS??
      2) where to find one
      3) assuming he does read it
      4) Do any of his (D) Party Anarchists Understand it????

      • FEDUP CONSERVATIVE

        The answer is a big NO, NO, NO, NO!!!!
        .
        ROFLMAO

      • Understand what?

      • I really have to say (again!) that your identification of Democrats with Anarchists is RIDICULOUS.
        ANARCHISTS (by definition: look it up) believe in having NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL.
        Democrats want a BIGGER government than what we have now (which most of us think is plenty big enough, or already bigger than it should be).
        The two are almost EXACT OPPOSITES, and you destroy your own otherwise reasonable argument (that maybe the Dems should READ the Constitution) by confusing anarchists and Democrats.

    • You mean Schumer the Schemer? He is the perfect example of term limits. Overstayed his time in Congress and his legacy is nothing except self enrichment and self empowerment. Stands alongside Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.

      • He has BECOME the REASON for TERM LIMITS if ever we NEEDED one!
        THE CLOWN is a DISGRACE to have him as a US SENATOR…

      • The folks you mention aren’t terrible because they “overstayed their time in Congress.” THEY WERE TERRIBLE THE DAY THEY GOT HERE. They’re terrible because they’re RADICAL LIBERALS, aka: LEFTISTS, who don’t understand ANYTHING about what makes this nation unique. Most of them have probably not even READ the Constitution since college — if they did then!
        All of the names you mentioned, though, except Barney Frank — STARTED OUT rich! They didn’t HAVE to “enrich themselves” in Congress, and if they HAD had to, they probably couldn’t have DONE it. I know it’s a popular conception that people serve long terms in Congress to “enrich themselves,” but nowadays — the 21st century — it really doesn’t work that way. There are damn few things a member can DO anymore to get rich — at least not WHILE HE OR SHE IS SERVING IN CONGRESS.
        Many START out rich because of family wealth, a parent or spouse, or possibly some canny investments BEFORE THE ETHICS RULES WERE TIGHTENED back in the 1980s & 1990s. Today, about the ONLY way a member can make extra money (and probably not a lot of it) while serving is to write a best-seller — and best-sellers on public policy issues are very few and VERY far between!
        As for self-empowerment, that VANISHES the minute they retire. Sometimes they become lobbyists (and may in fact earn a nice pile for a FEW years, but the minute the issue they’re identified with goes off the radar, SO DO THEY).
        Some go to work for “think tanks”, which pay only moderately well, but where they MIGHT have some influence on the next generation.
        Most write one or several of those books that nobody reads: they may get good advances, but the books seldom sell very well. Or they just go home to Wherever (home state or popular mecca) and play with their grandchildren. I guess “self-empowerment” is what you make of it, but quick: NAME TWO FORMER SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE. Bet you can’t.

        • Says AN Expert in all things Congress.

          • After 30 years or so of working on or around Capitol Hill, I guess I do qualify as an expert — at least in a setting like this where a lot of people couldn’t find the Capitol on a map of Washington (not meaning YOU, just a general observation).

        • You think they can’t get rich. Just start up a foundation and see how fast it fills up with money from the favors you do for businesses.

          • First, foundations don’t make money for favors to business. They don’t DO favors for business. There are 2 kinds of foundations, essentially:
            1) started by VERY wealthy people, usually families (Ford, Rockefeller, du Pont) to DISTRIBUTE their OWN money (yeah, they have so much they want to spread it around a little, to “worthy causes” — NOT profit-making, that’s an IRS No-No!) — usually in the arts, or health-related charities, or something of the sort. The money they donate is usually tax-deductible, but that only means if the donor is in the 35% tax bracket, 35% of his/her/their donation is tax-free. The rest is taxed. The other kind of foundation is
            2) a much smaller operation that raises money FROM other people, which it then uses for its own research programs, policy initiatives, and also sometimes donations as above. THESE FOUNDATIONS CANNOT SPEND MONEY FOR PARTISAN CAUSES. Period. They CAN, however, write policy papers, books, or similar materials which they can sell OR give away to ANYONE WHO WANTS IT. That means Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Libertarians, Greenies or, for that matter, Socialists.
            Political people or organizations CAN buy those publications or request the ones that are distributed for free, but IF they’re paid for, it’s at cost. The foundations DO NOT make money off them, above expenses, and INDIVIDUALS associated with (working for, running) the foundations CANNOT pocket one thin dime of whatever funds the organization receives. And believe ME, the IRS CHECKS. You take a DOLLAR that should have gone into the foundation’s publications account or whatever, and you can go to PRISON.

      • and don’t forget Waters, Feinstein!

        • And Sheila Jackson Lee, another DUMBOcRAT, eh ?

          • JUST ANOTHER FREAK

          • You will never get her out without term limits Jackson lee is in an all black district. That only votes black.

          • I believe the day of black citizens voting for someone simply because they are black is fast coming to an end. More and more black citizens seem to be realizing just how poorly they have been treated by the right and those who use their color to steal from them. I believe they will be voting for patriots who want to serve rather than someone who wants to take and thinks their color is a free ride.

          • How they have been treated by the right? It’s the left who have conned the Black community for many years, but they are learning that the left is their enemy. Too many are too stubborn to admit it though.

          • Fish…stick to your row boat. Your White Supremist ideology is showing.

          • Marjorie Lee Peterson

            He doesn’t sound like one, but even if you’re not white, you DO!

          • Guess you haven’t looked at the “majority minority districts” in the House — those being the districts that were DESIGNED to have a MAJORITY of the voters be members of a MINORITY (either Black or Latino). Take a look at the MAPS – they give NEW and ABSURD meaning to the term “gerrymander.” And THERE WILL BE MORE SUCH DISTRICTS after the 2020 Census.

            So don’t look for “black citizens voting for someone simply because they’re black” ending any time in the next 25 years, MINIMUM. And unless Republicans keep control of state legislatures thru the 2021 redistricting (which is MUCH less likely TODAY than it was 2 days ago, before the so-called “conservatives” torpedoed President Trump’s Obamacare bill), we won’t be able to put an END to these idiotic “majority minority districts” until after the 2040 — that’s not a typo! — census.

            Don’t look for help from the Courts, either. Even the Supremes, who validated “majority minority districts” EVEN THOUGH they VIOLATE the premise that districts should be CONTIGUOUS and have roughly equal populations. Doing THAT would creat too many WHITE-majority districts, so….

          • Oh Goody…at least YOU have not been brain-washed by racists.

          • No, I’m sort of immune to brainwashing, I think. It’s been tried OFTEN and it never takes (I also never get the flu.) . 🙂

          • OOH mm, watch out….the Writer who is always Right is gonna burn you good!

          • Yea…they are getting almost as smart as you guys. Time to get back to class ,boys.

          • Right…..we should never have given “them” the vote’!! (Another JACKASS)

          • However, we did have a larger number of blacks in CA voting for Trump and not Hillary, so there is hope that they now realize Waters is out for Waters and her husband and not for them at all. She is demented as so many in Congress especially now that we know the average age in Congress is 76, which means the most are demented ancients like McCain, Pelosi, etc. We must kick the behinds of our elected and tell them they are to REPRESENT US AND NOT THEMSELVES and we want 2 terms max, ALL benefits and perks removed NOW, and a retirement age of 65 of 67 so if a latecomer, too bad! This is our country and they are owned by us and time for us to show our POWER and get their behinds to represent us, and that includes RINOS/moderates/and those like Ryan and his establishment cohort. If we don’t act, nothing will change. I suggest that the home states of Ryan and McCain recall them as they were just in last election re-elected. Surely, they have become aware of what they have caused and would want to change it. If not, let AZ and I believe Ryan is Wisconsin or maybe Wyoming, but whichever, get rid of him NOW. Both have shown they don’t like Trump upsetting their applecarts have vocalized before their dislike of Trump. McConnell needs to be getting his act together as well, and go nuclear for Trump’s selection to the SC, or be removed as well. Too many years entrenched and nothing done for the good of America and its citizens while they get rich and live the good life at our expense!

          • I Rest My Case.

        • Fine Stain is a JACKASS

        • Yeah…get them b…..hs.

      • Maxine Waters and how many more?

      • Can’t forget fienstein Mc Cain and Warren too.

      • got that right !

      • Absolutely

    • That’s a GREAT idea! In fact, it should be added to Senate rules that ANY senator trying to start a filibuster should be required to begin by reading the whole of the Constitution!
      Can’t IMAGINE why nobody thought of this before!

      • Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj497:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !mj497:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash497HomeSimpleGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj497:….,….

      • And they should be required to read it “outloud” to the rest of the RINO’s and DEM’s/.

        • Sigh, let’s get OFF the subject of “RINOs”! THEY ARE VIRTUALLY EXTINCT today, having last been spotted in the Senate around the year 2000. Today we have VERY conservative Senators, NOT-QUITE-SO-CONSERVATIVE Senators, and a handful (3-4) moderates. There’s NOT A SINGLE “RINO” LEFT.

          Believe me on this! I spent THIRTY-PLUS YEARS fighting off the REAL RINOs, and I can recognize the difference blindfolded.

          That said, I’d have NO problem having everyone who wants to start or join a filibuster read the Constitution aloud, and obviously that would BE in front of other Senators. They could ALL profit from hearing it now and then.

          • Your definition of RINO meets a different standard than mine. McCain is still in office, Ryan was a turncoat as soon as he was elected by shoving through Bummer’s budget. On and On.

