AG Bondi Issues Warning Over Dem Rep’s Comments

Sign reading "Office of the Attorney General."

Pam Bondi warns Representative Jasmine Crockett that her call to have Elon Musk “taken down” could incite further violence amid ongoing attacks on Tesla properties.

Quick Takes

US Attorney General Pam Bondi warned Rep. Jasmine Crockett to “tread very carefully” after comments about wanting Elon Musk “taken down.”
Three individuals have been federally charged for attacks on Tesla properties and face up to 20 years in prison.
Crockett claims she was referring to a planned non-violent “Tesla Takedown” protest on March 29, not calling for violence.
The justice department is treating recent attacks on Tesla dealerships and charging stations as “domestic terrorism.”
Bondi emphasized that elected officials must be cautious with their rhetoric to avoid potentially inciting violence.

Bondi Confronts Crockett’s Inflammatory Remarks

US Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a stern warning to Representative Jasmine Crockett during a recent interview on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo. The warning came in response to Crockett’s controversial comments expressing a desire to see Tesla CEO Elon Musk “taken down” on her birthday. Bondi’s caution comes amid a series of attacks on Tesla dealerships and charging stations by far-Left extremists, which have been classified by authorities as domestic terrorism. The timing of Crockett’s remarks has raised concerns about the potential for such statements to inspire further violence.

Tesla Under Attack as Domestic Terrorism Threat Intensifies

Bondi highlighted the seriousness of the situation by revealing that three individuals have already been charged federally in connection with attacks on Tesla properties. These individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for their actions, which involved throwing Molotov cocktails at Tesla dealerships and charging stations, posing significant danger to people and property. The Justice Department has taken a firm stance on these incidents, categorizing them as domestic terrorism. These attacks appear to be part of a coordinated effort against Musk and his companies, a situation that makes public officials’ rhetoric about Tesla and its CEO particularly sensitive.

The Attorney General emphasized that authorities are not backing down from these charges and are investigating whether there is a broader conspiracy at play. Bondi emphatically stated that nothing will happen to Elon Musk and pledged to protect Tesla owners across the country. This firm stance reflects the administration’s commitment to preventing politically motivated violence and property destruction, regardless of which side of the political spectrum may be responsible. Law enforcement’s swift response demonstrates the seriousness with which these threats are being taken.

Crockett Defends “Tesla Takedown” as Non-Violent Protest

In response to Bondi’s warning, Representative Crockett has defended her comments, claiming they were taken out of context. She clarified that she was referring to a planned “Tesla Takedown” protest scheduled for March 29, which coincides with her birthday. According to Crockett, this movement advocates for selling Tesla vehicles and stock as a form of economic protest against Musk, not violence. The Tesla Takedown website explicitly states its opposition to violence and vandalism, emphasizing that all protests should adhere to local laws. Despite these clarifications, Republicans continue to accuse Crockett of using inflammatory rhetoric.

Crockett further expanded on her position by stating that she was referring to financial pressure as the “language” that business leaders understand, not physical harm. She pointed out that peaceful protests are protected under the First Amendment and accused the Trump administration of hypocrisy for pardoning January 6 rioters while taking a hard line against Tesla protestors. The congresswoman insists her calls to action are about “fighting” for democracy through non-violent means, creating a stark contrast between her interpretation of her words and how they’ve been received by political opponents.

Officials Face Heightened Responsibility in Politically Charged Climate

The exchange between Bondi and Crockett highlights the heightened responsibility public officials face regarding their rhetoric in today’s polarized political climate. As attacks on Tesla properties continue and the March 29 “Global Day of Action” approaches, law enforcement remains vigilant. Bondi’s warning serves as a reminder that words from elected representatives carry significant weight and can be interpreted in ways that might inspire unlawful actions. Whether Crockett’s remarks were misinterpreted or deliberately provocative, the incident underscores the fine line public officials must walk when criticizing political opponents and their business interests.