Danielle Alvarez Accuses Media of Favoritism during the 2020 Election

As the dust remains unsettled from the 2020 U.S. election, Danielle Alvarez is not mincing words about what she believes was media bias that swayed voter decisions.

At a Glance

Danielle Alvarez criticizes the media for shielding Biden-Harris from essential scrutiny.
Alvarez believes this caused an unbalanced representation, misleading voters about key issues.
The conversation extends to media integrity, journalistic responsibility, and how biases affect democratic elections.
Recent debates have highlighted ongoing concerns about President Biden’s performance and perceived media bias.

Bias in Media Coverage: Shielding Biden-Harris

The 2020 U.S. election was a momentous event in American history, yet Danielle Alvarez believes it was marred by significant media bias. Alvarez asserts that mainstream media outlets failed in their duty of objectivity, effectively shielding President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris from necessary scrutiny, thereby misinforming the public.

A recent debate where Biden struggled to maintain his composure underscores these concerns. According to a detailed report by The New York Times, Biden appeared meandering and often stumbled through his answers, causing significant anxiety within the Democratic camp.

Debate Performances: A Stark Contrast

The debate further highlighted substantial disagreements on key issues such as abortion, inflation, climate change, foreign affairs, and immigration. The contrast in presentation styles was sharp, with Trump presenting as confident and forceful, while Biden’s performance was marked by a hoarse, halting voice and moments where he lost his train of thought, especially on critical matters like the national debt.

“Yes, there was a slow start,” she said, “but it was a strong finish.”

Alvarez points to these instances as evidence of media bias, arguing that such moments were either downplayed or inadequately reported. She claims that this selective reporting deprived the electorate of a balanced view, skewing public perception of Biden’s competence and capability.

.@LinseyDavis speaks with Trump campaign Senior Advisor Danielle Alvarez as former Pres. Trump prepares for his big address to close out the RNC on Thursday night. https://t.co/U4fxY7bPEH pic.twitter.com/6YxVfnGvvm

— ABC News Live (@ABCNewsLive) July 18, 2024

The Aftermath: Calls for Media Reform

The debate also exposed Biden’s vulnerabilities, particularly the growing concerns about his age and ability to articulate specifics. Despite this, Alvarez argues that biased reporting has continued to protect him, affecting the narrative surrounding his candidacy. As the post-debate analysis revealed, Trump managed to make several misleading attacks largely unimpeded, benefitting from muted mics and a favorable order of topics.

“We’d be able to wipe out his debt. We’d be able to help make sure that all those things we need to do child care, elder care, making sure that we continue to strengthen our health care system, making sure that we’re able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I’ve been able to do with the — with, with the Covid, excuse me. With dealing with everything we have to do with — look, if — we finally beat Medicare.” – President Joe Biden, 2024 debate.

Biden’s recent address to the nation, calling for a reduction in political violence following an assassination attempt on Trump, and the FBI’s ongoing investigation into the incident, only add layers to this complex issue of media representation and biases. According to the reports, the incident has caused widespread shock and uncertainty in the 2024 presidential race, further complicating an already contentious political landscape.

In conclusion, Danielle Alvarez’s critique brings to the fore crucial questions about media integrity and journalistic responsibility. As conservative readers, it’s imperative to acknowledge the role of the media in shaping democratic elections and demand accountability to ensure that future elections are fair and unbiased, giving voters a complete picture to make informed decisions.