          • It’s just that I REMEMBER the REAL RINOs (Nelson Rockefeller, Bill Scranton, Jake Javits — people like that) next to whom NONE of the people YOU consider RINOs stack up even close.
            The Republican party is NOT monolithic (no political party in a republic is ever monolithic). We used to call it the “BIG TENT,” until the Dems started using the same phrase to describe themselves. There IS room for a VARIETY of opinion — and we NEED a variety of opinion because if you included only people who agree 100% with YOU (or me, or anyone else) you’d end up having our NATIONAL CONVENTIONS in a CLOSET (I would have said a phone booth, but nobody knows what that MEANS anymore!)
            An early mentor of mine in politics (you’d recognize his name) once told me, “If you’re looking to support candidates with whom you agree ALL the time, you’ll have to run for office YOURSELF, because you’ll probably never find anyone else who shares ALL your views. And even that won’t help if (when) you CHANGE your opinion on something!” He was right.
            DON’T make the mistake of reading people (even John McCain) out of the party because you don’t like their positions on A or B or whatever. You and they and I share a BASIC philosophy, which makes us gravitate to the Republican Party, and NONE of us has the right to say the other(s) doesn’t/don’t measure up. Our AGREEMENTS are MUCH bigger than our DIFFERENCES, and that makes us ALL Republicans, NOT RINOs.
            If you look too hard for issue purity, you end up with a party NOT BIG ENOUGH TO WIN ELECTIONS. So then you have purity but NANCY PELOSI gets to be Speaker of the House again, and Chuck Schumer gets to be Senate Majority Leader. AND we lose the White House in 2020. Is But boy, oh boy, you’ve got PARTY PURITY. You just DON’T have election victories. Is THAT what you WANT?

          • Jocelyndmcclellan

            Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj429d:
            On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
            !mj429d:
            ➽➽
            ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash429HomeDirectGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj429d:….,……

          • Progressive Republican

            What you’ve just described are RINOs.

          • The Republican party is NOT monolithic (no political party in a republic is ever monolithic). We used to call it the “BIG TENT,” until the Dems started using the same phrase to describe themselves. There IS room for a VARIETY of opinion — and we NEED a variety of opinion because if you include only people who agree 100% with YOU (or me, or anyone else) you’d end up having our NATIONAL CONVENTIONS in a CLOSET (I would have said a phone booth, but nobody knows what that MEANS anymore!)

            DON’T make the mistake of reading people (even John McCain) out of the party because you don’t like their positions on A or B or whatever. You and they and I share a BASIC philosophy, which makes us gravitate to the Republican Party, and NONE of us has the right to say the other(s) doesn’t/don’t measure up. Our AGREEMENTS are MUCH bigger than our DIFFERENCES, and that makes us ALL Republicans, NOT RINOs.

            If you look too hard for issue purity, you end up with a party NOT BIG ENOUGH TO WIN ELECTIONS. So then you have purity but NANCY PELOSI gets to be Speaker of the House again, and Chuck Schumer gets to be Senate Majority Leader. AND we lose the White House in 2020. Is But boy, oh boy, you’ve got PARTY PURITY. You just DON’T have election victories. Is THAT what you WANT?

          • Marjorie Lee Peterson

            Ryan and McCain are blatant RINOS!

          • The Republican party is NOT monolithic (no political party in a republic is ever monolithic). There IS room for a VARIETY of opinion — and we NEED a variety of opinion because if you included only people who agree 100% with YOU (or me, or anyone else) you’d end up having our NATIONAL CONVENTIONS in a CLOSET (I would have said a phone booth, but nobody knows what that MEANS anymore!)
            DON’T make the mistake of reading people (even John McCain and CERTAINLY not Paul Ryan, ON WHOM OUR SUCCESS NOW LARGELY DEPENDS) out of the party because you don’t like their positions on A or B or whatever. You and they and I share a BASIC philosophy, which makes us gravitate to the Republican Party, and NONE of us has the right to say the other(s) doesn’t/don’t measure up. Our AGREEMENTS are MUCH bigger than our DIFFERENCES, and that makes us ALL Republicans, NOT RINOs.
            If you look too hard for issue purity, you end up with a party NOT BIG ENOUGH TO WIN ELECTIONS. So then you have purity but NANCY PELOSI gets to be Speaker of the House again, and Chuck Schumer gets to be Senate Majority Leader. AND we lose the White House in 2020. Is But boy, oh boy, you’ve got PARTY PURITY. You just DON’T have election victories. Is THAT what you WANT?

          • No, they’re not. They are REPUBLICANS who may not hold ALL the same views you do, but that does NOT make them RINOs. I don’t LIKE John McCain, but he’s NOT a RINO. As for Paul Ryan, he’s a SOLID conservative. He may not hold every opinion YOU do, but how does that make him a RINO? Why can’t we conclude it makes YOU an extremist? (I don’t, but the point is that if you read everyone who disagrees with you 10% of the time out of the party, there will be almost NOBODY left.) And since I suspect Paul Ryan (and certainly McCain) have been AT this a LOT longer than YOU have, ISN’T IT MORE LIKELY THAT THEY ARE THE REAL REPUBLICANS AND YOU ARE THE ONE WHO’S OFF OF THE MAP SOMEWHERE? Who elected YOU to decide what EVERY real Republican is supposed to think? Why don’t the ELECTED Republicans — for whom a LOT of people actually VOTED — have a greater say in what makes a REAL Republican than YOU do? THEY got elected — YOU haven’t!

            The Republican party is NOT monolithic (no political party in a republic is ever monolithic). We used to call it the “BIG TENT,” until the Dems started using the same phrase to describe themselves. There IS room for a VARIETY of opinion — and we NEED a variety of opinion because if you include only people who agree 100% with YOU (or me, or anyone else) you’d end up having our NATIONAL CONVENTIONS in a CLOSET (I would have said a phone booth, but nobody knows what that MEANS anymore!)

            DON’T make the mistake of reading people (even John McCain) out of the party because you don’t like their positions on A or B or whatever. You and they and I share a BASIC philosophy, which makes us gravitate to the Republican Party, and NONE of us has the right to say the other(s) doesn’t/don’t measure up. Our AGREEMENTS are MUCH bigger than our DIFFERENCES, and that makes us ALL Republicans, NOT RINOs.
            If you look too hard for issue purity, you end up with a party NOT BIG ENOUGH TO WIN ELECTIONS. So then you have purity but NANCY PELOSI gets to be Speaker of the House again, and Chuck Schumer gets to be Senate Majority Leader. AND we lose the White House in 2020. Is But boy, oh boy, you’ve got PARTY PURITY. You just DON’T have election victories. Is THAT what you WANT?

          • Follow the money,Always !!! Might check and see who Sores gives money to !!??

          • Neither Soros nor any of his organizations have given a DIME to conservatives of ANY stripe, whether they’re just REAL conservatives OR the ones you think are pure, or the ones you think are RNOS. Now, there ARE other bad-guy financial types, and there ARE donors of both parties who give smallish donations (maybe $1000 or so) to members of the party they consider the “opposition.” It’s a good ((and for these rich guys not very costly) way to keep smooth relations, and rich guys in BOTH parties do it — DONALD TRUMP used to do it!

            The point isn’t who gives them a few bucks: the point is THAT THEY AGREE WITH US ON 70%-80%-even 90% of ISSUES. THAT MAKES THEM REAL REPUBLICANS AND REAL CONSERVATIVES. The guys/gals who agree only 40% of the time, or less — THOSE are the people you CAN call “RINOs”

          • These Politicians do follow the Money , but no matter how rich they get , You never see it going with them to the Grave!

          • Marion E McKenzie

            Rightwriter How long have you been on Rino Ryan’s Staff???Snow flake…

          • I am confused what is the difference between a RINO and a Traitor speaking of the Top four McConnell Graham McCain and Ryan

          • Ryan and McCain are Libtards!!!!

          • Ryan is a turn coat ! As for John ( Songbird) McCain will he is just a trader to his country ! Ask any of his fellow prisoners from the Hanoi Hilton !

          • No doubt you know a lot of those people but what would you call the 6 most powerful “Rhino” in the senate: John McCain; Mitch Mcdonnell; Lindsay Graham; Orin Hatch; Ray Blunt and Thad Cochran?

          • I meant to write McConnell but my pc got ahead of me. sorry

          • lol.. personally call them traitors to America.

          • Seems like you have missed one , John McCain , or as people who know him call him Songbird .

        • Progressive Republican

          Remember how the GOP read the Constitution out loud a while back?

          Well, except for the uncomfortable parts anyway.

        • I once knew the entire Constitution, including the Bill of Rights and later amendments (there were 25 then) by heart. Sadly, I’ve forgotten bits of it — maybe that’s a sign of old age, or maybe I just don’t read it as often as I used to. If you know it by heart, I congratulate you — it is WELL worth the learning!

      • BUT can anyone of these (D) Anarchists LOCATE their COPY and Can they read it???? Or are they too occupied with reading the ALINSKY DOCTRINE Daily????

    • Yes!!

    • Everyone who disagrees with Gorsuch’s confirmation aren’t democrats and sure as fuck not dimwits. Read on!

      • Well just who are they you how about just read it to us

      • SURE DIMWIT!! SURE…..

      • Apart from trying to shock someone (is anyone EVER shocked nowadays?) with your use of foul language, does your post actually MEAN something? Are you saying Democrats DISAGREE with Gorsuch’s confirmation — that’s just absurd; THEY WILL BE THE ONLY PEOPLE VOTING AGAINST THE NEWEST JUSTICE! And who is or is not a dimwit? (apart from YOURSELF, based on your meaningless post) Then you say “Read On” — but there’s NOTHING THERE to READ. When you wrote this post were you DRUNK? High? Or is you mind just not functional?

    • Schumer read the Constitution???
      That would be like putting the wicked old witch of the west in water……

    • If you actually read the entire U.S. Constitution to the Congress you will see
      little puffs of smoke in the Congress as the Democrat Socialist explode like
      Vampire when exposed to sun light. Course it might be an easy way to
      remove some of the trash in Congress as there will be some RINO’s who
      might also explode from their hypocrisy.

    • I agree! And perhaps the members of Congress who are so set against President Trump’s temporary travel ban need to also read the Koran! Islam is not just a religion, it is also an ideology that spews hatred against Jews and Christians [“People of the Book”]! There is a goal for Islam and that is to convert the entire world into an Islamic Caliphate! The United States is a “target” for conversion. For decades, Judeo-Christianity has been under attack by the ACLU, People for the American Way, Citizens for the Separation of Church and State, Move-on.org, and others. But, Bible believers know how it ends, and that end is not too far away!

    • And start upholding it like they took the oath to do in the first place and actually doing their jobs instead of just whining and doing everything they can to block anything and everything that President Trump tries to accomplish. They care more about what they want personally instead of what the voters want who elected them in the first place. Demoncraps are a breed that will never make any sense at all ever.

    • Phyllis Handkins

      Not enough pictures.

    • Statesman Patriot

      It doesn’t matter whether the libtard dimwits read the constitution at all, or even how many time they’ve read it.
      They have an agenda and it is to completely change our narrative on liberty as a Republic!
      Every liberal and many so called conservatives still call our form of government a democracy (mob rule). That has been a lie pushed through our guvmint education system for 100 years.

    • Chuck the schemer doesn’t care about the Constitution because he didn’t write it: therefore, it doesn’t exist.

    • Marjorie Lee Peterson

      Amen! They sure don’t seem to know now!

    • They have no clue and like the Marxist/Elites they are they could care less and thus completely guilty of violation of office along with obstructionism and a long list of other things.

    • Heck Adam Schiff who was a CLINTON OPerative, Sat on the Benghazi Commission, and now is on the RUSSIA Crap Excuse commission who wants Devin Nines tp Recluse Himself from the “TAPPING” commission…Why nor Hvae some REPUB with GOnads to TELL the CLOWN to Recluse ITSELF from the Human race and Go find a Jib as a Janitor…It makes as much sense as the DO NOTING WHINING LOSERS OF 2016……SCMHUCKIE UPCHUCK is as USELESS as TEATS on a BULL and his (D) anarchist party trolls are as USELESS

      NOT all SARCASM

    • It is not their fault they know nothing about the Constitution as most do not know how to read. Schumer is probably looking at a blank piece of paper & wearing an earpiece.

    • The class A Chuckle Head is a bitter old bastard, he does not care about the American people it is all about the party screw us!

  3. For the past 8 years the Obama Administration along with B. Obama and the Democrats in Office and even not in Office have lied and deceived the American citizens, why should they quit now? No, their agenda, their ideology has been stalled but they will continue to do what they can to destroy the United States and its Republic U.S. Constitution. They will do all they can to block Congress from working for the benefit of the American people. Senator Chuck Schumer and his Ilk are exactly what is wrong in Congress.

    • Are you one of the 24 million who will lose your healthcare insurance if the Republicans are successful? That’s a lot of people. Hope you and your kids are not among them.

      • You believe that crap that all the MSM is spewing out, then count yourself among the stupid people who like you probably voted for Queen Hilary and her Progressive/Socialist NWO party! Who would of done away with borders, jobs and welfare, then where would you be Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, freezing or roasting in a one room house with maybe a garden and a few chickens working for the Queen and her servants!

        • John Craig bro with Hillary more like living in a cardboard box under a bridge if even that, skankary would charge rent for the box

        • ” . . . done away with borders, jobs and welfare . . . ” Did you learn that at Trump University?

          • You’re NOTHING but an IMBECILE with an IQ that is SUB-ZERO, what with only ONE BRAIN CELL, and even that’s a SHEEPLE cell, eh ?

          • Did you donate your brain to planned baby killers? Did you have your intelligence indoctrinated out?
            Don’t bother to answer, it would be nothing more than the babbling of an absolute idiot.

        • It’s not even the mainstream media: “mythfighter.com” is a FAR LEFT website FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS.

          It’s like saying the Kremlin’s TV channel, RT, is mainstream. NOT QUITE! 🙂

      • Before I went for a less expensive insurance, my private insurance premium $10800 with a $6000 deductible, and than depending on the problem it covered 20% to 60% of the cost. Sorry that is the problem with the ACA, it redistributes money !!!!

        • And what will the Republican plan cover?

          • Guess you will have to wait and see. At least the Republicans are reading the bill before they pass it.

          • Actually, they never cared about what was in the bill, so long as they could vote against Obama. What they were reading were letters from outraged constituents.

            That’s why they dumped their bill.

          • You really have no clue.

          • More stupidity from a mentally deficient left winger Jackass butt kissing liberal moron.

          • of course they did, that’s why they didn’t just pass it like the dems did. they made sure everyone had an opportunity to read and discuss it. At least they cared about what their constituents wanted, again, like the dems could give a shit and passed it anyway.

          • You’re wrong, which somehow doesn’t surprise me a BIT — you’ve been wrong on EVERYTHING you’ve SAID.
            Republicans DID care what was in their bill; THAT IS WHY THEY COULDN’T GET AGREEMENT ON IT. They didn’t “dump it”; they pulled it back until they could work out A FEW DETAILS that will allow them to reach agreement. UNLIKE THE DEMOCRATS, who follow their leader no matter WHERE he takes them — including RIGHT OFF A CLIFF (that’s where they’ll be going when Obamacare COLLAPSES and not 20 million, but EIGHTY MILLION Americans DESCEND ON THEIR OFFICE IN FURY!)

            At that point, the ONLY bill on the table WILL BE THE REPUBLICAN PLAN — and it will PASS OVERWHELMINGLY.

            And Obama and his cronies in Congress will be the ones who get the blame (correctly) for a BAD program (Obamacare) AND letting them end up with NO PROGRAM AT ALL. Yeah, that should WIN THE REPUBLICANS ANOTHER 4-5 SENATE SEATS and maybe TWENTY more seats in the House.

            Maybe we should be THANKING you idiots for giving us a VETO-PROOF REPubLICAN CONGRESS

          • AMEN!

          • Hopefully NOTHING but the RIGHT to choose our own insurance plan and what we want covered BY that plan and also the RIGHT to pick ANY insurance company in the USA to provide that plan. ANY other asinine questions you butt kissing moronic jackass lover.

          • Pam Dunn — You expressed that beautifully! The “right to choose” the insurance WE want/need is (or should be) the basis of ANY health insurance reform plan. And that includes 50-state purchases. Also the right to put our own money TAX-FREE in a Medical Savings Account to cover basic expenses.

          • If you were paying attention that is what they are working out. See it’s a little different when you don’t pass it to see what’s in it. They want to make sure what they have first.

          • Republicans have a VARIETY of health insurance options — no more of Obama’s “ONE SIZE FITS ALL” and “you’d better take what we give you OR ELSE”! CRAP. Insurance companies AND groups of the insured CAN WORK TOGETHER to design insurance that FITS the group designing it, so there will be LOTS of options and LOTS of price levels. WE DON’T ASSUME A 58-year-old woman and a 27-year-old man HAVE THE SAME INSURANCE NEEDS, which is the idiotic notion on which Obamacare was based. And the NEW Republican plan (to be presented after Easter) will even IMPROVE on the options offered in the original bill that was withdrawn yesterday.
            See, not everyone is as STUPID as the Obamaniks!

          • Then, too, Republicans HAVE THE CHANCE TO READ THEIR BILLS before voting on them. Even Nancy Pelosi (then and never again Speaker) wouldn’t even ALLOW the Democrats to do THAT — and she presented it as a PLUS

        • Well said.

      • If you Actually paid attention to the FACTS, You would know that comment is PURE BullSh*t. The only people who ill not have Healthcare are those who CHOOSE not to PAY for it, Like now, The CBO was so WRONG with it’s estimates regarding Osludgecare, Well over 50 %. The ones who flat out lose Health care are those ho are Able Bodied & able to work yet Refuse to, In other words the LAZY F*CKS who want Everything for Free. We all know who they are, Try to Actually finds the facts rather than be a Mouth piece for maddow.

      • The first 14 million that will be uninsured, will be by choice. They are no longer FORCED to buy healthcare. “The number of uninsured would shoot up next year by 14 million, the
        budget office said. Most of the increase in 2018 would result from
        people choosing not to buy insurance after tax penalties for those
        without coverage are repealed.” I would say the other 10 million would be the ILLEGALS that have no right to begin with.
        Just to be clear. Healthcare is not guaranteed to anyone, you have to buy it. My healthcare under obamas doing raised my deductible from $500 to $10,000, I may as well no even have it.
        Look how many lost the health care they had for years under obama who promised if you like your current plan or Dr. you can keep them. So where were all you snowflakes then?

        • That “24 million uninsured” fiction includes (as you say) the people who DROP OBAMACARE once they no longer HAVE to carry insurance. Then there are some who don’t use what we think of as medical services: Christian Scientists and various other faiths reject medicine entirely. I don’t ENDORSE that point of view, but it EXISTS; and even Obamacare exempted such people from the “requirement” to carry insurance.

          You’re absolutely right about the deductibles under Obamacare. Very few people can afford a $10,000 deductible, especially when most don’t run up medical bills anywhere NEAR that high in a LIFETIME, never mind ONE year. Sorry you got nailed with that kind of rate hike, and sorry the House failed yesterday to kill the whole rotten mess! 🙁

          You’re right about illegals, too, though the Congressional Budget Office “estimates” (that’s all they WERE!) on how many people would drop coverage supposedly didn’t count illegals. I just wonder, though. Considering how much trouble local authorities everywhere are having IDENTIFYING illegals, how the heck can they KNOW they weren’t counted in the CBO survey?

      • And it wouldn’t (won’t, because this fight is not over) HAPPEN, either. The assumption that X million people would lose their coverage if the Republican bill passed is (was) based on the dubious assumption that EVERYONE who had Obamacare would WANT TO DROP THEIR PLAN even before an alternative became available. That’s just silly. Some undoubtedly WOULD be lined up to drop their super-expensive, limited ACA plan as soon as they COULD; others would have said “well, let’s wait and see how this all works out” before they did anything. And many who DO drop their ACA plan as soon as they can will be able to opt into association plans or some other kind of INTERSTATE plan that comes into being the MINUTE the ACA is DEAD. So they’ll be WITHOUT insurance for a day or two, maybe LESS.

        The assumption ALSO neglects to count the NUMBER OF AMERICANS WHO WILL LOSE THEIR ACA COVERAGE, whether they like it or not, BECAUSE INSURERS ARE PULLING OUT IN DROVES (or going out of business) and in a few months 20-24 states WILL NOT BE OFFERING ANY ACA INSURANCE AT ALL. That’s a LOT more than 24 million people: more like 124 MILLION.

        The Congressional Budget Office is more trouble than it’s worth. It is staffed almost 100% by activist liberals, even when the Director is a Republican, because the liberals have been there forever and no new Speaker wants to FIRE them (me, I’d have them all out the door by COB on the day I took over!). They ALWAYS miss their projections on everything but straight, simple dollars-and-cents projections. THAT they can do, but so can any HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT with a CALCULATOR. Beyond that, they have NEVER made an even REMOTELY accurate projection. So why should anything change NOW?

        • Did you learn all this information at Trump University?

          • Do you learn all your idiocy in the local pile of donkey dung or was it at the pile of pig Shyte from the local liberal sty?

          • Rodger Malcolm Mitchell — no, actually I never HEARD of Trump University until sometime during the campaign in 2015 or last year. When I went to school (The George Washington University) most of the current crop of “somebody wanted his name on a university” schools didn’t exist, and even if they had, I wouldn’t have attended. YOU seem to be the one with some difficulties in discerning what’s FACT and what’s, well, not fiction, exactly, but the product of someone’s imagination. Now please go leave the grownups alone.

      • Are you aware that even if that were to happen as you say it wouldn’t be until 2025?

      • AND you have obviously sucked up the pile of liberal donkeyshyte idiocy and lies. DO NOT EVER forget that 30 MILLION people lost INSURANCE policies THAT LIKED thanks to the abortion called obamacare.

      • Yes, I read your B.S. Article, And as usual it’s nothing more than liberal Spittle !!!

  4. Worse than WATERGATE??
    Can you say INOPERATIVE??
    Forgot Benghazi?
    What did Putin know?
    When did he know it?
    What did he tell Trump?

    • maybe Hillary can sell the Russians more uranium. Putin as told Trump nothing, the only on guilty of trying to rig the election is Hillary and the Dems they cheated Bernie Sanders and the tried to get over on trump but wikileaks caught them, and it was shown that wikileaks was not working with Russia to get their information. Russia and our election is only a thing because the Dems drummed it up after Trump said even the Russian could hack Hillary’s files. even with wiretapping and everything else there is nothing showing that Donald Trump and the Russians did anything to rig the election or had any influence on any of he votes

    • “Well, if you look at some people connected with Hillary Clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind,” he said. “There are lots of specialists in politology, people working in think tanks advising Hillary or advising people working for Hillary.”
      Dmitry Peskov, Russian ambassador

    • Hey someone might of hacked Hilary’s email, but only because she used unsecured servers to transmit classified info, but you can’t hack an election machine, so the voters got what they wanted and you libs can’t stand it! Of course, most of you libs don’t want to believe that like Obama, Hilary was just a puppet to George Soros and his Progressive/Socialist World Globalization Party that wanted the USA to have open borders and all of our jobs sent overseas(THE TPP treaty)so that we could become like North Korea or China and have rulers instead of elected officials or worse yet, be ruled by a Caliphate and be under Sharia Law!

    • Why did Obama tell the Russian representative to tell Mr. Putin “I will have more flexibility after the election” in 2012? How much did Hillary make on the uranium deal she signed off on to Russia? Why did Bill Clinton make $500,000 for a speech in Moscow shortly after the deal went thru?

    • Yeah, MUCH worse than Watergate. And MY statements are NOT inoperative. First, Watergate was a BREAK-IN of the DNC offices by five burglars who THOUGHT they had the approval of the President, or someone close to him, BUT DID NOT. They were LIED to, not by Nixon — whom they HAD NEVER SEEN before the incident — but by someone on the staff of the Committee to Re-elect the President (also known as CREEP). They were misinformed, misguided, misdirected, given orders by someone who had NO AUTHORITY to give ANYONE orders, much less order a break-in. (The burglars were arrested and duly convicted of breaking an entering. NOTHING was stolen.
      NIXON DIDN’T EVEN FIND OUT ABOUT IT UNTIL HE READ THE MORNING NEWSPAPERS THE NEXT DAY. He couldn’t have covered it up because he didn’t KNOW about it, and THAT is a matter of evidence. There’s another reason for certainty that Nixon wasn’t involved: whatever else one may say about him (and I can say a LOT that is NOT flattering) he was a VERY smart politician, and he knew perfectly well that any such action would be BLAMED on HIM (no matter WHAT the FACTS). He was certainly NOT DUMB ENOUGH to pull a stupid stunt like that.
      NIXON WAS NEVER LEGALLY ACCUSED OF ORDERING OR PLANNING THE BREAK-IN, and the only people who thought (or think now) he had anything to do with it are the conspiracy theorists of the far left. He WAS accused of two things: 1) covering up the facts (which was NOT provable, because he NEVER HAD THE FACTS; and 2) destroying audio tapes that might have proved his guilt.
      Now, the tape thing is interesting. One of Nixon’s aides revealed in the course of the Watergate hearings that there was an audio-taping system in the Oval Office that turned on automatically whenever someone spoke, The question was, was there anything incriminating on the tapes for the period just after the break-in? Well, NO. There was a lot of locker-room language (nothing by today’s standards, but shocking in 1968) but NO PROOF OF ANYTHING. People were screaming for Nixon to “release the tapes!” He eventually did, and everyone was disappointed to find nothing worse than some rude guy-talk. But NIXON DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE THE TAPES. They were his PERSONAL PROPERTY. There was NO LAW at the time that required him to release anything that didn’t belong to the government under EXISTING law, and the tapes did not. The tape system had been installed by Nixon’s predecessor, Lyndon Johnson, who GAVE IT to him saying it MIGHT prove helpful one day if the press was accusing him of saying something he didn’t remember saying. Famous last words!
      He COULD (probably SHOULD have) DESTROYED them, but he wanted them for his memoirs. Stupidest thing Nixon EVER did.
      Anyway, the House Judiciary Committee, which was considering impeachment, COULDN’T FIND ANYTHING TO PIN ON HIM that could even REMOTELY be considered “high crimes or misdemeanors” (the only CONSTITUTIONAL grounds for impeachment. BUT..the country was in a dither and Nixon realized the last 2 years and 4 months of his second term (he had WON comfortably, 301-191-45 electoral votes — the 45 were for George Wallace, who carried several “deep south” states). would be a nightmare, and the country WAS in the middle of a very-nearly-hot “Cold War,” so he did what he thought was the statesmanlike thing, and RESIGNED the presidency. HE WAS NEVER IMPEACHED, much less convicted, and never accused of ANYTHING in a court of law.

  5. If it was up to the whoopie and her gossiping gals on TV.,they would sink everything and anything except their sickening agenda. Leave whoopie. You and Obama apologize, then leave.

    • Dale couldn’t have said it better myself. I wish we could deport them by 1 way trip to another planet lol

      • Hey, they’ve just found all those HUNDREDS of tiny new planets, many in THIS solar system (meaning it’s possible for the current level of technology to GET there). Maybe we could send the Obamas?

        • RightWriter send them there hell I’ll spring for shipping fees express send off lol

        • LOL! As soon as we get a new Director for NASA who shares President Trump’s interest in MANNED space exploration (instead of just cute little robots that run around Mars), maybe we can get something going!

    • Hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but Obama just bought a HUGE house — WAY too big for his family, meaning he’s planning to run a fancy B&B for his leftwing cronies — BARELY A MILE FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

      Supposedly they were only going to stay in Washington until their daughter finished high school in June, but now it looks like they’re going to be here FOREVER, attracting media attention every time they open their mouths. And of course pulling down HUGE speaker fees, like Hillary did/does. We can expect AT LEAST one ANTI-TRUMP TIRADE per WEEK, maybe MORE.

      Fasten your seat belt: it’s gonna be a wild ride for 3.75 years!

  6. NO matter what happens WE MUST SEE INDICTMENTS , Obama in GITMO and the (D) ANARCHY PARTY FREE OF SOROS whi mUST be SEVERELY INVESTIGATED

    • Why can’t you get it thru your head: the Democrats are the OPPOSITE of Anarchists! Democrats want BIGGER, more powerful government. Anarchists want NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL. Putting them together just DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
      I don’t think I want Obama in Gitmo: I don’t want him in any kind of association with ISIS or Taliban or Al Qaida terrorists. Most of those guys don’t really know what it is they’re working for, but OBAMA would fill their heads with the PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS of their terrorism. An EDUCATED terrorist is always MUCH more dangerous than one who just knows how to make bombs.

  7. The media was part of the demotard criminal activity, complicit up to their stinking traitor necks! That’s why the maximum attacks on Trump, deflection and distraction. When the goobers begin singing to save their own sorry a$$e$, the cabal will fold. Can’t be soon enough….

  8. ” . . . it appeared to go a long way towards proving that President Trump was right all along: Trump Tower was wiretapped.”

    Actually, it doesn’t, which Nunes later admitted.

    “They know that whatever meetings Trump’s associates had with Russian officials were innocuous in nature . . .”

    Actually, they don’t, which is why the investigation is only in its early stages.

    “Just as likely, however, is that the Obama holdovers and the Democrats have reverse-engineered this entire investigation for the purpose of sabotaging Trump’s presidency.”

    Created out of thin air, to try to defend a President who, before the election, publicly invited Russia to hack Clinton’s Emails.

    The writer of the above article must have received his education at Trump University.

    Meanwhile, I pray none of the readers is among the 24 million people who will lose healthcare if ACA is overturned.

    • Oh yea those are the 24 million that are illegals and people who are jobless with no welfare because they don’t belong here and don’t pay for the insurance, the hard working 40% pay there way and maybe yours too!

    • They have been investigating this since July 2016, and to date they have nothing,

    • FEDUP CONSERVATIVE

      YOU want ALL AMERICAS to loose their health care?????? UNDER THE ACA THEY WILL!!!!!!!
      It is designed to FAIL and take this country DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • You may be correct, which is why both parties should stop trying to defeat the other, and instead work for the benefit of America. The goal of a great nation should be to make sure everyone — rich and poor– has health care.

        The solution is to provide federally funded Medicare to every man, woman, and child in America.

        Rather that criticize the poor for being poor, we should work to make all of America great, again.

        • Oh, I see…we should stop having arguments between the parties and “work for the benefit of America” BY DOING WHAT YOU WANT, not what people like ME (or FedUp Conservative) think would be best. In other words, conservatives/republicans should just GIVE UP OUR IDEAS and help YOU and YOUR friends turn the U.S.A. into the UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERIKA (U.S.S.A. – and the “K” in “Amerika” is NOT a typo).

          WHY THE HELL SHOULD WE GIVE UP AND DO EVERYTHING YOUR WAY???? WE won the last election, you MORON, not just the presidency but a SOLID MAJORITY in the House, 33 of 50 Governorships, 31 state legislatures, and 52 Senate seats. YOUR gang has LOST 1,000 LEGISLATIVE SEATS in the last 6 years — TO US. YOU haver lost control of the House AND the Senate. AND you lost the White House, even though you had a supposedly “unbeatable” candidate in Hillary Clinton.
          SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT’S PATRIOTIC SHOULD WE DO ANYTHING AT ALL according to YOUR
          PLANS???? Maybe IF you win a few elections again some day you’ll have the STANDING TO ASK US, but certainly NOT NOW, in 2017.

          Tell you what, idiot, YOU DO IT OUR WAY for awhile and then maybe we’ll talk. In perhaps 10 years, or 20.

          • You make a good argument. With the vast majorities you mention, why was “Trumpcare despised by a vast majority of Americans, and with all those majorities you mention, why couldn’t Trumpcare get passed?

          • “Elections have consequences.” — Barack Obama, refusing to pay ANY attention to suggestions for health care reform from ANY of the Republicans.
            Yeah, well NOW the shoe is on the other foot, and it will be the REPUBLICAN version of health care reform that gets passed.

            I don’t know w* n’t come from any FACTUAL source. For starters, since there’s NO BILL being debated NOW, there IS no such thing as “Trumpcare,” and nobody knows for sure just what it would look like — so “despising” it is JUST A TAD PREMATURE. YOU don’t know — NOBODY knows — what the final bill will actually SAY. So you’re hating a something you can’t even DESCRIBE. Brilliant (not!)!

            As for why “Trumpcare 1.0” didn’t pass, let me try to explain the difference between the way Republicans and Democrats do things.

            * Democrats get MARCHING ORDERS from their “party leaders” — the President, when you have one, the DNC Chair (when you have one who has actually been in his office for more than 5 minutes), the Democrat leaders in House and Senate. And they ALL swing into formation like good little ROBOTIC TIN SOLDIERS and VOTE EXACTLY AS THEY’RE TOLD. And then they READ the bills AFTER THEY’VE APPROVED THEM (we have THAT from the lips of no less than Speaker Pelosi).

            * Republicans, on the other hand, READ AND DEBATE THE BILLS BEFORE PASSING THEM, and there are a wide range of different opinions among various groups within the party. That can make it harder to get a majority: if one group doesn’t LIKE a bill, they may withhold their votes (as happened this time). You might say WE believe in DEMOCRACY, rather than in marching in lockstep over the nearest cliff. So on difficult, complex, and controversial legislation it CAN take more than one try to assemble our majority. But when we DO, we will at least KNOW EVERYONE HAS ACTUALLY READ THE BILL — AND MADE UP THEIR OWN MINDS, not had their “leaders” DICTATE to them. Got it?

          • Good thought. Unfortunately, after 7 years of trying, the GOP came up with such an awful bill, that only 16% of the country liked it. If that is the best they can do in 7 years, what makes you think they could do any better in the future?

            The problem with the GOP is that they live in a fake world. Some wrongly believe the federal government can run short of dollars, so the people (who apparently have infinite dollars) should pay.

            Others wrongly believe the poor are lazy sloths, who only want “free stuff,” and those people should receive nothing.

            So you have two factions, both deluded, who can’t see the facts in front of their eyes. That is why the GOP is great at saying “No,” but awful at actually governing for the benefit of the people.

    • EVERY diplomat, from any country with which we’re not actively at WAR (and we’re NOT at war with Russia these days, or hadn’t you noticed), meets with top representatives of ANY presidential candidate. It’s the diplomats’ JOB to get to know people who may be at the right hand of the next president, and it’s part of the campaign aide’s job (especially if he hasn’t had a long career in Washington, making friends with diplomats) to get to know the top diplomats. Bugging,, on the other hand, is a NO-NO.

      President Trump, who is 70 years old, is not totally “clued in” to either computer lingo or the numerous techniques for bugging that have been developed in recent years. He used a word — “wiretapping” — that isn’t quite up to date. SO WHAT? We didn’t elect him to be IT MANAGER IN CHIEF, we elected him to be PRESIDENT. There are PLENTY of computer nerds around (some of them can even READ!) who can update his computer skills (hey, how many 70-year-olds do YOU know who Tweet? Constantly? I’d give him credit and stop slamming him for a misused WORD.

      As to that “24 million people will lose health care” crap, it’s CRAP. The assumption that X million people would lose their coverage if the Republican bill passed is (was) based on the dubious assumption that EVERYONE who had Obamacare would WANT TO DROP THEIR PLAN even before an alternative became available. That’s just silly. First, if ACA insurance is as wonderful as you suggest, NOBODY will want to drop it! In reality, some undoubtedly WOULD be lined up to drop their super-expensive, limited ACA plan as soon as they COULD; others would have said “well, let’s wait and see how this all works out” before they did anything. And many who DO drop their ACA plan as soon as they can will be able to opt into association plans or some other kind of INTERSTATE plan that comes into being the MINUTE the ACA is DEAD. So they’ll be WITHOUT insurance for a day or two, maybe LESS.

      The Congressional Budget Office’s assumption ALSO neglects to count the NUMBER OF AMERICANS WHO WILL LOSE THEIR ACA COVERAGE, whether they like it or not, BECAUSE INSURERS ARE PULLING OUT IN DROVES (or going out of business) and in a few months 20-24 states WILL NOT BE OFFERING ANY ACA INSURANCE AT ALL. That’s a LOT more than 24 million people: more like 124 MILLION.

      So it’ll be a few more weeks before ACA insurance is totally GONE, but it WILL happen — if not because Congress acts, then because the plans DIE as they’re already DYING. And a few months more after that before a NEW, market-driven system is up and running. AND ANYONE WHO WANTS TO KEEP OBAMACARE, but SEES IT VANISH in the next six months, will know who to blame: THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS. It won’t be Donald Trump’s fault: HIS plan wasn’t approved. So NOW IT’S ALL YOUR FAULT. Enjoy!

      • What is the goal: To win the political battle, or to make sure that every man, woman, and child in America is able to receive health care?

        I suggest it is the latter, and that the only way to achieve it is to provide federally funded Medicare for all.

        The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, easily can afford it, while simultaneously cutting taxes. We can learn Monetary Sovereignty and truly “make America great again,” or we can bicker about “libtards” and “lazy takers” while our country goes down the drain.

        It’s our choice.

        • First, just to set the record straight: I NEVER use terms like “libtard” or even “lazy takers,” although the latter is at least a pair of real English words.
          Second, “monetary sovereignty”: I happen to believe that monetary sovereignty that requires the issuance of fiat currency (currency not backed by something of substance: gold is the most often used example, although Milton Friedman used to say it could even be pork bellies, just as long as it had quantifiable value) is a snare and a delusion. Printing money is not the answer — it’s a DIRECT path to NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY. We’ve already been on that path FAR longer than is safe (FDR broke the primary link with monetary gold in the 1930s, and Nixon severed the last link in 1972. Proving that BOTH parties can produce economically ILLITERATE Presidents.
          We are ALREADY $20 TRILLION in debt, with probably a trillion in vitally necessary infrastructure repairs on the horizon: and YOU want to provide “Medicare for all” — and cut taxes at the SAME TIME???? You gotta be KIDDING! BTW, Medicare isn’t much of a good deal ANYWAY. I’m almost 74, and I’ve been living with it for 9 years. Like MOST government services, IT STINKS.
          Problem #1: it’s almost impossible to find a doctor or even clinic that will ACCEPT it; Problem #2, it IS impossible to find a doctor who will take it and ALSO SPEAKS ENGLISH as a primary language. Now, I speak Spanish and pretty good French, and I deal with non-native speakers all the time, but when it comes to MY HEALTH I want to be SURE I understand what the doctor is saying and that he or she understands what I AM SAYING. Medical care is NOT the place for linguistic uncertainty.

          So you’ll excuse me if I don’t get excited about the prospect of “Medicare for everyone.” It’s bad enough that SENIORS have to deal with it, but EVERYBODY???? Believe me, YOU don’t WANT it. And even if you DID impose “Medicare for everyone,” it WOULD NOT enable “every child in America” to receive health care – – at least, NOT GOOD HEALTH CARE. Even now, every child whose parent, guardian or caregiver GETS OFF HIS OR HER BUTT and takes the child to a private physician OR a clinic CAN get free health care that’s usually much BETTER than Medicaid. And if the Obamacare plan hadn’t KILLED medical savings accounts, and if we could have interstate sales of health insurance (like we do car insurance, or home insurance, or ANY OTHER PRODUCT ON THE PLANET) and if we incentivized pharmceutical companies to better control costs, we’d have EVEN BETTER medical care AVAILABLE RIGHT NOW. Or when the House gets off ITS collective posterior and PASSES the American Health Care Act or something like it.
          Medicare for all means LOUSY MEDICAL CARE for all, available only if you can FIND and communicate with a doctor. And “monetary sovereignty” with fiat currency to cover medical costs for everyone is a short road to economic PERDITION.

          • I’m sorry and surprised you have had a bad experience with Medicare. Where do you live? I live in the Chicago area, where 99% of all doctors and 100% of hospitals accept Medicare.

            My wife and I have been on Medicare for 17 years, and neither of us have experienced any of the problems you suggest.

            As for the so-called federal “debt,” it isn’t debt as most people understand it. To “lend” to the federal government, you invest in a T-security (T-bill, T-note, T-bond). You instruct your bank to debit your checking account and to credit your T-security account at the Federal Reserve Bank.

            In short, the “debt” is nothing more than deposits in T-security accounts.

            To pay you back, the federal government merely transfers existing dollars from you T-security account back to your checking account. No new dollars needed. The federal government could pay off the entire debt tomorrow, if it chose to do so, by transferring existing dollars from all T-security accounts back to checking accounts.

            Through wars, depressions, recessions and disease, the federal government never has been unable to create the dollars to pay its bills, no have we ever had a hyperinflation. So the concerns about Monetary Sovereignty are false.

            The debt is a <a href="https://mythfighter.com/2016/02/10/from-ticking-time-bomb-to-looming-collapse/ In 1940, the "debt" was " was a “ticking time-bomb which can eventually destroy the American system,” said Robert M. Hanes, president of the American Bankers Association.”

            At that time, the “debt” (deposits) was $50 billion. Today it is $20 trillion and that old time bomb still is ticking — and still no bankruptcy.

            So the prediction has been wrong for 77 years, and will continue to be wrong, forever. It is 100% impossible for our Government to run short of dollars to pay its bills.

            Bottom line: Federally funded Medicare for all is the only way to assure that even the poorest among us receives good healthcare — and at no cost to you or anyone else.

            All the dire predictions about Monetary Sovereignty have been proved wrong , and none has been proved right.

            At long last, it’s time for us to stop fretting about what might, possibly, could happen, and truly begin to make America great again.

            Protecting all of us is what a great nation should do.

          • I KNOW what the federal debt is; I’m not some ignorant millennial trying to spell “debt.” But you make it sound a lot more innocent than it is. 1) WHEN THE TREASURY PAYS YOU BACK, it pays you in dollars that HAVE LOST VALUE since you made your investment in T-bills or whatever. That’s why investors have been so ROYALLY SCREWED by the barely-more-than-Zero-percent interest rates of recent years. So you “invested” by lending money to the Treasury and you get a NEGATIVE payback. This, while the stock market (the Dow) has gone from 10,000 a couple of years ago to over 21,000 today.

            2) WHOSE “dire predictions” about “monetary sovereignty”? NOT MINE. I am FOR a GOLD STANDARD, which is hardly a “dire prediction”: it’s PUTTING FAITH IN THE FUTURE OF HARD MONEY, not fiat paper issued by a Treasury that might not even BE IN BUSINESS in 20 years (or might be issuing currency with picture of Mohammed on it). GOLD will still have its value, whether the Treasury goes bankrupt or not. Or WHEN, since eventually it WILL..

            I do agree with you that “protecting all of us is what a great nation should do” — up to a point. The government, which is the locus of our “great nationhood,” should protect us from FOREIGN ATTACK (hello, ISIS!) and at home, from CRIMINAL ACTION (like ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS MURDERING AMERICANS). You’ve likely read about the Kate Steinle case in San Francisco, where a college girl, out with her PARENTS! for dinner, was SHOT to death on the SIDEWALK by an illegal immigrant from Mexico WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN DEPORTED FIVE — 5! — TIMES — but since San Francisco cares MORE about illegals than CITIZENS, the city/county/state DID NOTHING. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Kathryn_Steinle

            Then, since I live in the Washington DC area, I am especially aware of the school kid (girl, age 14) who was RAPED in the school restroom by two kids, 1 was 18: he was from Guatemala, arrested at the border but released into the “custody” (that’s a joke!) of his father, and the other whose identity hasn’t been released, but he was 17 and here illegally. This happened in the “sanctuary county” of Montgomery County, Maryland, a posh suburb of Washington DC, where the local govt. REFUSES to work with the FEDERAL government (which they are REQUIRED BY LAW to do) on immigration cases. The ‘net is still spotty on this — it only happened 2 days ago — but I’ve picked up the story in bits from the news and I stand by this info.

            What a “great nation” should DO is GET RID of these illegals — or JAIL them — so they won’t kill or rape or otherwise attack OUR citizens. Now THAT would show us to be a “great nation.” YOUR ideas DO NOT.

          • Adding to the devaluation of the $US dollar is the $5 Trillion in quantitative easing (QE) that The Fed directed under Obama? Like it or not supply/demand market forces affect the buying power of the dollar. Few people discuss the negative impact of QE.

  9. Schumer still faces pay to play charges concerning those visa permits. Should be very easy to prove even for Sessions.

    • Sick Trey Gowdy on him.

    • You’re right about Schumer facing “pay to play” charges, but why so hard on Jeff Sessions? IF HE HAD BEEN IN OFFICE as Attorney General, he would have been able to sic a grand jury on Hillary AND launch DOJ investigations of numerous Obama & Clinton tricks.

      But he didn’t get confirmed until Feb. 9, entirely because of Sen. Chuck Schumer’s delaying tactics (which he’s using for PURELY political reasons against EVERY Trump appointee).

      Sessions couldn’t do ANYTHING before he was confirmed, and still can’t do much because most of his top-level deputies and the Soliciitor General have STILL not had their confirmation hearings/votes. An Attorney General, no matter HOW capable, CAN’T RUN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ALL BY HIMSELF, and Sessions can’t rely on ANY of the ALL-DEMOCRAT “careerists” left behind by the Obama people. WHEN HE HAS A STAFF, he can move on Schumer, Hillary, and many other pending cases.

      But DON’T BLAME SESSIONS — blame Chuck Schumer and his “we lost the election so we won’t play!” team. (He’s now promising to use the filibuster to block the confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, forcing the Republicans to put an end to filibusters entirely. It’s a BIG price to pay, but maybe when WE have 60 votes in the Senate we can bring it back. Anyway, give Sessions credit for doing ALL HE CAN, despite not having ANY staff to help him!

  10. For those of you reading this “Notice” PLEASE read the actual interview with Mr. Nunun and see what HE REALLY said. It is a Taped Video and not the heresay you are reading here. FACT CHECK PLEASE

    • Mr. “Nunun”???? Who’s he?

      • It’s Nunus, and you know damn well who he is……

        • Sorry, but I never saw OR heard the name before. EVER. And it was spelled NunuN, not NunuS IN YOUR POST (to which I was responding), so if there’s an IDIOT here, it’s YOU for misspelling a NAME in your own post.

          Google lists an “Nunu” but nothing without the apostrophe, so assuming you know what an apostrophe is FOR, you SHOULD HAVE USED IT. And if you’re one of those illiterate millennials who never learned how to use apostrophes, DON’T BLAME ME. Talk to your third grade teacher (assuming you made it through) or maybe your Mother.

          And don’t be so damned RUDE to someone you don’t even know — you have NO way to know who or what I DO know, so if I say “who’s he?” YOU CAN REASONABLY ASSUME I REALLY DON’T KNOW. The POLITE thing to do would be TELL ME, not assume for some absurd reason (WHY?) I would LIE about knowing who/what you mean. But then, I guess expecting even MINIMAL good manners from a member of YOUR generation is asking WAY too much.

  11. Democrats are going down and Obama is going to jail where he belongs.

  12. I just emailed Schumer a copy of the US Constitution and told him he needs to read it.

    How about we impeach him for having breakfast with Putin. I am sure he has more POLITICAL ties to Putin then Trump with all his years screwing the US Citizens

    Here is a link to contacting him. Give him hell https://www.schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck

    • LOVE it! He DOES need to read it (CAREFULLY this time). But it won’t really help much — libs like Schumer are impervious to reality and don’t CARE what the Constitution says (after all, it was written 230 years ago and need “modernizing” — or so Schumer’s friend Ruth Bader Ginsberg might say!)

  13. Hey there Chucky that has a past to hide with the Pedo file connection YOu were mentions on the Weiner laptop. Tell me did you have to pay blackmail to keep him quiet.!!!!! What else is going to be uncovered —like the tunnels under Wash.DC.????????? That leads to the chambers on these sex slaves.!!!????

  14. This also proves that James Comey perjured himself under oath. Nunes’s announcement came two days after FBI Director James Comey testified, with clarity, that Trump’s tweets accusing President Obama of having Trump Tower under surveillance were not true. This is grounds for immediate dismissal and charges filed against James Comey.

  15. Kimberly Grant Deleon

    Fuck Trump AND the whole Administration and Paul Ryan! #TrumpRussia is going to take him down. Keep believing his lies if you want to!!! #ImpeachTrumpandBannon

    • Hillary Clinton herself said that she loved Democrats because “they are mostly uneducated and easily manipulated”. To prove her right you voted for her after she said it.
      Obama said in a speech “the only people who fear the truth are those with something to hide.” You cheered. Then he proceeded to spend a lot of money and time trying to have all of his records sealed. He even spent $36,000,000 of taxpayer money trying to conceal his administrations records from the public. Yesterday it was announced that he embezzled profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to bolster up the health insurance companies that were on the skids due to Obamacare. Those profits were supposed to go to the investors who used their money to bolster up Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. I know you don’t care – it wasn’t your money.

      • Kimberly Grant Deleon

        Soon they will lead Trump out in cuffs. Russia got what they wanted. Americans lose. I dont give a damn what you think.

        • You don’t give a damn about anything don’t try to pretend you care about the truth.

        • NO, you idiot, Russia DID NOT get what it wanted — not from President Trump or Bannon, anyway. THEY GOT WHAT THEY WANTED WHEN HILLARY VISITED MOSCOW AS SECRETARY OF STATE AND HIT THE (MISSPELLED) “RESET” BUTTON to gales of laughter from her Russian audience, including Putin, who ALL thought she was a TOTAL IDIOT.
          Nobody will be leading President Trump out “in cuffs.” The CHIEF JUSTICE will be leading him to the Capitol on Jan. 20, 2021, to TAKE THE OATH OF OFFICE FOR HIS SECOND TERM.

          And btw, I don’t care whether you “give a damn” what I think or not. This is an OPEN board, and ANY and ALL of us have a right to express our opinions. YOU seem to be the only one who needs really FOUL language to do it.

    • MY, what a LADY!!!!
      Didn’t anyone ever tell you that if you need to use 4-letter words to express a simple thought, it means YOU DON’T HAVE A BRAIN?

  16. Whether or not Obama spied on Trump will be small potatoes compared to when they finally find out who Obama really is.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xck4t1jVnAQ&feature=youtube

  17. While we are at draining the swamp let’s put a stop to Pelosi’s/Schumer’s/ Schiff’s/Water’s slanderous comments! The only scumbags/ rookies I can see are the ones calling names! This childish rhetoric is a bad joke & the US is being laughed at globally! For God’s sake – GROW UP OR GO HOME!

    • The downside of the First Amendment’s free speech clause is that idiots like Pelosi/Schumer/Schiff & Waters can say what they damn well please — but then, so can WE And WE have the champion Tweeter on the PLANET on OUR side. Think: Maybe a few hundred, ok, a couple of thousand, people pay ANY attention to Pelosi or Schumer, many fewer to the others (Waters’s constituents can barely READ, never mind Tweet!), and President Trump has MILLIONS of Twitter followers. I like our odds. 🙂

      BUT if you “put a stop to” (as opposed to just not paying attention to) people like the named imbeciles, ONE of these days they, or more likely their successors, WILL HAVE MAJORITIES AGAIN and another President who might ALSO know how to use Twitter effectively. And then, IF we “put a stop to” THEIR side exercising ITS free speech, THEY WILL FEEL FREE TO DO THE SAME TO US.
      If you wonder what it’s like to live without free speech, check out Cuba. Or Venezuela. Or CHINA.

    • muthfighter.com is NOT a site for “serious discussion” of ANYTHING, except maybe LEFT-WING politics. It is FUNDED by GEORGE SOROS, you idiot, and HE is further to the Left than PUTIN.

  18. “Wire Tapped” is a generic term that refers to ALL the modern methods for monitoring the private conversations of other people; It NO LONGER refers to the old practice of hooking wires onto other peoples phone terminals to listen to conversations, NO MORE agents in the basement with a wire recorder and ear phones.

  19. Frankly, I do not believe this to be the biggest scandal. IMO, That was having a non-American, gay man married to a transgender. I do not have a big problem with LGBT’S. It’s the big fat lie.

  20. Truth is truth is truth! However, that doesn’t mean that fools accept the truth, nor that they respect the truth, nor that they obey the truth! One wonders just how much of the Constitution these liberals truly understand. So sad!

  21. Demonrats, they are all the same. They don’t care about the truth, they think it’s okay to ruin peoples reputations, they lie till their tongues fall out, and they are the most evil people there are. No wonder liberals are all out crazy.

  22. Roger in Republic

    Would it be possible to charge Obama with a crime or two, convict him, and revoke his presidential pension? Pensions for federal employees are paid for honorable performance and can be denied for misfeasance or malfeasance in office. Abuse of the national security laws sounds like impeachable offences to me.

    • Well, first we have to find a FELONY that he actually committed HIMSELF (not committed by a member of his staff, which gives HIM “plausible deniability” — that is, the possibility of claiming he knew nothing about it). THEN we have to empanel a grand jury to indict him — NOT an easy job in Washington DC, where NINETY-SEVEN PERCENT of the population VOTED FOR HILLARY (and over half are Black). THEN, if we GOT the indictment, we’d have to have a TRIAL (again, not so easy with a population heavily on his side). THEN, IF he was convicted, we MIGHT be able to revoke his pension.

      Unfortunately, it’s too late to bring impeachment against Obama — ONLY A SITTING OFFICIAL CAN BE IMPEACHED. We (Republicans and conservatives) got BADLY burned when we DID impeach, but couldn’t convict, Bill Clinton, and it taught us that we shouldn’t use THAT weapon unless we have an ABSOLUTE, OPEN-AND-SHUT case, which we never had (or the people investigating it never thought we had) on Obama. Sadly, NO justice system is perfect and BAD GUYS DO GO FREE (see: O.J. Simpson, Teddy Kennedy, Michael Skakel (the Kennedy cousin who killed a high school kid because she wouldn’t go out with him and WAS willing to date his BROTHER: Greenwich, Conn., 1975); and whichever family member — probably the stepbrother — who killed JonBenet Ramsay (Colorado Springs, 1996) and too many more to list. “Law and Order” and all the other TV series notwithstanding, sometimes the criminal justice system is a joke. 🙁

  23. Obama and all of his followers are traitors and should die.

  24. “Either Trump and Putin successfully “took over” the U.S. government or Democrats are playing an unthinkable hoax on the American people while trying to dismantle a legitimate administration.” All bets are on the latter!!!

  25. Barbra Zuanich-Friedman

    You sure don’t know the story of Nunes and his cavorting to the White House before going back to his Congressional Intel Committee…And, by the way, it was ‘incidental’ in nature…a long way from intended wiretapping….what a site!

    • Incidental my ass. Obama wanted wire taps obama got wire taps. Calling it incidental is their way to get away with listening in on trump and his team.

  26. They also should start by reading the whole of the Hypocratic Oath.

  27. Send Obama and the democrats responsible to prison. They like anyone else should pay for their crimes.

  28. Its pretty clear. Obummer is behind this whole scandal and he needs to be brought up on charges. He is a scumbag muslim and not even a citizen of this country. Sheriff Joe Arpaio saw to that. He needs to be arrested

  29. The Dem-ons will never learn. They are just killing themselves with the Majority of this Country.

  30. Politicians all suck, PERIOD, I have never been more disgusted with this swamp, but the cesspool in the Intel agencies is even worse than house and senate idiots. If the senate hearing didn’t convince you just how stupid they are, nothing will. Franken was the biggest idiot of all, as if it wasn’t obvious from start. Gowdy is the only one I would give two cents for in congress, all the others should be removed by term limits which is only way to dump these crooks, liars and fraudsters.

    • Gowdy puts on a great show..gotta remember after completely distroying clinton/ bengahzi involving deaths/ criminal cover-ups/embassy staff were knowingly allowed to be murdered..obama/clinton wanted them dead ..Gowdy let clinton go free

      • So true, but now there is President Trump, while the fraud had enough on Clinton Cartel to bring them down, he also know HiLIARy had even more on him, so not only was it the white house of lies, it was also the house of bribes, you watch how they all start rolling over on each other when the shit hits the fan. DemonRats are $hitting bricks. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/897a3d5c4890a1ca8f99150fe14308656086c30c33a308f359f4acc7f3982905.jpg

      • Gowdy didn’t have any power or legal authority to do anything BUT “let Clinton go free.” He’s NOT the Justice Department; he’s a MEMBER of CONGRESS who was running an “investigative” hearing. He DID refer his committee’s findings to Justice, but the Attorney General under Obama, Loretta Lynch, wasn’t even remotely interested in empaneling a grand jury to prosecute Hillary (or any of the MANY Obama cronies). A SENATOR can’t DO that.

    • I think you’re being a LITTLE harsh — there ARE good people among the pols, but the idiots & liars do get most of the attention.
      (I agree 100000% about Franken: the people of Minnesota should be ASHAMED of themselves for electing that MORON!)

      Don’t mix the “intel agencies” people with politicians, though. The intel gang INTENTIONALLY keep themselves APART from politics, except when they want to skewer a conservative who wants a robust intelligence community. It will be interesting to see if Mike Pompeo, the new CIA Director, who IS a politician, will make any difference in how badly the agency is run: my guess is one man can’t do much, but I could be wrong. Pompeo had a VERY strong record in the NSA and on the intel committee while he served in the House.

      I’m a big Trey Gowdy fan, too.

      All term limits will do is bring in a new collection of people we don’t KNOW we can trust, AND it will give MUCH more power to the PERMANENT CAREER “CIVIL SERVANTS” — WHO WEREN’T ELECTED BY ANYONE — and who ALREADY run most of the departments and agencies in the Executive Branch. THEY will have even MORE power when the Congressional people don’t have enough experience to know how to take them on. THAT really worries me.

      Also, remember, term limits would GET RID OF TREY GOWDY, TOO! Not just the idiots or crooks. Gowdy’s replacement MIGHT even BE an idiot or a crook, who knows?

  31. We all knew Donald “Trump University” Trump was a crook. But you all voted for him anyway, because . . . well, because Hillary. Very soon, you will learn how bad a crook Trump is. What will you say, then?

  32. I just read on The Blaze website that “Liberal senator gets brutal responses when she explains why she’s voting ‘no’ on Gorsuch nomination” – Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said he was too much of a legalist??!!!?? She said, “Judge Gorsuch has consistently valued legalisms over real lives. I won’t support his nomination,…”. Is she for real? Before she was elected to the senate, she was Attorney General of California, where her job was to uphold and defend the law. Twitter is having a field day. I had actually heard this on Fox News earlier this morning but didn’t catch the whole thing. I didn’t know who the source was or who the senator was, so I Googled it and finally found it. Everyone needs a good laugh for the day! Bob’s wife.

  33. I don’t recall having ever seen Chuck Schumer speak on camera without reading from a prepared statement. I don’t think he has ever harbored a useful thought that didn’t die of loneliness. You can always depend on Chuckie to grab the limelight after the horses have left the barn reading from a prepared statement describing how he is going to propose legislation to shut those barn doors once and for all.

  34. legitimate? what kind of BS are U spreading?

  35. Ehh….der tRumpenstein is the scandal, fool

  36. The BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL of all TIME, 8 yrs of obama.

  37. For once in Washington DC, we need to prosecute anyone who is guilty from the very top down. Does anyone have the balls to do this?

  38. This Congress’s Democrats are the most corrupt and brazen in our history. I hope they all reap what they have sown!

  39. This is only the biggest scandal in history until the next shoe drops on Obama. His whole life is one continuos scandal or scam. When all the dirt is finally revealed on the Clintons people will understand just evil how they are too.

  40. I go with the democrats playing a hoax.

  41. It was legal if: 1. You do not unmasked the names in the incidental collection; 2. You did not use foriegn agents as a pretext for spying on American citizens. 1 definitely happened and it is possible that 2 happened, so what was legal became illegal.

  42. We all know that we can no longer coexist with the liberal dem bloodsuckers.
    We all know that there is only one way to resolve the problem with the liberal dem bloodsuckers.
    Why are we waiting?

  43. libearls do not care about the law unless it benefits their agenda

  44. THE BUCK STOPS WHERE. RIGHT AT TRUMPS FEET AND JUST LIKE ARNOLD SWARTZ-EN-NAGER IN CALIFORNIA WHO BRAGGED HE WAS GOING TO SHOW THE GIRLY BOYS IN SACRAMENTO HOW TO DO BUSINESS, INSTEAD GOT BENT OVER FOR 6 YEARS AND SPANKED AND TOOK IT UP THE REAR AND HELP’ED DESTROY THE MOST PROFITABLE STATE IN THE COUNTRY . I SENT HIM A JAR OF VASELINE I BETTER GET ONE READY FOR TRUMP BECAUSE HE DOESN’T HAVE THE BALLS TO FIGHT JUST BLAME !!!!! VIETNAM VET

  45. Oh, come on. “Biggest scandal in political history”? Get a grip on your hyperbole. And no, I’m not a Democrat.

  46. So Comey said, clearly unequivocally boldly proclaiming PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP and Trump Tower was not under surveillance. Information clearly shows that statement to be untrue. Is Jim Comey incompetent or is Jim Comey a liar? The investigation of HILLARY CLINTON by Jim Comey is also suspect of either him lying or simply he is incompetent. Either way JIM COMEY is incompetent incapable inept and unfit to run an organization as the FBI.

    • jim comey is an incapable, incompetet, inep liar that is unfit for anything except to serve as a poster child for birth control.

  47. Somehow I don’t recall any conservative comments about the patently unconstitutional matter of the GOP-controlled Senate refusing to give Obama’s SCOTUS nominee even the benefit of a Senate committee hearing. The Constitutional issues seem on this forum to have come into play only when they can be advanced in favor of a candidate preferred by the right. A bit of an imbalance, wouldn’t you say?

    • Because it’s NOT patently unconstitutional for the Senate to delay a hearing that ends up being a refusal when a new President is elected.

      “Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint … judges of the Supreme Court.”

      It could not be simpler. The president nominates someone. If the Senate gives its advice and consent, then the president can appoint him. But nowhere does the Constitution say that the Senate is required to act on the president’s nominations. The Framers certainly didn’t understand the Senate to bear such an obligation. And the Framers who drafted that document certainly didn’t say that the Senate bore such an obligation.”

      BTW: Joe Biden in 1992: No nominations to the Supreme Court in an election year.

      • Article II, Section 2. of the Constitution mandates upon the President a duty, as defined in the text:.

        “…he SHALL [emphasis added] nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, SHALL [emphasis added] appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law…”

        Refusal of the Senate even to consider the President’s nominee constitutes interference of that body with the President’s Constitutionally-mandated duty and responsibility relative to an appointment that is included in this section. In thus hindering the President from carrying out his Constitutionally-assigned duty, the Senate is itself acting unconstitutionally.

  48. Obama, what a huge pile of dog dudy. My mother always told me, you don’t hate anyone, but she didn’t live long enough to know about Obama. I’m sure she would have made an exception.

  49. I have had a Trump for President sign on my car since 2012. I have backed him all the way and gotten into many arguments with friends on his behalf.

    NOW, I fear he is doing exactly what the establishment aka RINOs has done to us in the last 3 or more election cycles.

    …Stabbing us in the back after promising and promising to STOP illegals REPEAL NobamaCare…yada, yada.

    So far, Trump has added to the betrayal: STOPPING Muslims and failure to REPLACE Scalia with another similar SCOTUS justice.

    How could Trump be sucked into Ryan’s RHINO NoBamaCare in different clothing?

    Doesn’t he know he got elected coz we hate EVERYTHING the Republican Wing of the Democratic Party stands for and does?

    Trump’s now blaming us conservatives for non-passage of NoBamaCare 2.0. WTF? We voted him in to REPEAL NoBamaCare!

    And that liberal SCOTUS nominee, Gorsuch…OMG! Have you seen his rulings? Pro-illegals, pro-abortion, NOT a strict constructionist, but another liberal legislating from the bench…most likely, Will NOT back up Trump’s Constitutional travel ban to protect Americans.

    Donald, WHAT HAPPENED to all your promises?

  50. We all know that the Dem’s are trying their “damnest” to ruin our country and President Trump. However, what they don’t get is, we the “deplorables” are still behind Trump and always will be regardless of all the “fake” news they put out. We know they are nothing but liars and corrupt human beings, so to speak.

  51. True it won’t be pretty and every thing should be done to discover the truth and prosecute the guilty!

  52. Present the evidence to a Federal Grand Jury and let the chips fall where they may.
    This may assist in draining the cesspool.

  53. Until the GOP finds some kind of courage the Dem’s will continue to do whatever they want. They have the MSM behind them and they also have the RINO’s and CINO’s. After 8 years I guess they became “fond” of being “dumped-on” and now they run to the Congressional Bar and buy the drinks for the Dem’s just to show them how much they loved being “Push-overs”!

  54. Quit f-ing around and go nucular on their asses get him appointed now !

  55. No! The primary scandal is Pedogate. I don’t care how much the media, mainstream or independent or otherwise attempts to spin it. No! We The People are not going to let go of this subject. Pedogate will not be conveniently shoved under the rug.

  56. “….one of the greatest political scandals in U.S. history.” “Scandal?” ‘SCANDAL??!!’ Nothing to see here, folks. Just the same ole same ole interior decay of America that has been on-going for decades. Politics to benefit the politicians, insure their reelections, line “their” bottom lines and “the devil take the hindmost” (We The Foolish People)!

  57. This story is so full of “if” and “maybe” and “what if” that is hardly bears telling at all. We should have names. Who said what? What was actually going on. We don’t need half truths or shoving it all under the rug. We’ve had more than enough of that.

  58. Schumer is still trying to run everything,he has no business demanding anything. Does he now think he is O with power behind him? He and his group are in the minority now and shouldn’t be demanding. For once do something for this country,not yourself!!

  59. Marjorie Lee Peterson

    Nobody with half a brain will believe any Democrat story! They made the whole thing up and then planted malware on the server at Trump Tower so that people would think it was in contact with Russia! They should all be arrested and charged with trying to overthrow the government!

    • And you represent those who believe that your hated LIBs do not know what we are talking about?
      Do you really believe “malware” is a culpret. ? Are you incapable of appreciating emerging evidence of the Trump ties to Russia? Do you know anyhthing about Trump’s business shenanigans and long history with international money laundering? Of course you don’t….you only listen to “news” stations who feed you what your want to hear; and reject information that differs from your baked-in beliefs. In case you have yet to hear…..medling in another country’s elections is an “Act of War” (Dick Chaney) Involvement with such medelling is “Treason”.
      But you all are not interested in those facts…..you are oly interested in news that give you “gotchas” about” immigrant rapists”

  60. Jocelyndmcclellan

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj429d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !mj429d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash429HomeDirectGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj429d:….,…..

  61. NUNEZ is being hammered for DOING HIS JOB while the dems attack and use their “Russia narrative” to promote their impeachment designs…..screw disgustocrats and rinos….get rid of all of them….

  62. The Dem’s are trying to dismantle a legit. administration. Crooked Hillary, Obama, Soros and others.

  63. it will be nothing more than a ” CHUCKIE BOY DOG an PONY SHOW ” schumer could really careless, about the AMERICAN CITIZEN. he is all in this BIG MOUTHING an ADULT TEMPER TANTRUM , for him an only for him.

  64. This is huge- and hopefully takes down Obama that POS.
    This is much bigger than watergate and we better see multiple indictments soon.
    Faggot Chuck, and Lesbo Pulosi try to shift attention to Russian influence of our election– a dead horse with nothing but hot air.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/86de8d70d0e435e1260b01e67a75f355c10842c2246fc4aa70ef2996d713c85b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2bc063955648512060f4c8cf7e051ca1451fb8db451c22bb404f31bd68aa954c.jpg

  65. If all say it is not true, and then it comes to it is true. Must be a lot of crap coming out of this Government and most of it , and not only that but eveything else all points to the Democrats why would that be?

  66. We all know how the democrats “NEVER” tell the truth unless it benefits them, which would be seldom, if ever. I no longer, for many years now give them the benefit of any doubt because they are most likely lying if it benefits them. That goes for the MSM also. they are both constantly lying to benefit their agenda.

  67. I think old Chucky-wuckie would drop dead if he were forced to read, let alone enforce, the US Constitution. This old Leftie should be put out to pasture. (If the cattle are still willing to graze alongside him).

  68. It will end in revolution. Seditious acts and/or treason cannot and must not be tolerated, no matter the parties involved. Lock and load, my Patriots.

  69. I think Hillary Clinton is the biggest scandal in American history!

  70. When are people going to start to realize when President Donald J. Trump says something there is more truth to what he says then fiction . The man did not become a billionaire , enter a presidential race , beat every single candidate on the Republican side, then beat hillary rotten clinton getting 306 electoral votes to win the 2016 presidential election wile the lame stream media, half the republican party and all of the democratic party against him for him to not know what he is talking about ! US citizens have been jaded by the fact for the last eight years we’ve had a fraud and usurper sitting in the White House, every time he opened his mouth a lie came out !

  71. The media always has a negative attitude against Trump. Instead of you know Trump could be right all along. They print nothing has shown up against him and Russia YET To me fishing is what is going on. There is no smoke, only the Democrats charange, because they lost the election. They have a bonified smoking gun against the Clintons. Not doing a thing about reporting that. I no longer watch anything but Hannity, and ORiely, Trumps Tweets, what is happing live to see,it before they change it to a false story. Seems most people I talk with do the same thing. Especially the Tweets and Live.

  72. Newsflash , the whole ” Russian ” story was invented and promoted for one reason , to try and discredit the Trump administration for the upcoming crack down on the pedophiles and child trafficking .

  73. Crimocrats… not democrats….if their mouths move it is a lie

  74. WE NEED A NEW DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION—PERIOD, END OF DISCUSSION.

  75. Vincent Marcantelli

    That information that is coming out, on how the Demo’s got all that information is just another indication as to just how the Democrats view the American public. Obama, again, sat a looked Trump in the face as told one lie after another, then had the guts to shake hands……all for public consumption of course. This is the tactics used in Russia, in IRAQ, and other countries where the Govt. does not trust it’s people, yea, so think about that, [Why would a country not trust it’s leadership, so the leadership is evil as hell, and the Govt. is fearful of it’s people, finding out and starting a UP ENDING of that ROTTEN Govt.] What that told me, Obama, was dirty and was scared of the country finding out just how evil he was/is. His, “leadership” has effected his party, the Democrats, but really, it didn’t take that much……the Demo’s the LEFT have been dirty for over 150 yrs, they have a proven HISTORY of dirty dealings. From before Abe Lincoln, the Democrat party has been a problem for this country – prove otherwise!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*